Alan D Workman1, Ryan M Carey1, Michael A Kohanski2, David W Kennedy2, James N Palmer2, Nithin D Adappa2, Noam A Cohen2,3. 1. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Division of Rhinology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) is released in the airway as a critical component of innate immune defense against invading pathogenic organisms. It is well documented that bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of NO are concentration-dependent. However, few data exist comparing relative susceptibility of common pathogens to NO at physiologic concentrations. In this study we evaluated the effects of NO on 4 common airway bacteria and 1 fungus, and examined the potential implications of discrepancies in sensitivity. METHODS: Staphylococcus epidermis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans cultures were adjusted to a uniform optical density (OD) and grown in log phase at 37°C with varying concentrations of NO formed by DETA NONOate. Both OD readings and colony forming units (CFUs) were measured at varying time-points to evaluate for inhibitory effects of NO. RESULTS: P aeruginosa and C albicans were significantly more sensitive to NO at physiologic concentrations typical of the human airway. S aureus was attenuated by NO to a lesser degree, and K pneumoniae and S epidermis were more resistant to NO at all concentrations tested. Air surface liquid from cultured human sinonasal epithelial cells had an additive effect in bacterial killing of P aeruginosa, but not in S aureus. CONCLUSION: Common airway pathogens have varying levels of susceptibility to NO at physiologic concentrations of innate immune defense. Relative sensitivity of P aeruginosa and relative resistance of S epidermis may help explain the composition of the healthy microbiome, as well as opportunistic infection in the absence of induced NO release.
BACKGROUND:Nitric oxide (NO) is released in the airway as a critical component of innate immune defense against invading pathogenic organisms. It is well documented that bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of NO are concentration-dependent. However, few data exist comparing relative susceptibility of common pathogens to NO at physiologic concentrations. In this study we evaluated the effects of NO on 4 common airway bacteria and 1 fungus, and examined the potential implications of discrepancies in sensitivity. METHODS:Staphylococcus epidermis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans cultures were adjusted to a uniform optical density (OD) and grown in log phase at 37°C with varying concentrations of NO formed by DETA NONOate. Both OD readings and colony forming units (CFUs) were measured at varying time-points to evaluate for inhibitory effects of NO. RESULTS:P aeruginosa and C albicans were significantly more sensitive to NO at physiologic concentrations typical of the human airway. S aureus was attenuated by NO to a lesser degree, and K pneumoniae and S epidermis were more resistant to NO at all concentrations tested. Air surface liquid from cultured human sinonasal epithelial cells had an additive effect in bacterial killing of P aeruginosa, but not in S aureus. CONCLUSION: Common airway pathogens have varying levels of susceptibility to NO at physiologic concentrations of innate immune defense. Relative sensitivity of P aeruginosa and relative resistance of S epidermis may help explain the composition of the healthy microbiome, as well as opportunistic infection in the absence of induced NO release.
Authors: Jeffrey Shaari; James N Palmer; Alexander G Chiu; Kevin D Judy; Akiva S Cohen; David W Kennedy; Noam A Cohen Journal: Am J Rhinol Date: 2006 Mar-Apr
Authors: Jessica Jones-Carson; James R Laughlin; Amanda L Stewart; Martin I Voskuil; Andrés Vázquez-Torres Journal: Nitric Oxide Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 4.427
Authors: Bjoern O Schroeder; Zhihong Wu; Sabine Nuding; Sandra Groscurth; Moritz Marcinowski; Julia Beisner; Johannes Buchner; Martin Schaller; Eduard F Stange; Jan Wehkamp Journal: Nature Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Li Eon Kuek; Derek B McMahon; Ray Z Ma; Zoey A Miller; Jennifer F Jolivert; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; Robert J Lee Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2022-04-06
Authors: Jenna R Freund; Corrine J Mansfield; Laurel J Doghramji; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; David W Kennedy; Danielle R Reed; Peihua Jiang; Robert J Lee Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Vasiliki Triantafillou; Alan D Workman; Michael A Kohanski; Noam A Cohen Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Mao Wang; Alex G Gauthier; Thomas P Kennedy; Haichao Wang; Uday Kiran Velagapudi; Tanaji T Talele; Mosi Lin; Jiaqi Wu; LeeAnne Daley; Xiaojing Yang; Vivek Patel; Sung Soo Mun; Charles R Ashby; Lin L Mantell Journal: Mol Med Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 6.354