| Literature DB >> 28542799 |
Daniel Scharfstein1, Aidan McDermott1, Iván Díaz2, Marco Carone3, Nicola Lunardon4, Ibrahim Turkoz5.
Abstract
In practice, both testable and untestable assumptions are generally required to draw inference about the mean outcome measured at the final scheduled visit in a repeated measures study with drop-out. Scharfstein et al. (2014) proposed a sensitivity analysis methodology to determine the robustness of conclusions within a class of untestable assumptions. In their approach, the untestable and testable assumptions were guaranteed to be compatible; their testable assumptions were based on a fully parametric model for the distribution of the observable data. While convenient, these parametric assumptions have proven especially restrictive in empirical research. Here, we relax their distributional assumptions and provide a more flexible, semi-parametric approach. We illustrate our proposal in the context of a randomized trial for evaluating a treatment of schizoaffective disorder.Entities:
Keywords: Bootstrap; Cross-validation; Exponential tilting; Identifiability; Jackknife; One-step estimator; Plug-in estimator; Selection bias
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28542799 DOI: 10.1111/biom.12729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometrics ISSN: 0006-341X Impact factor: 2.571