Literature DB >> 28545796

Is Type D personality a risk factor for all-cause mortality? A prospective population-based study among 2625 colorectal cancer survivors from the PROFILES registry.

Dounya Schoormans1, Olga Husson2, Johan Denollet3, Floortje Mols4.   

Abstract

Objective Our goal was to examine whether Type D personality and its components, negative affectivity (NA) and social inhibition (SI), were associated with all-cause mortality among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
METHODS: CRC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2009, as registered in the Dutch population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry, received a questionnaire on Type D (DS14) on average 5.3years after diagnosis. Survival status (31-12-2013) was obtained from the Central Bureau for Genealogy. We used a Cox proportional hazard model to relate personality to all-cause mortality, while adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics and cardiovascular disease (CVD).
RESULTS: Fifty percent was categorized as the 'reference group' (n=1281), 17% as 'SI only' (n=421), 12% as 'NA only' (n=309), and 21% as 'Type D' (n=532). After adjustment, CRC patients in the 'NA only' and 'Type D' groups showed an increased risk (HR=2.0, 95% CI=1.4-2.8, p<0.01, and HR=1.7, 95% CI=1.3-2.4, p<0.01) for all-cause mortality. This adverse effect of NA was limited to men aged >70. There was an additional adverse effect of SI on all-cause mortality in older men without CVD (HR=2.3, 95% CI=1.2-4.4, p=0.01). Personality was not related to mortality in women. Entering personality continuously, showed an increased risk for NA among older survivors, men and patients with comorbid CVD. Neither SI nor the interaction term was predictive in both the un- and adjusted Cox models.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that it is the NA component that drives the adverse effect of psychological distress on survival in CRC patients, which is most prominent among older men.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Mortality; Negative affectivity; Social inhibition; Type D personality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28545796     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Psychopathology Features, Personality, and Coping in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.

Authors:  Lisa Minier; Baptiste Lignier; Cyrille Bouvet; Benjamin Gallais; Nathalie Camart
Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2018

2.  Retrospective Analyses of Psychological Distress and Defense Style Among Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ciro Conversano; Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe; Mario Miccoli; Rebecca Ciacchini; Annarita Di Silvestre; Rosa Lo Sterzo; Angelo Gemignani; Graziella Orrù
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2020-08

3.  Association between Type-D Personality and Affective (Anxiety, Depression, Post-traumatic Stress) Symptoms and Maladaptive Coping in Breast Cancer Patients: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Luigi Grassi; Rosangela Caruso; Martino Belvederi Murri; Richard Fielding; Wendy Lam; Silvana Sabato; Silvia De Padova; Maria Giulia Nanni; Tatiana Bertelli; Laura Palagini; Luigi Zerbinati
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Type D personality, stress, coping and performance on a novel sport task.

Authors:  Erika Borkoles; Mariana Kaiseler; Andrew Evans; Chantal F Ski; David R Thompson; Remco C J Polman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Type D Personality and Big Five Personality Traits and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Irena Wojciechowska; Rafał Matkowski; Tomasz Pawłowski
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.