Literature DB >> 28545999

A comparative analysis of the efficacy of three cryopreservation protocols on the survival of in vitro-derived cattle embryos at pronuclear and blastocyst stages.

Van Huong Do1, Simon Walton2, Sally Catt3, Andrew W Taylor-Robinson4.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of three cryopreservation protocols (slow freezing, short equilibration vitrification and long equilibration vitrification) on in vitro-derived cattle embryos at expanded blastocyst and pronuclear stages was compared. 199 expanded blastocysts of good quality were assigned randomly into four treatment groups [control, non-cryopreserved (fresh, unfrozen); and the three cryopreservation methods]. The re-expansion of the cryopreserved blastocysts after 24 h in vitro culture was similar to that of the fresh control group. However, the hatching rate of expanded blastocysts after 48 h culture was significantly less for the slow freezing group (31/47; 66.0%) than for both the short equilibration vitrification (46/51; 90.2%) and long equilibration vitrification groups (42/50; 84.0%). Denuded presumptive zygotes at the pronuclear stage (14-18 h post-insemination) were assigned randomly to the same four treatment groups and, following thawing, embryos were assessed for their capacity to cleave and to develop into a blastocyst. Overall, cleavage rates of cryopreserved zygotes were significantly less than those of the fresh control. The blastocyst formation rate of slow-frozen zygotes (4/81; 4.9%) was significantly less than that of zygotes subjected either to short equilibration vitrification (18/82; 22.0%) or long equilibration vitrification (16/74; 21.6%). All cryopreservation groups showed rates of blastocyst formation that were significantly less than that of the fresh control (51/92; 55.4%). Collectively, our findings indicate that vitrification is the preferred technology to cryopreserve in vitro-derived cattle embryos at expanded blastocyst and pronuclear stages. Moreover, short equilibration vitrification technology can improve outcomes and be more efficient by taking less time to perform.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cattle; Cryopreservation; In vitro-derived embryo; Pronuclear; Slow freezing; Vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28545999     DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  3 in total

1.  A new, simple, automatic vitrification device: preliminary results with murine and bovine oocytes and embryos.

Authors:  Amir Arav; Yehudit Natan; Dorit Kalo; Alisa Komsky-Elbaz; Zvika Roth; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Milton Leong; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A Shorter Equilibration Period Improves Post-Warming Outcomes after Vitrification and in Straw Dilution of In Vitro-Produced Bovine Embryos.

Authors:  Iris Martínez-Rodero; Tania García-Martínez; Erika Alina Ordóñez-León; Meritxell Vendrell-Flotats; Carlos Olegario Hidalgo; Joseba Esmoris; Xabier Mendibil; Sabino Azcarate; Manel López-Béjar; Marc Yeste; Teresa Mogas
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10

3.  Exopolysaccharide ID1 Improves Post-Warming Outcomes after Vitrification of In Vitro-Produced Bovine Embryos.

Authors:  Erika Alina Ordóñez-León; Iris Martínez-Rodero; Tania García-Martínez; Manel López-Béjar; Marc Yeste; Elena Mercade; Teresa Mogas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 6.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.