| Literature DB >> 28540355 |
J S L Oliveira1, S Lange2,3, B Dobner2, G Brezesinski1.
Abstract
The data in this article shows the effect of isopropyl myristate (IPM) on a 2D Stratum Corneum lipid model. In the first part, the analytical characterization of the synthesized deuterated isopropyl myristate is given. Then a BAM image of the pure Stratum Corneum model used is shown and a dataset of surface-pressure - area isotherms considering various ratios of deuterated and non-deuterated IPM and the Stratum Corneum model mixture is provided. Assuming that after the plateau in the isotherm the area per molecule corresponds only to the Stratum Corneum model (squeezing out of IPM), the value of the area will correspond to the percentage of these lipids in the mixture when considering the pure SC model. The comparison of the real and the calculated areas per molecule is also done.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28540355 PMCID: PMC5430136 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.04.055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1HPLC chromatogram of the purified IPMdeut.
Fig. 2HR-MS spectra of the purified IPMdeut. Found: 296.4203 [M+H]+, 592.8384 [2M+H]+; calcd: 296.4201 [M+H]+, 592.8402 [2M+H]+.
Fig. 3ESI-MS spectra of the purified IPMdeut. Found: 318.18 [M+Na]+, 613.16 [2M+Na]+; calcd: 318.41 [M+Na]+, 613.83 [2M+Na]+.
Fig. 413C-NMR-spectrum of the purified IPMdeut.
Fig. 5BAM images from the SC model of CER[AP], SA and CHOL in a molar ratio of [1:1:0.7], respectively, on pH 5.5 subphase at 21 °C and selected surface pressures (indicated).
Fig. 6π- A isotherms of IPM (left) and IPMdeut (right) and its mixtures with the SC model (ternary mixture of D-form of CER[AP], SA and CHOL in a molar ratio of [1:1:0.7]), at 21 °C, on pH 5.5 subphase. The same colour system in the isotherms is used in both graphs: IPM monolayer (black solid line); SC monolayer (black, dashed line); mixtures of SC model with 10 (blue, dashed line), 30 (red, dashed line), 50 (green solid line), 70 (red solid line) and 90 (blue solid line) mol % IPM.
Area per molecule taken from the isotherm of the different systems (indicated) considering the D-SC model.
| πmN/m | A SC | A SC:IPMdeut [90:10] | A SC:IPM [90:10] | A SC:IPMdeut [70:30] | A SC:IPM [70:30] | A SC:IPMdeut [50:50] | A SC:IPM [50:50] | A SC:IPMdeut [30:70] | A SC:IPM [30:70] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | |
| 5 | 37.4 | 34.5 | 34.7 | 34.0 | 35.1 | 39.6 | 39.0 | 48.3 | 51.7 |
| 10 | 36.7 | 33.9 | 34.0 | 30.4 | 31.1 | 31.3 | 31.4 | 34.4 | 36.7 |
| 15 | 36.2 | 33.5 | 33.5 | 28.5 | 29.2 | 27.2 | 27.6 | 28.2 | 29.9 |
| 30 | 35.1 | 32.6 | 32.6 | 25.4 | 25.9 | 17.9 | 18.7 | 11.9 | 12.2 |
| 39 | 34.3 | 31.7 | 24.2 | 16.9 | 11.2 | ||||
| 40 | 34.2 | 31.9 | 24.4 | 17.5 | 11.2 |
Comparison of the area per molecule taken from the isotherm of the SC and the calculated area corresponding to the percentage of SC present in the mixture (% A SC).
| A SC | A SC:IPMdeut [90:10] | A SC:IPM [90:10] | A SC:IPMdeut [70:30] | A SC:IPM [70:30] | A SC:IPMdeut [50:50] | A SC:IPM [50:50] | A SC:IPMdeut [30:70] | A SC:IPM [30:70] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | |
| 30 mN/m | |||||||||
| A | 35.1 | 32.6 | 32.6 | 25.4 | 25.9 | 17.9 | 18.7 | 11.9 | 12.2 |
| % A SC | 31.6 | 31.6 | 24.6 | 24.6 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 10.5 | 10.5 | |
| Difference between the areas | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.7 | |
| 39 or 40 mN/m | |||||||||
| A | 34.3/ 34.2 | 31.7 | 31.9 | 24.2 | 24.4 | 16.9 | 17.5 | 11.2 | 11.2 |
| % A SC | 30.9 | 30.8 | 24.0 | 23.9 | 17.2 | 17.1 | 10.3 | 10.3 | |
| Difference between the areas | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | -0.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |
Area per molecule taken from the isotherm of the different systems (indicated) considering the SC model with the racemic mixture of CER[AP].
| πmN/m | A SC | A SC:IPMdeut [90:10] | A SC:IPM [90:10] | A SC:IPMdeut [70:30] | A SC:IPM [70:30] | A SC:IPMdeut [50:50] | A SC:IPM [50:50] | A SC:IPMdeut [30:70] | A SC:IPM [30:70] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | |
| 5 | 31.7 | 29.2 | 30.8 | 32.6 | 31.0 | 37.2 | 39.3 | 38.9 | 40.1 |
| 10 | 31.1 | 28.3 | 30.0 | 28.9 | 26.4 | 28.7 | 29.9 | 27.2 | 28.6 |
| 15 | 30.7 | 27.7 | 29.5 | 27.7 | 24.1 | 24.8 | 25.3 | 21.9 | 23.3 |
| 35 | 30.0 | 26.5 | 28.6 | 23.6 | 19.8 | 16.0 | 14.4 | 8.5 | 7.7 |
Comparison of the area per molecule taken from the isotherm of the SC and the calculated area corresponding to the percentage of SC present in the mixture (% A SC).
| 35 mN/m | A SC | A SC:IPMdeut [90:10] | A SC:IPM [90:10] | A SC:IPMdeut [70:30] | A SC:IPM [70:30] | A SC:IPMdeut [50:50] | A SC:IPM [50:50] | A SC:IPMdeut [30:70] | A SC:IPM [30:70] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | Å2 | |
| A | 30.0 | 26.5 | 28.6 | 23.6 | 19.8 | 16.0 | 14.4 | 8.5 | 7.7 |
| % A SC | 27.0 | 27.0 | 21.0 | 21.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | |
| Difference between the areas | −0.5 | 1.6 | 2.6 | −1.2 | 1.0 | −0.6 | −0.5 | −1.3 |
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |