OBJECTIVES: To examine the validity of subthreshold pediatric bipolar I disorder (BP-I), we compared the familial risk for BP-I in the child probands who had either full BP-I, subthreshold BP-I, ADHD, or were controls that neither had ADHD nor bipolar disorder. METHODS: BP-I probands were youth aged 6-17 years meeting criteria for BP-I, full (N=239) or subthreshold (N=43), and also included were their first-degree relatives (N=687 and N=120, respectively). Comparators were youth with ADHD (N=162), controls without ADHD or bipolar disorder (N=136), and their first-degree relatives (N=511 and N=411, respectively). We randomly selected 162 non-bipolar ADHD probands and 136 non-bipolar, non-ADHD control probands of similar age and sex distribution to the BP-I probands from our case-control ADHD family studies. Psychiatric assessments were made by trained psychometricians using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children Epidemiological Version (KSADS-E) and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) structured diagnostic interviews. We analyzed rates of bipolar disorder using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Rates of full BP-I significantly differed between the four groups (χ23 =32.72, P<.001): relatives of full BP-I probands and relatives of subthreshold BP-I probands had significantly higher rates of full BP-I than relatives of ADHD probands and relatives of control probands. Relatives of full BP-I, subthreshold BP-I, and ADHD probands also had significantly higher rates of major depressive disorder compared to relatives of control probands. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that youth with subthreshold BP-I had similarly elevated risk for BP-I and major depressive disorder in first-degree relatives as youth with full BP-I. These findings support the diagnostic continuity between subsyndromal and fully syndromatic states of pediatric BP-I disorder.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the validity of subthreshold pediatric bipolar I disorder (BP-I), we compared the familial risk for BP-I in the child probands who had either full BP-I, subthreshold BP-I, ADHD, or were controls that neither had ADHD nor bipolar disorder. METHODS:BP-I probands were youth aged 6-17 years meeting criteria for BP-I, full (N=239) or subthreshold (N=43), and also included were their first-degree relatives (N=687 and N=120, respectively). Comparators were youth with ADHD (N=162), controls without ADHD or bipolar disorder (N=136), and their first-degree relatives (N=511 and N=411, respectively). We randomly selected 162 non-bipolar ADHD probands and 136 non-bipolar, non-ADHD control probands of similar age and sex distribution to the BP-I probands from our case-control ADHD family studies. Psychiatric assessments were made by trained psychometricians using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children Epidemiological Version (KSADS-E) and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) structured diagnostic interviews. We analyzed rates of bipolar disorder using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Rates of full BP-I significantly differed between the four groups (χ23 =32.72, P<.001): relatives of full BP-I probands and relatives of subthreshold BP-I probands had significantly higher rates of full BP-I than relatives of ADHD probands and relatives of control probands. Relatives of full BP-I, subthreshold BP-I, and ADHD probands also had significantly higher rates of major depressive disorder compared to relatives of control probands. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that youth with subthreshold BP-I had similarly elevated risk for BP-I and major depressive disorder in first-degree relatives as youth with full BP-I. These findings support the diagnostic continuity between subsyndromal and fully syndromatic states of pediatric BP-I disorder.
Authors: J Biederman; S V Faraone; E Mick; S Williamson; T E Wilens; T J Spencer; W Weber; J Jetton; I Kraus; J Pert; B Zallen Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: David A Axelson; Boris Birmaher; Michael A Strober; Benjamin I Goldstein; Wonho Ha; Mary Kay Gill; Tina R Goldstein; Shirley Yen; Heather Hower; Jeffrey I Hunt; Fangzi Liao; Satish Iyengar; Daniel Dickstein; Eunice Kim; Neal D Ryan; Erica Frankel; Martin B Keller Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: David Axelson; Benjamin Goldstein; Tina Goldstein; Kelly Monk; Haifeng Yu; Mary Beth Hickey; Dara Sakolsky; Rasim Diler; Danella Hafeman; John Merranko; Satish Iyengar; David Brent; David Kupfer; Boris Birmaher Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Benjamin Goldstein; Michael Strober; Mary Kay Gill; Jeffrey Hunt; Patricia Houck; Wonho Ha; Satish Iyengar; Eunice Kim; Shirley Yen; Heather Hower; Christianne Esposito-Smythers; Tina Goldstein; Neal Ryan; Martin Keller Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Janet Wozniak; Michael Monuteaux; Jennifer Richards; Kathryn E Lail; Stephen V Faraone; Joseph Biederman Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Paul Lichtenstein; Benjamin H Yip; Camilla Björk; Yudi Pawitan; Tyrone D Cannon; Patrick F Sullivan; Christina M Hultman Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-01-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Boris Birmaher; John A Merranko; Tina R Goldstein; Mary Kay Gill; Benjamin I Goldstein; Heather Hower; Shirley Yen; Danella Hafeman; Michael Strober; Rasim S Diler; David Axelson; Neal D Ryan; Martin B Keller Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Carrie A H Vaudreuil; Stephen V Faraone; Maura Di Salvo; Janet R Wozniak; Rebecca A Wolenski; Nicholas W Carrellas; Joseph Biederman Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Robert M Post; Benjamin I Goldstein; Boris Birmaher; Robert L Findling; Benicio N Frey; Melissa P DelBello; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 4.839