Luk Bruyneel1,2, Ellen Coeckelberghs3, Gunnar Buyse4,5, Kristina Casteels4,5, Barbara Lommers6, Jo Vandersmissen6, Johan Van Eldere6,7, Chris Van Geet4,8, Kris Vanhaecht3,6. 1. Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. luk.bruyneel@med.kuleuven.be. 2. Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. luk.bruyneel@med.kuleuven.be. 3. Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. 4. Department of Child Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. 5. Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. 6. Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. 7. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. 8. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
The recently developed Child HCAHPS provides a standard to measure US hospitals' performance on pediatric inpatient experiences of care. We field-tested Child HCAHPS in Belgium to instigate international comparison. In the development stage, forward/backward translation was conducted and patients assessed content validity index as excellent. The draft Flemish Child HCAHPS included 63 items: 38 items for five topics hypothesized to be similar to those proposed in the US (communication with parent, communication with child, attention to safety and comfort, hospital environment, and global rating), 10 screeners, a 14-item demographic and descriptive section, and one open-ended item. A 6-week pilot test was subsequently performed in three pediatric wards (general ward, hematology and oncology ward, infant and toddler ward) at a JCI-accredited university hospital. An overall response rate of 90.99% (303/333) was achieved and was consistent across wards. Confirmatory factor analysis largely confirmed the configuration of the proposed composites. Composite and single-item measures related well to patients' global rating of the hospital. Interpretation of different patient experiences across types of wards merits further investigation. CONCLUSION: Child HCAHPS provides an opportunity for systematic and cross-national assessment of pediatric inpatient experiences. Sharing and implementing international best practices are the next logical step. What is Known: • Patient experience surveys are increasingly used to reflect on the quality, safety, and centeredness of patient care. • While adult inpatient experience surveys are routinely used across countries around the world, the measurement of pediatric inpatient experiences is a young field of research that is essential to reflect on family-centered care. What is New: • We demonstrate that the US-developed Child HCAHPS provides an opportunity for international benchmarking of pediatric inpatient experiences with care through parents and guardians. • Our study findings show considerable variation in experiences for types of pediatric services. Support to share good practices and launch quality improvement initiatives can be obtained by organizing regular two-way feedback sessions with clinicians to place the findings in context.
The recently developed Child HCAHPS provides a standard to measure US hospitals' performance on pediatric inpatient experiences of care. We field-tested Child HCAHPS in Belgium to instigate international comparison. In the development stage, forward/backward translation was conducted and patients assessed content validity index as excellent. The draft Flemish Child HCAHPS included 63 items: 38 items for five topics hypothesized to be similar to those proposed in the US (communication with parent, communication with child, attention to safety and comfort, hospital environment, and global rating), 10 screeners, a 14-item demographic and descriptive section, and one open-ended item. A 6-week pilot test was subsequently performed in three pediatric wards (general ward, hematology and oncology ward, infant and toddler ward) at a JCI-accredited university hospital. An overall response rate of 90.99% (303/333) was achieved and was consistent across wards. Confirmatory factor analysis largely confirmed the configuration of the proposed composites. Composite and single-item measures related well to patients' global rating of the hospital. Interpretation of different patient experiences across types of wards merits further investigation. CONCLUSION:Child HCAHPS provides an opportunity for systematic and cross-national assessment of pediatric inpatient experiences. Sharing and implementing international best practices are the next logical step. What is Known: • Patient experience surveys are increasingly used to reflect on the quality, safety, and centeredness of patient care. • While adult inpatient experience surveys are routinely used across countries around the world, the measurement of pediatric inpatient experiences is a young field of research that is essential to reflect on family-centered care. What is New: • We demonstrate that the US-developed Child HCAHPS provides an opportunity for international benchmarking of pediatric inpatient experiences with care through parents and guardians. • Our study findings show considerable variation in experiences for types of pediatric services. Support to share good practices and launch quality improvement initiatives can be obtained by organizing regular two-way feedback sessions with clinicians to place the findings in context.
Entities:
Keywords:
Child; Healthcare; Inpatients; Patient satisfaction; Quality assurance; Reproducibility of results; Surveys and questionnaires
Authors: Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Allison Squires; Luk Bruyneel; Linda H Aiken; Koen Van den Heede; Tomasz Brzostek; Reinhard Busse; Anneli Ensio; Maria Schubert; Dimitrios Zikos; Walter Sermeus Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Marc N Elliott; Christopher W Cohea; William G Lehrman; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Paul D Cleary; Laura A Giordano; Megan K Beckett; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: A James O'Malley; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; Kimberly A Hepner; San Keller; Paul D Cleary Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Elizabeth Goldstein; William Lehrman; Katrin Hambarsoomians; Megan K Beckett; Laura Giordano Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Robert Weech-Maldonado; Marc N Elliott; Adetokunbo Oluwole; K Cameron Schiller; Ron D Hays Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.983