Literature DB >> 28540352

Dataset on Galanin Receptor 3 mutants that improve recombinant receptor expression and stability in an agonist and antagonist bound form.

Thao T Ho1, Jasmine T Nguyen1, Juping Liu2, Pawel Stanczak1, Aaron A Thompson1, Yingzhuo G Yan3, Jasmine Chen3, Charles K Allerston1, Charles L Dillard1, Hao Xu1, Nicholas J Shoger1, Jill S Cameron3, Mark E Massari3, Kathleen Aertgeerts1.   

Abstract

Galanin Receptor 3 (GALR3) is a G-protein-coupled receptor with a widespread distribution in the brain and plays a role in a variety of physiologic processes including cognition/memory, sensory/pain processing, hormone secretion, and feeding behavior. Therefore, GALR3 is considered an attractive CNS drug target (Freimann et al., 2015) [1]. This dataset contains GALR3 point mutants that improve recombinant protein expression and thermal stability of the receptor contained in virus-like particles (VLPs) or obtained by detergent-purification of baculovirus-infected insect cells. The mutations listed can be grouped in those that improve the stability of the agonist-bound and the antagonist-bound form of the receptor. Protein characteristics in terms of protein expression and thermal stability were comparable between GPCR-VLP and GPCR overexpressing Sf9 cultures. The further analysis and detailed results of these mutants as well as their impact on biophysical assay development for drug discovery can be found in "Method for Rapid Optimization of Recombinant GPCR Protein Expression and Stability using Virus-Like Particles" (Ho et al., 2017) [2].

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPCR protein stabilization; GPCR recombinant protein expression; Galanin Receptor type 3; Membrane protein; Protein engineering; Virus-like particles

Year:  2017        PMID: 28540352      PMCID: PMC5430141          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.04.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data The GALR3 mutants listed here aid in increasing the recombinant protein expression yield and stabilization of the receptor in either the agonist or antagonist-bound form. Mutational analysis of the GALR3 variants was performed in VLPs. The chemically stabilizing environment of the phospholipid bilayer in a VLP eliminates the need for recombinant overexpression, purification and detergent solubilization during the iterative protein engineering process. GALR3 protein quality from VLPs was comparable to detergent-purified receptors from overexpressing Sf9 cultures.

Data

The dataset of this article provides information on GALR3 mutants that stabilize the receptor in either an agonist-bound or antagonist-bound form. Table 1 shows how 23 of the 210 point mutants expressed on VLPs increase [125I]-galanin binding and thermal stability compared to WT. In addition, a direct correlation of the Bmax values with recombinant expression yields of the mutants in Sf9 cultures was shown (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Combinations of these mutants were made to find the best thermostabilizing GALR3 agonist-bound (Table 2) and GALR3 antagonist-bound (Table 3) variants.
Table 1

Comparison of GALR3-VLP samples to protein samples expressed in Sf9 insect cells.

GALR3 mutantBmax(mutant)/Bmax(WT) VLP samplesTm(mutant)-Tm (WT) VLP samplesDensity (mutant)/Density (WT) Sf9 cell lysate
WT1.001.0
A115L7.02.96.7
S110A5.35.66.4
A141L3.83.34.4
R125A3.23.73.1
L100A3.13.74.3
L208A3.03.53.7
L211A2.93.33.6
S117A2.83.33.7
C272A2.33.83.6
P21A2.02.5N/A
A19L1.82.22.4
A97L1.83.73.1
A236L1.71.5N/A
R120A1.73.32.7
C70A1.72.03.2
R235A1.63.4N/A
W50A1.54.02.0
A268L1.52.02.4
G144A1.51.71.8
A49L1.24.41.1
L93A1.14.71.4
V116A1.16.10.8
A198L1.02.3N/A

Summary of 23 (out of a total of 210) GALR3 mutants that exhibited a Bmax (mutant)/Bmax (WT) value of ≥1.0 with their concomitant thermal stability relative to WT. Both values were obtained from a [125I]-porcine galanin radiometric competition binding assay using VLP-GALR3 samples. VLP samples were prepared in a small scale, only sufficient for one thermal stability experiment, performed in duplicate. Protein expression yield improvement relative to WT was obtained consequently of the same mutants when recombinantly expressed using baculovirus-infected Sf9 insect cells. These values are presented in the table as relative band intensities measured from a Western blot analysis utilizing an anti-6xHis epitope antibody directed against the GALR3 C-terminal 6xHis-tag. Small-scale expression samples were used and only sufficient for one Western-blot analysis. The intensity of the protein bands corresponding to the GPCR of interest was measured by the software ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov).N/A means not available.

Fig. 1

Western blot analysis of GALR3 WT and point mutants. The point mutants were selected out of 210 GALR3 mutants generated using the VLP platform and based on a Bmax (mutant)/Bmax (WT) value of ≥1.0 measured using a [125I]-porcine galanin radiometric competition binding assay. The 19 mutants were then expressed in insect cells and lysates were run on an SDS-PAGE. The protein of interest was visualized by Western blot utilizing an anti-6xHis epitope antibody directed against the GALR3 C-terminal 6xHis-tag.

Table 2

Protein characteristics of GALR3 agonist-bound mutant combinations.

GALR3 mutantTotal protein yield (µg/L Sf9 culture)SEC peak ratio (%monodisperse/aggregated)Tm (°C)+galanin
WT (reference)371048*
S110A+V116A919056
A115L+A198L+C272A1208356
S110A+A115L+L208A967655
S110A+A115L+R120A485050
S110A+A115L+L211A796255
S110A+A115L+A198L536253
S110A+A115L+A236L385056
S110A+V116A+A236L1209362
S110A+V116A+R125A1609061
S110A+V116A+L100A2448658
S110A+V116A+S117A2018761
S110A+V116A+L211A1528160
S110A+V116A+C272A1887659
S110A+V116A+L208A2289359
S110A+V116A+A141L959559
S110A+R120A+A141L+A236L1967453
S110A+V116A+L208A+A236L1838662
S110A+R120A+L208A+A236L499255
S110A+R120A+A141L+L208A+A236L1699657
S110A+A115L+R120A+A141L+L208A+A236L976054

Mutants are shown for which ≥50% monodispersity could be achieved after mid-scale (300 ml) recombinant expression in insect cells followed by detergent solubilization and purification. Expression was done once and provided enough material for one Tm measurement. Receptor purity and monodispersity was analyzed using SDS-PAGE and analytical size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Thermal stability was measured by the thiol-specific fluorochrome N-[4-(7-diethylamino-4-methyl-3-coumarinyl)phenyl]maleimide (CPM) assay [3] *Note that WT GALR3 protein was mostly aggregated and its Tm value cannot be accurately measured. However, GALR3WT was added to the table as a reference.

Table 3

Protein characteristics of GALR3 antagonist-bound mutant combinations.

GALR3 mutantTotal protein yield (µg/L Sf9 culture)%Mono-dispersityTm (°C) (+DNS001131702)
WT (reference)445436
R120A+A223L628958
798742 (+DNS001355175)
V116A+R120A1067851
V116+A223L826855
V116A+R120A+A223L729058
729042 (+DNS001355175)

Mutants are shown for which ≥50% monodispersity could be achieved after mid-scale (300 ml) recombinant expression in insect cells followed by detergent solubilization and purification in the presence of antagonist DNS001131702 or DNS001355175. Expression was done once and provided enough material for one Tm measurement. Thermal stability was measured by the CPM assay [3].

Western blot analysis of GALR3 WT and point mutants. The point mutants were selected out of 210 GALR3 mutants generated using the VLP platform and based on a Bmax (mutant)/Bmax (WT) value of ≥1.0 measured using a [125I]-porcine galanin radiometric competition binding assay. The 19 mutants were then expressed in insect cells and lysates were run on an SDS-PAGE. The protein of interest was visualized by Western blot utilizing an anti-6xHis epitope antibody directed against the GALR3 C-terminal 6xHis-tag. Comparison of GALR3-VLP samples to protein samples expressed in Sf9 insect cells. Summary of 23 (out of a total of 210) GALR3 mutants that exhibited a Bmax (mutant)/Bmax (WT) value of ≥1.0 with their concomitant thermal stability relative to WT. Both values were obtained from a [125I]-porcine galanin radiometric competition binding assay using VLP-GALR3 samples. VLP samples were prepared in a small scale, only sufficient for one thermal stability experiment, performed in duplicate. Protein expression yield improvement relative to WT was obtained consequently of the same mutants when recombinantly expressed using baculovirus-infected Sf9 insect cells. These values are presented in the table as relative band intensities measured from a Western blot analysis utilizing an anti-6xHis epitope antibody directed against the GALR3 C-terminal 6xHis-tag. Small-scale expression samples were used and only sufficient for one Western-blot analysis. The intensity of the protein bands corresponding to the GPCR of interest was measured by the software ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov).N/A means not available. Protein characteristics of GALR3 agonist-bound mutant combinations. Mutants are shown for which ≥50% monodispersity could be achieved after mid-scale (300 ml) recombinant expression in insect cells followed by detergent solubilization and purification. Expression was done once and provided enough material for one Tm measurement. Receptor purity and monodispersity was analyzed using SDS-PAGE and analytical size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Thermal stability was measured by the thiol-specific fluorochrome N-[4-(7-diethylamino-4-methyl-3-coumarinyl)phenyl]maleimide (CPM) assay [3] *Note that WT GALR3 protein was mostly aggregated and its Tm value cannot be accurately measured. However, GALR3WT was added to the table as a reference. Protein characteristics of GALR3 antagonist-bound mutant combinations. Mutants are shown for which ≥50% monodispersity could be achieved after mid-scale (300 ml) recombinant expression in insect cells followed by detergent solubilization and purification in the presence of antagonist DNS001131702 or DNS001355175. Expression was done once and provided enough material for one Tm measurement. Thermal stability was measured by the CPM assay [3].

Experimental design, materials and methods

Characteristics of GALR3 point mutants in VLP versus detergent purified receptors from overexpressing Sf9 cultures

Initial rank ordering of 210 GALR3-VLP point mutants, mostly located in GALR3 transmembrane helices, was based on expression yield obtained from a radiometric assay measuring the binding of [125I]-galanin to the receptor and comparing Bmax values of the mutants relative to the Bmax value of WT GALR3. 23 of the 210 mutants showed Bmax (mutant)/Bmax (WT) values of ≥1.0 and an increase in thermal stability relative to WT GALR3 (Table 1). 19 GALR3 point mutants were then recombinantly expressed in Sf9 insect cells to measure protein expression yields as determined by SDS-PAGE/Western blot band intensities (Fig. 1). Expression levels of the 19 single mutants followed the same rank-order as the Bmax values measured by the radiometric assay on the corresponding VLP samples (Fig. 1 and Table 1).

GALR3 agonist-bound thermostabilizing variants

The best GALR3 single point mutants were combined for mid-scale (300 ml) recombinant expression in Sf9 insect cells and protein parameters such as expression yield, monodispersity and thermal stability in the presence of galanin are listed in Table 2, summarizing the best mutant combinations that improved the agonist-bound protein characteristics of the receptor.

GALR3 antagonist-bound thermostabilizing variants

In order to find the stabilizing GALR3 antagonist-bound mutants, we used the data from the GALR3-VLP [125I]-galanin binding assay described above to select 88 single point mutants with Bmax values ≥80% of WT, assuming that these displayed enough receptor density to be further evaluated in a size-exclusion chromatography/liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (SEC/LC-MS) based binding assay. Prior to SEC/LC-MS, the GALR3-VLP samples were incubated with GALR3 antagonist, DNS000135175 (Ki=55 nM) or DNS001131702 (Ki=127 nM) and subjected to a temperature gradient ranging from 15 °C to 55 °C. Before the acquisition of the LC-MS spectra of the ligand, unbound ligand was removed by SEC. A total of 5 single point mutants were found to stabilize the antagonist form of GALR3 by ≥4 °C when compared to the WT form, and rank-ordered from most to least stabilizing as: A223L (ΔT=8.3 °C), A218L (ΔT=7.2 °C), R120A (ΔT=5.4 °C), V116A (ΔT=4.6 °C), E224A (ΔT=4.2 °C). Similar to the GALR3 agonist-bound studies, the best GALR3 single point mutants were combined for recombinant expression in Sf9 insect cells and protein parameters such as expression yield, monodispersity and thermal stability in the presence of a GALR3 antagonist-bound form are listed in Table 3.
Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaGPCR Protein Engineering and Stabilization
Type of dataTable, figure
How data was acquiredWestern Blot, Radioligand binding assay, HPLC, thiol-specific fluorochrome N-[4-(7-diethylamino-4-methyl-3-coumarinyl)phenyl]maleimide (CPM) assay [3], Electrospray ionization (ESI)-Mass Spectrometry (MS), hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Q-ToF Ultima, Waters, Manchester, UK)
Data formatFiltered and analyzed
Experimental factorsDoes not apply
Experimental featuresGALR3 mutants were produced and screened in virus-like particles using label and label-free assay formats; recombinant receptor protein expression and stability was obtained in virus-like particles and after detergent-solubilization from recombinant Sf9 expressions.
Data source locationDoes not apply
Data accessibilityThe data are included in this article
  3 in total

1.  Method for rapid optimization of recombinant GPCR protein expression and stability using virus-like particles.

Authors:  Thao T Ho; Jasmine T Nguyen; Juping Liu; Pawel Stanczak; Aaron A Thompson; Yingzhuo G Yan; Jasmine Chen; Charles K Allerston; Charles L Dillard; Hao Xu; Nicholas J Shoger; Jill S Cameron; Mark E Massari; Kathleen Aertgeerts
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 2.  Galanin receptors as a potential target for neurological disease.

Authors:  Krista Freimann; Kaido Kurrikoff; Ülo Langel
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 6.902

3.  Microscale fluorescent thermal stability assay for membrane proteins.

Authors:  Alexander I Alexandrov; Mauro Mileni; Ellen Y T Chien; Michael A Hanson; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.006

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.