Literature DB >> 28540585

Antibiofilm activity and mode of action of DMSO alone and its combination with afatinib against Gram-negative pathogens.

Mohd Fakharul Zaman Raja Yahya1,2, Zazali Alias3, Saiful Anuar Karsani4.   

Abstract

Biofilms are complex microbial communities that tend to attach to either biotic or abiotic surface. Enclosed in a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix, the biofilms often cause persistent infections. The objective of this study was to investigate the antibiofilm activity of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and afatinib against Gram-negative pathogens. Test microorganisms used in this study were Escherichia coli ATCC 1299, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 10145, and Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028. Biofilms were developed in 96-well microplate at 37°C for 24 h. Following removal of non-adherent cells, analysis of biofilm viability, biofilm biomass, and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) matrix were performed using resazurin assay, crystal violet assay, and attenuated total reflectance fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, respectively. Bradford protein assay was conducted to determine the total amount of EPS proteins. The results demonstrated that both 32% DMSO alone and its combination with 3.2 μg/mL afatinib were effective in killing biofilm cells and reducing biofilm biomass. IR spectral variations of EPS matrix of biofilms in the range between 1700 and 900 cm-1 were also observed. Reduction in EPS proteins verified the chemical modifications of EPS matrix. In conclusion, 32% DMSO alone and its combination with 3.2 μg/mL afatinib showed remarkable antibiofilm activities against Gram-negative pathogens. It was suggested that the biofilm inhibition was mediated by the chemical modification of EPS matrix.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Afatinib; Antibiofilm; Dimethyl sulfoxide; Gram-negative pathogen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28540585     DOI: 10.1007/s12223-017-0532-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)        ISSN: 0015-5632            Impact factor:   2.099


  29 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Biofilms: the matrix revisited.

Authors:  Steven S Branda; Shild Vik; Lisa Friedman; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.079

3.  Differential antibacterial activity of genistein arising from global inhibition of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis in some bacterial strains.

Authors:  Katarzyna Ulanowska; Aleksandra Tkaczyk; Grazyna Konopa; Grzegorz Wegrzyn
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Combining biofilm matrix measurements with biomass and viability assays in susceptibility assessments of antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Malena Elise Skogman; Pia Maarit Vuorela; Adyary Fallarero
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  In vitro antimicrobial activity of dimethylsulfoxide.

Authors:  H Basch; H H Gadebusch
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-12

6.  Acute toxicity of various solvents in the mouse and rat. LD50 of ethanol, diethylacetamide, dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, glycerine, N-methylpyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol 400, 1,2-propanediol and Tween 20.

Authors:  W Bartsch; G Sponer; K Dietmann; G Fuchs
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1976

7.  Investigation of ciprofloxacin penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  P A Suci; M W Mittelman; F P Yu; G G Geesey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Dynamics and control of biofilms of the oligotrophic bacterium Caulobacter crescentus.

Authors:  Plamena Entcheva-Dimitrov; Alfred M Spormann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Copper and quaternary ammonium cations exert synergistic bactericidal and antibiofilm activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Joe J Harrison; Raymond J Turner; Daniel A Joo; Michelle A Stan; Catherine S Chan; Nick D Allan; Helen A Vrionis; Merle E Olson; Howard Ceri
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  The genomics and proteomics of biofilm formation.

Authors:  Karin Sauer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  3 in total

1.  Niclosamide Blocks Rice Leaf Blight by Inhibiting Biofilm Formation of Xanthomonas oryzae.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Sahu; Ping Zheng; Nan Yao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Depth distributions of bacteria for the Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected burn wounds treated by methylene blue-mediated photodynamic therapy in rats: effects of additives to photosensitizer.

Authors:  Roma R Sarker; Yasuyuki Tsunoi; Yasue Haruyama; Shunichi Sato; Izumi Nishidate
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.758

3.  Out of control: The need for standardised solvent approaches and data reporting in antibiofilm assays incorporating dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO).

Authors:  Kate Summer; Jessica Browne; Matthijs Hollanders; Kirsten Benkendorff
Journal:  Biofilm       Date:  2022-08-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.