Literature DB >> 28542017

Children With Single-Sided Deafness Use Their Cochlear Implant.

Melissa Jane Polonenko1, Blake Croll Papsin, Karen Ann Gordon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptance of a cochlear implant (CI) by children with single-sided deafness (SSD) as measured by duration of CI use across daily listening environments.
DESIGN: Datalogs for 7 children aged 1.1 to 14.5 years (mean ± SD: 5.9 ± 5.9 years old), who had SSD and were implanted in their deaf ear, were anonymized and extracted from their CI processors. Data for all available follow-up clinical appointments were included, ranging from two to six visits. Measures calculated from each datalog included frequency and duration of time the coil disconnected from the internal device, average daily CI use, and both duration (hr/day) and percentage of CI use (% daily use) in different intensity ranges and environment types. Linear mixed effects regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between CI experience, daily CI use, frequency of coil-offs, and duration of coil-off time. Nonlinear regression analyses were used to evaluate CI use with age in different acoustic environments.
RESULTS: Children with SSD used their CI on average 7.4 hr/day. Older children used their CI for longer periods of the day than younger children. Longitudinal data indicated consistent CI use from the date of CI activation. Frequency of coil-offs reduced with CI experience, but did not significantly contribute to hours of coil-off time. Children used their CI longest in environments that were moderately loud (50 to 70 dB A) and classified as containing speech-in-noise. Preschoolers tended to spend less time in quiet but more time in music than infants/toddlers and adolescents.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with SSD consistently use their CI upon activation in a variety of environments commonly experienced by children. CI use in children with SSD resembles reported bilateral hearing aid use in children but is longer than reported hearing aid use in children with less severe unilateral hearing loss, suggesting that (1) the normal-hearing ear did not detract from consistent CI use; and (2) a greater asymmetry between ears presents a significant impairment that may facilitate device use to access bilateral sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28542017     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  11 in total

1.  Benefits of Cochlear Implantation in Childhood Unilateral Hearing Loss (CUHL Trial).

Authors:  Kevin D Brown; Margaret T Dillon; Lisa R Park
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.970

2.  Longitudinal auditory data of children with prelingual single-sided deafness managed with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Tine Arras; An Boudewyns; Freya Swinnen; Andrzej Zarowski; Birgit Philips; Christian Desloovere; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Sound-localization performance of patients with single-sided deafness is not improved when listening with a bone-conduction device.

Authors:  Martijn J H Agterberg; Ad F M Snik; Rens M G Van de Goor; Myrthe K S Hol; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Cortical organization restored by cochlear implantation in young children with single sided deafness.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Polonenko; Karen Ann Gordon; Sharon Lynn Cushing; Blake Croll Papsin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Consistent and chronic cochlear implant use partially reverses cortical effects of single sided deafness in children.

Authors:  Hyo-Jeong Lee; Daniel Smieja; Melissa Jane Polonenko; Sharon Lynn Cushing; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Long-term results of cochlear implantation in children with congenital single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Rauch; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Rainer Beck; Iva Speck; Manuel Christoph Ketterer; Till Fabian Jakob; Frederike Hassepass
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; J Thomas Roland; Denise Thomas; Kristin Uhler; Lindsay Zombek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 8.  The Importance of Access to Bilateral Hearing through Cochlear Implants in Children.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Blake C Papsin; Vicky Papaioannou; Sharon L Cushing
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-12-09

9.  Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

10.  Limiting asymmetric hearing improves benefits of bilateral hearing in children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Polonenko; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.