| Literature DB >> 28540643 |
Euloge S Adjou1, René G Dègnon2, Edwige Dahouenon-Ahoussi2, Mohamed M Soumanou2, Dominique C K Sohounhloue2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the essential oil extracted from fresh leaves of Pimenta racemosa in the improvement of fermented fish flour producing technology. Essential oil of Pimenta racemosa was extracted by hydrodistillation and its chemical composition was determined by GC and GC/MS. Different types of fermented fish flours from Lesser African Threadfin (Galeoides decadactylus) were produced by the modification of the traditional processing technology and the introduction of a step of essential oil adjunction during the process. Three different essential oil concentrations (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 μL g-1) were investigated. Physicochemical, microbiological and nutritional analyzes were performed in order to evaluate the quality of the fermented fish flour produced. Results obtained revealed that the essential oil of Pimenta racemosa investigated has a chemical composition characterized by the presence of myrcene (25.1%), chavicol (7.5%) and eugenol (51.1%). Fermented fish flour produced have a good nutritional potential. However, on the microbiological level, only samples produced by adjunction of essential oil have a low level of microbial contamination, with an absence of pathogenic microorganisms.Entities:
Keywords: Benin; Essential oil; Fermented fish; Galeoides decadactylus; Pimenta racemosa; Process
Year: 2017 PMID: 28540643 PMCID: PMC5507808 DOI: 10.1007/s13659-017-0132-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Prod Bioprospect ISSN: 2192-2209
Chemical composition of essential oil of Pimenta racemosa investigated
| Components | Kovats index (KI) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| α-pinène | 940 | 0.4 |
| octèn-3-ol | 974 | 2.4 |
| β-pinène | 982 | 0.1 |
| myrcène | 993 | 25.1 |
| α-terpinène | 1018 | 0.1 |
| p-cymène | 1022 | 0.7 |
| limonène | 1034 | 3.0 |
| 1,8-cinéole | 1041 | 2.7 |
| ( | 1043 | 0.2 |
| γ-terpinène | 1058 | 0.1 |
| terpinolène | 1089 | 0.2 |
| linalol | 1092 | 0.6 |
| terpinène-4-ol | 1178 | 0.8 |
| α-terpinéol | 1188 | 0.7 |
| chavicol | 1250 | 7.5 |
| eugénol | 1368 | 51.1 |
| β-caryophyllène | 1440 | 0.1 |
| α-humulène | 1489 | 0.1 |
| ( | 1502 | 0.2 |
| δ-cadinène | 1533 | 0.1 |
| torréyol | 1638 | 0.1 |
| T-cadinol | 1665 | 0.1 |
| diterpène (M+=272) | 1941 | 0.6 |
| diterpène (M+=272) | 1981 | 0.2 |
| Total | 96.4 |
Physicochemical characteristics of different types of fermented fish flours investigated
| Fermented fish flours | Moisture (%) | pH | Acidity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 13.26 ± 0.11a | 6.38 ± 0.03a | 1.47 ± 0.09a |
| B | 13.83 ± 0.09a | 6.31 ± 0.06a | 1.29 ± 0.02a |
| C | 13.41 ± 0.07a | 6.22 ± 0.04a | 1.16 ± 0.06a |
| D (Control) | 14.06 ± 0.01a | 6.17 ± 0.02a | 1.81 ± 0.05a |
Values are mean (n = 3) ± SE. The means followed by same letter in the same column are not significantly different according to ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple Comparison tests
Nutritional characteristics of different types of fermented fish flours investigated
| Fermented fish flours | Protein (%) | Ash (%) | Sodium (%) | Potassium (%) | Calcium (%) | Magnesium (%) | Iron (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 23.16 ± 0.07a | 24.17 ± 0.04a | 1.46 ± 0.07a | 0.69 ± 0.03a | 2.04 ± 0.06a | 0.22 ± 0.05a | 0.43 ± 0.07a |
| B | 23.12 ± 0.09a | 24.03 ± 0.08a | 1.39 ± 0.02a | 0.57 ± 0.04a | 1.88 ± 0.09a | 0.18 ± 0.02a | 0.37 ± 0.02a |
| C | 22.96 ± 0.02a | 24.88 ± 0.06a | 1.36 ± 0.09a | 0.48 ± 0.07a | 1.96 ± 0.04a | 0.20 ± 0.04a | 0.31 ± 0.08a |
| D (Control) | 23.26 ± 0.11a | 24.67 ± 0.11a | 1.44 ± 0.02a | 0.62 ± 0.04a | 2.01 ± 0.07a | 0.24 ± 0.05a | 0.42 ± 0.06a |
Values are mean (n = 3) ± SE. The means followed by same letter in the same column are not significantly different according to ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple Comparison tests
Microbiological characteristics of different types of fermented fish flours investigated
| Fermented fish flours | Total bacteria count | Total coliform count | Faecal coliform count | ASR spores count |
|
| Yeast and mold count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2.0 × 101 | <10 | <10 | Absence | <10 | Absence | <10 |
| B | 1.0 × 101 | <10 | <10 | Absence | <10 | Absence | <10 |
| C | 2.0 × 101 | <10 | <10 | Absence | <10 | Absence | <10 |
| D (Control) | 8.0 × 104 | 2.0 × 102 | 1.4 × 102 | 2.0 × 101 | 4.0 × 102 | Absence | 3.0 × 102 |
Fig. 1Process diagram of different fermented fish flours production