Georgia Keramida1, A Michael Peters2. 1. 1 Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK. 2. 2 Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT, hepatic standardized uptake value (SUV) is reduced through "signal dilution" by hepatic fat. The maximum SUV (SUVmax) is less affected than the mean SUV (SUVmean), therefore SUVmax/SUVmean correlates with hepatic fat. The SUV can be corrected for signal dilution using an equation relating CT density (CTD) to %fat. The objective was to exploit the relationship between SUV indices and CTD to assess the validity of two previously published equations (one linear and one sigmoid) for estimating %fat from CTD and two new exponential equations. METHODS: Study population comprised 465 patients having routine fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT. The SUVmax, SUVmean and CTD were measured from a 3-cm-diameter region of interest over the liver. The exponential equations assumed that 100% fat corresponds to CTD of -50 or -100 HU. The proportion of liver occupied by fat (PF) was estimated from all four equations. Then fat-corrected SUVmean is SUVmean/(1 - PF). The ideal equation should give SUVmean approaching but not exceeding SUVmax and give fat-corrected SUVmean/SUVmax that shows no correlation with CTD. RESULTS: The linear equation failed at CTD values exceeding 55.8 HU because it gave negative PF values. Moreover, fat-corrected SUVmean/SUVmax still correlated with CTD. The sigmoid equation grossly overcorrected SUVmean at low CTD. The exponential equations abolished the correlation between fat-corrected SUVmean/SUVmax and CTD. CONCLUSION: The sigmoid equation is unsuitable for estimating %fat from CTD. The linear equation performed well, but the exponential equation assuming that 100% fat corresponds to -50 HU performed best. Advances in knowledge: Improved (exponential) equations to estimate hepatic fat from hepatic CTD.
OBJECTIVE: In fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT, hepatic standardized uptake value (SUV) is reduced through "signal dilution" by hepatic fat. The maximum SUV (SUVmax) is less affected than the mean SUV (SUVmean), therefore SUVmax/SUVmean correlates with hepatic fat. The SUV can be corrected for signal dilution using an equation relating CT density (CTD) to %fat. The objective was to exploit the relationship between SUV indices and CTD to assess the validity of two previously published equations (one linear and one sigmoid) for estimating %fat from CTD and two new exponential equations. METHODS: Study population comprised 465 patients having routine fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT. The SUVmax, SUVmean and CTD were measured from a 3-cm-diameter region of interest over the liver. The exponential equations assumed that 100% fat corresponds to CTD of -50 or -100 HU. The proportion of liver occupied by fat (PF) was estimated from all four equations. Then fat-corrected SUVmean is SUVmean/(1 - PF). The ideal equation should give SUVmean approaching but not exceeding SUVmax and give fat-corrected SUVmean/SUVmax that shows no correlation with CTD. RESULTS: The linear equation failed at CTD values exceeding 55.8 HU because it gave negative PF values. Moreover, fat-corrected SUVmean/SUVmax still correlated with CTD. The sigmoid equation grossly overcorrected SUVmean at low CTD. The exponential equations abolished the correlation between fat-corrected SUVmean/SUVmax and CTD. CONCLUSION: The sigmoid equation is unsuitable for estimating %fat from CTD. The linear equation performed well, but the exponential equation assuming that 100% fat corresponds to -50 HU performed best. Advances in knowledge: Improved (exponential) equations to estimate hepatic fat from hepatic CTD.
Authors: C Ricci; R Longo; E Gioulis; M Bosco; P Pollesello; F Masutti; L S Crocè; S Paoletti; B de Bernard; C Tiribelli; L Dalla Palma Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Cody J Boyce; Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Andrew J Taylor; Thomas C Winter; Richard J Bruce; Mary J Lindstrom; J Louis Hinshaw Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Yoshihisa Kodama; Chaan S Ng; Tsung T Wu; Gregory D Ayers; Steven A Curley; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Chusilp Charnsangavej Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.959