Literature DB >> 28543867

An age-dependent fitness cost of migration? Old trans-Saharan migrating spoonbills breed later than those staying in Europe, and late breeders have lower recruitment.

Tamar Lok1,2, Linde Veldhoen1, Otto Overdijk3, Joost M Tinbergen1, Theunis Piersma1,4.   

Abstract

Migration is a widespread phenomenon in the animal kingdom. On the basis of the considerable variation that exists between and within species, and even within populations, we may be able to infer the (age- and sex-specific) ecological trade-offs and constraints moulding migration systems from assessments of fitness associated with migration and wintering in different areas. During three consecutive breeding seasons, we compared the reproductive performance (timing of breeding, breeding success, chick body condition and post-fledging survival) of Eurasian spoonbills Platalea leucorodia that breed at a single breeding site in The Netherlands, but migrate different distances (c. 4,500 vs. 2,000 km, either or not crossing the Sahara) to and from wintering areas in southern Europe and West Africa. Using mark-recapture analysis, we further investigated whether survival until adulthood (recruitment probability) of chicks hatched between 2006 and 2010 was related to their hatch date and body condition. Long-distance migrants bred later, particularly the males, and raised chicks of poorer body condition than short-distance migrants. Hatch dates strongly advanced with increasing age in short-distance migrants, but hardly advanced in long-distance migrants, causing the difference in timing of breeding between long- and short-distance migrants to be more pronounced among older birds. Breeding success and chick body condition decreased over the season, and chicks that fledged late in the season or in poor condition were less likely to survive until adulthood. As a result, long-distance migrants-particularly the males and older birds-likely recruit fewer offspring into the breeding population than short-distance migrants. This inference is important for predicting the population-level consequences of changes in winter habitat suitability throughout the wintering range. Assuming that the long-distance migrants-being the birds that occupy the traditional wintering areas-are not the poorer quality birds, and that the observed age-dependent patterns in timing of breeding are driven by within-individual effects and not by selective disappearance, our results suggest that the strategy of long-distance migration, involving the crossing of the Sahara to winter in West Africa, incurred a cost by reducing reproductive output, albeit a cost paid only later in life.
© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breeding success; carry-over effect; evolution; life history; migration; post-fledging survival; recruitment; timing of breeding; wintering site

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28543867     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  How migratory populations become resident.

Authors:  Tiago de Zoeten; Francisco Pulido
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  High-resolution GPS tracking reveals sex differences in migratory behaviour and stopover habitat use in the Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus.

Authors:  Jan M Baert; Eric W M Stienen; Brigitte C Heylen; Marwa M Kavelaars; Roland-Jan Buijs; Judy Shamoun-Baranes; Luc Lens; Wendt Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Mortality limits used in wind energy impact assessment underestimate impacts of wind farms on bird populations.

Authors:  Peter Schippers; Ralph Buij; Alex Schotman; Jana Verboom; Henk van der Jeugd; Eelke Jongejans
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Why do earlier-arriving migratory birds have better breeding success?

Authors:  Catriona A Morrison; José A Alves; Tómas G Gunnarsson; Böðvar Þórisson; Jennifer A Gill
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Population and evolutionary dynamics in spatially structured seasonally varying environments.

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Justin M J Travis; Francis Daunt; Sarah J Burthe; Sarah Wanless; Calvin Dytham
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-03-25

6.  Carryover effects of long-distance avian migration are weaker than effects of breeding environment in a partially migratory bird.

Authors:  Claire Buchan; James J Gilroy; Inês Catry; Javier Bustamante; Alina D Marca; Philip W Atkinson; Juan Miguel González; Aldina M A Franco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of pair migratory behavior on breeding phenology and success in a partially migratory shorebird population.

Authors:  Verónica Méndez; Jose A Alves; Jennifer A Gill; Böðvar Þórisson; Camilio Carneiro; Aldís E Pálsdóttir; Sölvi R Vignisson; Tomas G Gunnarsson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.