Literature DB >> 28545685

Diagnostic value of combined diffusion-weighted imaging with dynamic contrast enhancement MRI in differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions.

J Cao1, L Xiao2, B He3, G Zhang3, J Dong2, Y Wu2, H Xie2, G Wang2, X Lin4.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the diagnostic value of combined diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: DWI and DCE-MRI were performed in 36 patients (14 were benign and 22 were malignant). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and signal enhanced extent (SEE), slope value, and time-signal intensity curve (TIC) type were recorded by two observers. Between-group comparison was made using the independent sample t-test and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the mean ADC value of the benign ([1.75±0.50]×10-3 mm2/s) and malignant ([1.11±0.47]×10-3 mm2/s) groups (p=0.001). The threshold ADC value of ≤1.10×10-3 mm2/s resulted in a sensitivity of 77.3%, a specificity of 92.9%, and an accuracy of 85.1%. A type III curve was found in 23 cases (21 malignant and two benign), a type II curve was seen in six cases (one malignant and five benign), and a type I curve in seven cases (all were benign). The SEE and slope values in the benign and malignant groups were 227.96±172.08, 325.60±125.86 (p=0.058); 0.97±0.67%/s, 3.19±3.20%/s (p=0.016), respectively. ROC analysis showed a sensitivity of 95.5%, a specificity of 85.7%, and an accuracy of 90.6% for malignancy, based on a slope cut-off value of >1.46%/s. Combining ADC and slope values resulted in a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 85.7%, and an accuracy of 92.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Both DWI and DCE-MRI showed promising results for differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions. A combination of DWI and DCE-MRI was the most valuable of the three.
Copyright © 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28545685     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

1.  Multiparametric MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting response to chemotherapy in cases of osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mohamed Saleh; Tamer Moustafa Abdelrahman; Youusef Madney; Ghada Mohamed; Ahmed Mohammed Shokry; Amr Farouk Moustafa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging for discriminating soft tissue sarcoma from vascular anomalies.

Authors:  Gang Wu; Xuanlin Liu; Yan Xiong; Jun Ran; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  A CT-based radiomics nomogram for distinguishing between benign and malignant bone tumours.

Authors:  Weikai Sun; Shunli Liu; Jia Guo; Song Liu; Dapeng Hao; Feng Hou; Hexiang Wang; Wenjian Xu
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Correlation of quantitative diffusion weighted MR imaging between benign, malignant chondrogenic and malignant non-chondrogenic bone tumors with histopathologic type.

Authors:  Rosy Setiawati; M S Suarnata; Paulus Rahardjo; Del Grande Filippo; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-03-08

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC): A potential in vivo biological surrogate of the incidentally discovered bone lesions at 3T MRI.

Authors:  M R Nouh; Ahmed Doweidar; Abdullah Mohie-Eddin Khalil
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2021-11-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.