Eva Serhal1,2, Allison Crawford1,3, Joyce Cheng1,2,4, Paul Kurdyak1,2,3,4. 1. 1 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario. 2. 2 Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. 3. 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. 4. 4 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Rural areas in Ontario have fewer psychiatrists, making access to specialist mental health care challenging. Our objective was to characterise psychiatrists delivering and patients receiving telepsychiatry in Ontario and to determine the number of patients who accessed a psychiatrist via telepsychiatry following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation. METHOD: We conducted a serial panel study to evaluate the characteristics of psychiatrists providing telepsychiatry from April 2007 to March 2013. In addition, we conducted a cross-sectional study for fiscal year 2012-2013 to examine telepsychiatry patient characteristics and create an in-need patient cohort of individuals with a recent psychiatric hospitalisation that assessed if they had follow-up with a psychiatrist in person or through telepsychiatry within 1 year of discharge. RESULTS: In fiscal year 2012-2013, a total of 3801 people had 5635 telepsychiatry visits, and 7% ( n = 138) of Ontario psychiatrists provided telepsychiatry. Of the 48,381 people identified as in need of psychiatric care, 60% saw a local psychiatrist, 39% saw no psychiatrist, and less than 1% saw a psychiatrist through telepsychiatry only or telepsychiatry in addition to local psychiatry within a year. Three northern regions had more than 50% of in-need patients fail to access psychiatry within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, relatively few patients and psychiatrists use telepsychiatry. In addition, patients scarcely access telepsychiatry for posthospitalisation follow-up. This study, which serves as a preliminary baseline for telepsychiatry in Ontario, demonstrates that telepsychiatry has not evolved systematically to address need and highlights the importance of system-level planning when implementing telepsychiatry to optimise access to care.
OBJECTIVE: Rural areas in Ontario have fewer psychiatrists, making access to specialist mental health care challenging. Our objective was to characterise psychiatrists delivering and patients receiving telepsychiatry in Ontario and to determine the number of patients who accessed a psychiatrist via telepsychiatry following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation. METHOD: We conducted a serial panel study to evaluate the characteristics of psychiatrists providing telepsychiatry from April 2007 to March 2013. In addition, we conducted a cross-sectional study for fiscal year 2012-2013 to examine telepsychiatry patient characteristics and create an in-need patient cohort of individuals with a recent psychiatric hospitalisation that assessed if they had follow-up with a psychiatrist in person or through telepsychiatry within 1 year of discharge. RESULTS: In fiscal year 2012-2013, a total of 3801 people had 5635 telepsychiatry visits, and 7% ( n = 138) of Ontario psychiatrists provided telepsychiatry. Of the 48,381 people identified as in need of psychiatric care, 60% saw a local psychiatrist, 39% saw no psychiatrist, and less than 1% saw a psychiatrist through telepsychiatry only or telepsychiatry in addition to local psychiatry within a year. Three northern regions had more than 50% of in-need patients fail to access psychiatry within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, relatively few patients and psychiatrists use telepsychiatry. In addition, patients scarcely access telepsychiatry for posthospitalisation follow-up. This study, which serves as a preliminary baseline for telepsychiatry in Ontario, demonstrates that telepsychiatry has not evolved systematically to address need and highlights the importance of system-level planning when implementing telepsychiatry to optimise access to care.
Authors: Jane E Hamilton; Howard Rhoades; Juan Galvez; Melissa Allen; Charles Green; Mildred Aller; Jair C Soares Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Donald M Hilty; Daphne C Ferrer; Michelle Burke Parish; Barb Johnston; Edward J Callahan; Peter M Yellowlees Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: David Gratzer; John Torous; Raymond W Lam; Scott B Patten; Stanley Kutcher; Steven Chan; Daniel Vigo; Kathleen Pajer; Lakshmi N Yatham Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Stefan Rennick-Egglestone; Kate Morgan; Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley; Amy Ramsay; Rose McGranahan; Steve Gillard; Ada Hui; Fiona Ng; Justine Schneider; Susie Booth; Vanessa Pinfold; Larry Davidson; Donna Franklin; Simon Bradstreet; Simone Arbour; Mike Slade Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Sonia Johnson; Christian Dalton-Locke; John Baker; Charlotte Hanlon; Tatiana Taylor Salisbury; Matt Fossey; Karen Newbigging; Sarah E Carr; Jennifer Hensel; Giuseppe Carrà; Urs Hepp; Constanza Caneo; Justin J Needle; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Rebecca Robillard; Alexander R Daros; Jennifer L Phillips; Meggan Porteous; Mysa Saad; Marie-Helene Pennestri; Tetyana Kendzerska; Jodi D Edwards; Elizaveta Solomonova; Rajiv Bhatla; Roger Godbout; Zachary Kaminsky; Addo Boafo; Lena C Quilty Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Mike Slade; Stefan Rennick-Egglestone; Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley; Caroline Yeo; James Roe; Sylvia Bailey; Roger Andrew Smith; Susie Booth; Julian Harrison; Adaresh Bhogal; Patricia Penas Morán; Ada Hui; Dania Quadri; Clare Robinson; Melanie Smuk; Marianne Farkas; Larry Davidson; Lian van der Krieke; Emily Slade; Carmel Bond; Joe Nicholson; Andrew Grundy; Ashleigh Charles; Laurie Hare-Duke; Kristian Pollock; Fiona Ng Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2021-05-27