Literature DB >> 28543095

Psychological mechanisms and the ups and downs of personal recovery in bipolar disorder.

Alyson L Dodd1,2, Barbara Mezes2, Fiona Lobban2, Steven H Jones2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personal recovery is recognized as an important outcome for individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) and is distinct from symptomatic and functional recovery. Recovery-focused psychological therapies show promise. As with therapies aiming to delay relapse and improve symptoms, research on the psychological mechanisms underlying recovery is crucial to inform effective recovery-focused therapy. However, empirical work is limited. This study investigated whether negative beliefs about mood swings and self-referent appraisals of mood-related experiences were negatively associated with personal recovery.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey.
METHOD: People with a verified research diagnosis of BD (n = 87), recruited via relevant voluntary sector organizations and social media, completed online measures. Pearson's correlations and multiple regression analysed associations between appraisals, beliefs, and recovery.
RESULTS: Normalizing appraisals of mood changes were positively associated with personal recovery. Depression, negative self-appraisals of depression-relevant experiences, extreme positive and negative appraisals of activated states, and negative beliefs about mood swings had negative relationships with recovery. After controlling for current mood symptoms, negative illness models (relating to how controllable, long-term, concerning, and treatable mood swings are; β = -.38), being employed (β = .39), and both current (β = -.53) and recent experience of depression (β = .30) predicted recovery. LIMITATIONS: Due to the cross-sectional design, causality cannot be determined. Participants were a convenience sample primarily recruited online. Power was limited by the sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions aiming to empower people to feel able to manage mood and catastrophize less about mood swings could facilitate personal recovery in people with BD, which might be achieved in recovery-focused therapy. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Personal recovery is an important outcome for people living with bipolar disorder More positive illness models are associated with better personal recovery in bipolar disorder, over and above mood symptoms Recovery-focused therapy should focus on developing positive illness models Recovery-focused therapy should address personally meaningful goals such as gaining employment.
© 2017 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appraisals; bipolar disorder; depression; illness perceptions; mania; psychological processes; recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28543095     DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6657


  5 in total

1.  Exploring the Personal Recovery Construct in Bipolar Disorders: Definition, Usage and Measurement. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marion Chirio-Espitalier; Benoit Schreck; Melanie Duval; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Leila Moret; Marie Grall Bronnec
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 2.  Relationship Between Illness Representations, Psychosocial Adjustment, and Treatment Outcomes in Mental Disorders: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Priscillia Averous; Elodie Charbonnier; Lionel Dany
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-12

3.  Use of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in defining functional recovery in bipolar I disorder. Post-hoc analyses of long-term studies of aripiprazole once monthly as maintenance treatment.

Authors:  Jessica Madera; Pedro Such; Peter Zhang; Ross A Baker; Iria Grande
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.570

4.  Differences in beliefs about mood between people with and without bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Heather Robinson; Steven Jones; Thomas Fanshawe; Fiona Lobban
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2019-08-14

5.  Social media recruitment for mental health research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Catherine Sanchez; Adrienne Grzenda; Andrea Varias; Alik S Widge; Linda L Carpenter; William M McDonald; Charles B Nemeroff; Ned H Kalin; Glenn Martin; Mauricio Tohen; Maria Filippou-Frye; Drew Ramsey; Eleni Linos; Christina Mangurian; Carolyn I Rodriguez
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.735

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.