B G P Koot1, V Nobili2,3. 1. Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Hepato-Metabolic Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy. 3. Hepato-Metabolic Disease Unit and Liver Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in the industrialized world in children. Its high prevalence and important health risks make NAFLD highly suitable for screening. In practice, screening is widely, albeit not consistently, performed. AIM: To review the recommendations on screening for NAFLD in children. METHOD: Recommendations on screening were reviewed from major paediatric obesity guidelines and NAFLD guidelines. A literature overview is provided on open questions and controversies. RESULTS: Screening for NAFLD is advocated in all obesity and most NAFLD guidelines. Guidelines are not uniform in whom to screen, and most guidelines do not specify how screening should be performed in practice. Screening for NAFLD remains controversial, due to lack of a highly accurate screening tool, limited knowledge to predict the natural course of NAFLD and limited data on its cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines provide little guidance on how screening should be performed. Screening for NAFLD remains controversial because not all conditions for screening are fully met. Consensus is needed on the optimal use of currently available screening tools. Research should focus on new accurate screening tool, the natural history of NAFLD and the cost effectiveness of different screening strategies in children.
BACKGROUND:Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in the industrialized world in children. Its high prevalence and important health risks make NAFLD highly suitable for screening. In practice, screening is widely, albeit not consistently, performed. AIM: To review the recommendations on screening for NAFLD in children. METHOD: Recommendations on screening were reviewed from major paediatric obesity guidelines and NAFLD guidelines. A literature overview is provided on open questions and controversies. RESULTS: Screening for NAFLD is advocated in all obesity and most NAFLD guidelines. Guidelines are not uniform in whom to screen, and most guidelines do not specify how screening should be performed in practice. Screening for NAFLD remains controversial, due to lack of a highly accurate screening tool, limited knowledge to predict the natural course of NAFLD and limited data on its cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines provide little guidance on how screening should be performed. Screening for NAFLD remains controversial because not all conditions for screening are fully met. Consensus is needed on the optimal use of currently available screening tools. Research should focus on new accurate screening tool, the natural history of NAFLD and the cost effectiveness of different screening strategies in children.
Authors: R Ellen Jones; Ann Ming Yeh; Neerajah Kambham; Marwa Abu El Haija; Janey Pratt; Matias Bruzoni Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Warren L Shapiro; Elizabeth L Yu; Jennifer C Arin; Karen F Murray; Sabina Ali; Nirav K Desai; Stavra A Xanthakos; Henry C Lin; Naim Alkhouri; Reham Abdou; Stephanie H Abrams; Megan W Butler; Sarah A Faasse; Lynette A Gillis; Timothy A Hadley; Ajay K Jain; Marianne Kavan; Kattayoun Kordy; Peter Lee; Jennifer Panganiban; John F Pohl; Carol Potter; Bryan Rudolph; Shikha S Sundaram; Shivali Joshi; James A Proudfoot; Nidhi P Goyal; Kathryn E Harlow; Kimberly P Newton; Jeffrey B Schwimmer Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Anna Di Sessa; Grazia Cirillo; Stefano Guarino; Pierluigi Marzuillo; Emanuele Miraglia Del Giudice Journal: Pediatric Health Med Ther Date: 2019-08-23
Authors: Laura G Draijer; Sabine Haggenburg; Marc A Benninga; Malika Chegary; Bart G P Koot Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: Maddi Oses; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; María Medrano; Arkaitz Galbete; Emiliano Miranda-Ferrua; Jonatan R Ruiz; Felix Sánchez-Valverde; Francisco B Ortega; Rafael Cabeza; Arantxa Villanueva; Fernando Idoate; Idoia Labayen Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 3.910
Authors: Jurgen H Runge; Jet van Giessen; Laura G Draijer; Eline E Deurloo; Anne M J B Smets; Marc A Benninga; Bart G P Koot; Jaap Stoker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 5.315