Ziv Harel1, Glenn M Chertow2, Prakesh S Shah3, Shai Harel4, Paul Dorian5, Andrew T Yan5, Gustavo Saposnik6, Manish M Sood7, Amber O Molnar8, Jeffrey Perl9, Rachel M Wald10, Sam Silver4, Ron Wald9. 1. Division of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: harelz@smh.ca. 2. Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Division of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Division of Neurology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. Division of Nephrology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 8. Division of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 9. Division of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 10. Division of Cardiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis are at a high risk of ischemic stroke. The role of warfarin in mitigating this risk in patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis is uncertain. Our objective was to examine the safety and efficacy of warfarin in patients who have atrial fibrillation and receive dialysis. METHODS: We used MedLine, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished observational and interventional studies related to the use of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis, and provided data on the risk of stroke and/or bleeding outcomes relative to placebo or no anticoagulation therapy. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for these outcomes. RESULTS: No randomized controlled trials met the criteria for inclusion. Fourteen observational studies (20,398 participants) were included in the analysis. The use of warfarin was not associated with ischemic stroke (14 studies; 20,398 participants; aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.07), intracranial hemorrhage (hemorrhagic stroke; 4 studies; 15,726 participants; aHR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.93-4.00), gastrointestinal bleeding (3 studies; 14,693 participants; aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.8-1.76), or all-cause mortality (7 studies; 16,172 participants; aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Observational studies suggest that warfarin was not associated with a clear benefit or harm among patients who have atrial fibrillation and receive dialysis. These estimates were limited by study heterogeneity including the inability to account for a number of important confounders such as the time in the therapeutic range. Because of the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and bleeding complications in this population, well designed clinical trials of warfarin and other anticoagulants are urgently needed.
BACKGROUND:Patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis are at a high risk of ischemic stroke. The role of warfarin in mitigating this risk in patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis is uncertain. Our objective was to examine the safety and efficacy of warfarin in patients who have atrial fibrillation and receive dialysis. METHODS: We used MedLine, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished observational and interventional studies related to the use of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation who receive dialysis, and provided data on the risk of stroke and/or bleeding outcomes relative to placebo or no anticoagulation therapy. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for these outcomes. RESULTS: No randomized controlled trials met the criteria for inclusion. Fourteen observational studies (20,398 participants) were included in the analysis. The use of warfarin was not associated with ischemic stroke (14 studies; 20,398 participants; aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.07), intracranial hemorrhage (hemorrhagic stroke; 4 studies; 15,726 participants; aHR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.93-4.00), gastrointestinal bleeding (3 studies; 14,693 participants; aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.8-1.76), or all-cause mortality (7 studies; 16,172 participants; aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Observational studies suggest that warfarin was not associated with a clear benefit or harm among patients who have atrial fibrillation and receive dialysis. These estimates were limited by study heterogeneity including the inability to account for a number of important confounders such as the time in the therapeutic range. Because of the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and bleeding complications in this population, well designed clinical trials of warfarin and other anticoagulants are urgently needed.
Authors: Ran Abuhasira; Yuval Mizrakli; Avi Shimony; Victor Novack; Alla Shnaider; Yosef S Haviv Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mark Findlay; Rachael MacIsaac; Mary Joan MacLeod; Wendy Metcalfe; Manish M Sood; Jamie P Traynor; Jesse Dawson; Patrick B Mark Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2019-09-27