Anna Folino1, Marco Benzo2, Paolo Pasquero3, Andrea Laguzzi3, Luca Mesin2, Alessandro Messere1, Massimo Porta3, Silvestro Roatta1. 1. Integrative Physiology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Torino, Italy. 2. Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Mathematical Biology and Physiology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy. 3. Department of Medical Sciences, AOU San Giovanni Battista, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Respirophasic variation of inferior vena cava (IVC) size is affected by large variability with spontaneous breathing. This study aims at characterizing the dependence of IVC size on controlled changes in intrathoracic pressure. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects, in supine position, performed controlled isovolumetric respiratory efforts at functional residual capacity, attaining positive (5, 10, and 15 mmHg) and negative (-5, -10, and -15 mmHg) alveolar pressure levels. The isovolumetric constraint implies that equivalent changes are exhibited by alveolar and intrathoracic pressures during respiratory tasks. RESULTS: The IVC cross-sectional area equal to 2.88 ± 0.43 cm2 at baseline (alveolar pressure = 0 mmHg) was progressively decreased by both expiratory and inspiratory efforts of increasing strength, with diaphragmatic efforts producing larger effects than thoracic ones: -55 ± 15% decrease, at +15 mmHg of alveolar pressure (P < .01), -80 ± 33 ± 12% at -15 mmHg diaphragmatic (P < .01), -33 ± 12% at -15 mmHg thoracic. Significant IVC changes in size (P < .01) and pulsatility (P < .05), along with non significant reduction in the response to respiratory efforts, were also observed during the first 30 minutes of supine rest, detecting an increase in vascular filling, and taking place after switching from the standing to the supine position. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified the dependence of the IVC cross-sectional area on controlled intrathoracic pressure changes and evidenced the stronger influence of diaphragmatic over thoracic activity. Individual variability in thoracic/diaphragmatic respiratory pattern should be considered in the interpretation of the respirophasic modulations of IVC size.
OBJECTIVES: Respirophasic variation of inferior vena cava (IVC) size is affected by large variability with spontaneous breathing. This study aims at characterizing the dependence of IVC size on controlled changes in intrathoracic pressure. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects, in supine position, performed controlled isovolumetric respiratory efforts at functional residual capacity, attaining positive (5, 10, and 15 mmHg) and negative (-5, -10, and -15 mmHg) alveolar pressure levels. The isovolumetric constraint implies that equivalent changes are exhibited by alveolar and intrathoracic pressures during respiratory tasks. RESULTS: The IVC cross-sectional area equal to 2.88 ± 0.43 cm2 at baseline (alveolar pressure = 0 mmHg) was progressively decreased by both expiratory and inspiratory efforts of increasing strength, with diaphragmatic efforts producing larger effects than thoracic ones: -55 ± 15% decrease, at +15 mmHg of alveolar pressure (P < .01), -80 ± 33 ± 12% at -15 mmHg diaphragmatic (P < .01), -33 ± 12% at -15 mmHg thoracic. Significant IVC changes in size (P < .01) and pulsatility (P < .05), along with non significant reduction in the response to respiratory efforts, were also observed during the first 30 minutes of supine rest, detecting an increase in vascular filling, and taking place after switching from the standing to the supine position. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified the dependence of the IVC cross-sectional area on controlled intrathoracic pressure changes and evidenced the stronger influence of diaphragmatic over thoracic activity. Individual variability in thoracic/diaphragmatic respiratory pattern should be considered in the interpretation of the respirophasic modulations of IVC size.
Authors: Luca Mesin; Stefano Albani; Piero Policastro; Paolo Pasquero; Massimo Porta; Chiara Melchiorri; Gianluca Leonardi; Carlo Albera; Paolo Scacciatella; Pierpaolo Pellicori; Davide Stolfo; Andrea Grillo; Bruno Fabris; Roberto Bini; Alberto Giannoni; Antonio Pepe; Leonardo Ermini; Stefano Seddone; Gianfranco Sinagra; Francesco Antonini-Canterin; Silvestro Roatta Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-01-21