Hanne Søberg Finbråten1,2, Kjell Sverre Pettersen3, Bodil Wilde-Larsson1,2, Gun Nordström4, Anne Trollvik4, Øystein Guttersrud5. 1. Faculty of Public Health, Department of Dental Care and Public Health, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway. 2. Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden. 3. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway. 4. Faculty of Public Health, Department of Nursing, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway. 5. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Norwegian Centre for Science Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
AIM: To validate the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BACKGROUND: The HLS-EU-Q47 latent variable is outlined in a framework with four cognitive domains integrated in three health domains, implying 12 theoretically defined subscales. Valid and reliable health literacy measurers are crucial to effectively adapt health communication and education to individuals and groups of patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study applying confirmatory latent trait analyses. METHODS: Using a paper-and-pencil self-administered approach, 388 adults responded in March 2015. The data were analysed using the Rasch methodology and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Response violation (response dependency) and trait violation (multidimensionality) of local independence were identified. Fitting the "multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit" model, 1-, 3- and 12-dimensional Rasch models were applied and compared. Poor model fit and differential item functioning were present in some items, and several subscales suffered from poor targeting and low reliability. Despite multidimensional data, we did not observe any unordered response categories. CONCLUSION: Interpreting the domains as distinct but related latent dimensions, the data fit a 12-dimensional Rasch model and a 12-factor confirmatory factor model best. Therefore, the analyses did not support the estimation of one overall "health literacy score." To support the plausibility of claims based on the HLS-EU score(s), we suggest: removing the health care aspect to reduce the magnitude of multidimensionality; rejecting redundant items to avoid response dependency; adding "harder" items and applying a six-point rating scale to improve subscale targeting and reliability; and revising items to improve model fit and avoid bias owing to person factors.
AIM: To validate the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BACKGROUND: The HLS-EU-Q47 latent variable is outlined in a framework with four cognitive domains integrated in three health domains, implying 12 theoretically defined subscales. Valid and reliable health literacy measurers are crucial to effectively adapt health communication and education to individuals and groups of patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study applying confirmatory latent trait analyses. METHODS: Using a paper-and-pencil self-administered approach, 388 adults responded in March 2015. The data were analysed using the Rasch methodology and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Response violation (response dependency) and trait violation (multidimensionality) of local independence were identified. Fitting the "multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit" model, 1-, 3- and 12-dimensional Rasch models were applied and compared. Poor model fit and differential item functioning were present in some items, and several subscales suffered from poor targeting and low reliability. Despite multidimensional data, we did not observe any unordered response categories. CONCLUSION: Interpreting the domains as distinct but related latent dimensions, the data fit a 12-dimensional Rasch model and a 12-factor confirmatory factor model best. Therefore, the analyses did not support the estimation of one overall "health literacy score." To support the plausibility of claims based on the HLS-EU score(s), we suggest: removing the health care aspect to reduce the magnitude of multidimensionality; rejecting redundant items to avoid response dependency; adding "harder" items and applying a six-point rating scale to improve subscale targeting and reliability; and revising items to improve model fit and avoid bias owing to person factors.
Authors: Olga Maria Domanska; Torsten Michael Bollweg; Anne-Kathrin Loer; Christine Holmberg; Liane Schenk; Susanne Jordan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Marija Jovanić; Marija Zdravković; Dejana Stanisavljević; Aleksandra Jović Vraneš Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad; Randi Andenaes; Astrid K Wahl; Lisbeth G Kvarme; Sølvi Helseth; Torbjørn Moum Journal: Health Lit Res Pract Date: 2020-10-08
Authors: Rafael Vila-Candel; Francisco Miguel Martínez-Arnau; Juan María de la Cámara-de Las Heras; Enrique Castro-Sánchez; Pilar Pérez-Ros Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.390