Literature DB >> 28543953

Improved technical success, postnatal outcome and refined predictors of outcome for fetal aortic valvuloplasty.

K G Friedman1,2, L A Sleeper1,2, L R Freud1,2, A C Marshall1,2, M E Godfrey1,2, M Drogosz1, T Lafranchi1, C B Benson3,4, L E Wilkins-Haug3,4, W Tworetzky1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Fetal aortic valvuloplasty (FAV) may prevent progression of mid-gestation aortic stenosis to hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether technical success and biventricular (Biv) outcome after FAV have changed from an earlier (2000-2008) to a more recent (2009-2015) era and identify pre-FAV predictors of Biv outcome.
METHODS: We evaluated procedural and postnatal outcomes in 123 fetuses that underwent FAV for evolving HLHS at Boston Children's Hospital between 2000 and 2015. The primary outcome measure was circulation type (Biv vs single ventricle) at the time of neonatal hospital discharge. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to construct a stratification algorithm to predict Biv circulation based on pre-FAV fetal variables.
RESULTS: The FAV procedure was technically successful in 101/123 (82%) fetuses, with a higher technical success rate in the more recent era than in the earlier one (49/52 (94%) vs 52/71 (73%); P = 0.003). In liveborn patients, the incidence of Biv outcome was higher in the recent than in the earlier era, both in the entire liveborn cohort (29/49 (59%) vs 16/62 (26%); P = 0.001) and in those in whom the procedure was technically successful (27/46 (59%) vs 15/47 (32%); P = 0.007). Independent predictors of Biv outcome were higher left ventricular (LV) pressure, larger ascending aorta, better LV diastolic function and higher LV long-axis Z-score. On CART analysis, fetuses with LV pressure > 47 mmHg and ascending aorta Z-score ≥ 0.57 had a 92% probability of Biv outcome (n = 24). Those with a lower LV pressure, or mitral dimension Z-score < 0.1 and mitral valve inflow time Z-score < -2 (n = 34) were unlikely to have Biv (probability of 9%). The remainder of the patients had an intermediate (∼40-60%) likelihood of Biv circulation.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients achieving Biv outcome after FAV has increased, probably owing to an improved technical success rate and modified selection criteria. Fetal factors, including LV pressure, size of the ascending aorta and diastolic function, are associated with likelihood of Biv circulation after FAV.
Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal cardiac intervention; fetal cardiology; hypoplastic left heart syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28543953     DOI: 10.1002/uog.17530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

1.  Fetal Aortic Valvuloplasty for Evolving Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah S Pickard; John B Wong; Emily M Bucholz; Jane W Newburger; Wayne Tworetzky; Terra Lafranchi; Carol B Benson; Louise E Wilkins-Haug; Diego Porras; Ryan Callahan; Kevin G Friedman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-04-07

Review 2.  Flow-Mediated Factors in the Pathogenesis of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome.

Authors:  Anum Rahman; Rajiv R Chaturvedi; John G Sled
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Foetoscopy-assisted balloon valvuloplasty in a human foetus with disadvantageous intrauterine position: a case report.

Authors:  Thomas Kohl; Ibrahim Akin; Juliane Frommberger; Nadja Riehle; Dietmar Schranz
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-08-15

4.  Intrauterine Valvuloplasty in Severe Aortic Stenosis-A Ten Years Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Adeline Walter; Brigitte Strizek; Eva Christin Weber; Ingo Gottschalk; Annegret Geipel; Ulrike Herberg; Ulrich Gembruch; Christoph Berg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Fetal aortic valvuloplasty: first report of two cases from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Merna Atiyah; Ahmed Kurdi; Osama Al Tuwaijry; Atif Al Sahari; Maha Al Rakaf; Inas Babic; Fahad Al Habshan; Zohair Alhalees; Khalid Al Najashi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Prenatal cardiac care: Goals, priorities & gaps in knowledge in fetal cardiovascular disease: Perspectives of the Fetal Heart Society.

Authors:  Nelangi M Pinto; Shaine A Morris; Anita J Moon-Grady; Mary T Donofrio
Journal:  Prog Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-17

7.  Biomechanics of Human Fetal Hearts with Critical Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Chi Wei Ong; Meifeng Ren; Hadi Wiputra; Joy Mojumder; Wei Xuan Chan; Andreas Tulzer; Gerald Tulzer; Martin Lindsay Buist; Citra Nurfarah Zaini Mattar; Lik Chuan Lee; Choon Hwai Yap
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Mending a broken heart: In vitro, in vivo and in silico models of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Abdul Jalil Rufaihah; Ching Kit Chen; Choon Hwai Yap; Citra N Z Mattar
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 5.758

9.  Valvuloplasty in 103 fetuses with critical aortic stenosis: outcome and new predictors for postnatal circulation.

Authors:  A Tulzer; W Arzt; R Gitter; E Sames-Dolzer; M Kreuzer; R Mair; G Tulzer
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 8.678

Review 10.  Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Is There a Role for Fetal Therapy?

Authors:  Andreas Tulzer; James C Huhta; Julian Hochpoechler; Kathrin Holzer; Thomas Karas; David Kielmayer; Gerald Tulzer
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.569

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.