| Literature DB >> 28542406 |
Rens Braster1, Simran Grewal1,2, Remco Visser3, Helga K Einarsdottir3, Marjolein van Egmond1,2, Gestur Vidarsson3, Marijn Bögels1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current anti-cancer therapeutic antibodies that are used in the clinic are predominantly humanized or fully human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1). These antibodies bind with high affinity to the target antigen and are efficient in activating the immune system via IgG Fc receptors and/or complement. In addition to IgG1, three more isotypes are present in humans, of which IgG3 has been found to be superior compared to human IgG1 in inducing antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC), phagocytosis or activation of complement in some models. Nonetheless, no therapeutic human IgG3 mAbs have been developed due to the short in vivo half-life of most known IgG3 allotypes. In this manuscript, we compared the efficacy of V-gene matched IgG1 and IgG3 anti-tumour mAb (TA99) in mice, using natural variants of human IgG3 with short- or long half-life, differing only at position 435 with an arginine or histidine, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28542406 PMCID: PMC5438146 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Generation of human IgG1 and IgG3 TA99 mAb with histidine-arginine rearrangements in Fc domains at amino acid position 435.
Human IgG1 was mutated to contain an arginine at position 435 (IgG1 H435R), whereas the arginine at position 435 in human IgG3 was changed to histidine (IgG3 R435H). (A) Specific anti-human IgG1 or (B) anti-human IgG3 ELISA confirmed the correct isotype of mAbs. Staining of B16F10-gp75 with (C) different human TA99 mAb and (D) mouse TA99 IgG2a confirmed binding to surface gp75 and equal binding efficiency to gp75 of all human TA99 mAb. Concentration curves of human IgG1 and IgG3 mAb (E) and mouse IgG2a TA99 (F) on B16F10-gp75. Of note, scales of human (E) and mouse (F) antibodies are different.
Fig 2Cytotoxicity assays using murine macrophages and B16F10-gp75 tumour cells.
(A) Remaining B16F10-gp75 cells after a 24 hour incubation with macrophages and 2 μg/ml TA99 mAbs (different isotypes). (B) FACS analysis of co-cultures of DiO labelled murine macrophages (FL1) and DiI labelled B16F10-gp75 (FL2) tumour cells after 24 hours of treatment with 1 μg/ml mouse IgG2a or human IgG1 or IgG3 TA99 mAb. Macrophages, which have phagocytosed B16F10-gp75 tumour cells are encircled in FACS plots. (C) Percentage of remaining viable tumour cells and (D) increase in number of macrophages, which have phagocytosed B16F10-gp75 tumour cells after treatment of co-cultures with different concentrations of mAb. Percentages of tumour cells after culture with isotype antibodies were set at 100%. Double-positive macrophages were depicted relative to the co-cultures with isotype antibodies (set to 1), as described previously [4]. Mouse MG4 or human HEPC mAb were used as isotypes controls, which were set to 100%. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
Fig 3Prevention of B16F10-gp75 metastases development with different TA99 isotype antibodies.
Mice received peritoneal injections with 50μg mAb/mouse 4 days prior to peritoneal injection of B16F10-gp75 tumour cells. Metastases outgrowth after treatment with TA99 mouse IgG2a or (modified) human IgG1, human IgG3 mAbs was determined 14 days post tumour cell injection. **P<0.01, ****p<0.0001.