Literature DB >> 28541166

Moral Bioenhancement and Free Will: Continuing the Debate.

Vojin Rakić.   

Abstract

This article continues and expands differences I have with Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu concerning issues of moral bioenhancement and free will. They have criticized my conception of voluntary moral bioenhancement, claiming that it ignores the extent to which freedom is a matter of degree. Here, I argue that freedom as a political concept (or as one that is analogous to a political concept) is indeed scalar in nature, but that freedom of the will is to be understood as a threshold concept and therefore not as subject to degree. Consequently, I contend, by asserting that freedom is a matter of degree, that Persson and Savulescu have not undermined my arguments favoring voluntary moral enhancement. In addition, I add three further arguments against compulsory moral bioenhancement.

Keywords:  Ingmar Persson; Julian Savulescu; compulsory moral bioenhancement; enhancement; free will; voluntary moral bioenhancement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28541166     DOI: 10.1017/S0963180116001043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics        ISSN: 0963-1801            Impact factor:   1.284


  2 in total

1.  Incentivized goodness.

Authors:  Vojin Rakić
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-09

2.  Citizenship as the exception to the rule: an addendum.

Authors:  Tyler L Jaynes
Journal:  AI Soc       Date:  2020-11-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.