| Literature DB >> 28540299 |
H C Cheng1,2, M S Chen2,3, B Y Peng1,2, W T Lin1, Y K Shen4, Y H Wang5.
Abstract
The conventional orthodontic power chain, often composed of polymer materials, has drawbacks such as a reduction of elasticity owing to water absorption as well as surface discoloration and staining resulting from food or beverages consumed by the patient. The goal of this study was to develop a surface treatment (nanoimprinting) for orthodontic power chains and to alleviate their shortcomings. A concave template (anodic alumina) was manufactured by anodization process using pure aluminum substrate by employing the nanoimprinting process. Convex nanopillars were fabricated on the surface of orthodontic power chains, resulting in surface treatment. Distinct parameters of the nanoimprinting process (e.g., imprinting temperature, imprinting pressure, imprinting time, and demolding temperature) were used to fabricate nanopillars on the surface of orthodontic power chains. The results of this study showed that the contact angle of the power chains became larger after surface treatment. In addition, the power chains changed from hydrophilic to hydrophobic. The power chain before surface treatment without water absorption had a water absorption rate of approximately 4%, whereas a modified chain had a water absorption rate of approximately 2%-4%. Furthermore, the color adhesion of the orthodontic power chains after surface modification was less than that before surface modification.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28540299 PMCID: PMC5429950 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6343724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Complete process for AAO template fabrication and nanoimprinting.
Figure 2Orthodontic power chains. (a) 3M Alastik chain, (b) Dyna-link chain.
Figure 3Glass transition temperatures of different power chains. (a) 3M Alastik chain, (b) Dyna-link chain.
Levels of processing parameters for nanoimprinting.
| Parameter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition | Imprinting temp. (°C) | Demolding | Imprinting | Imprinting |
| A | 155 | 50 | 180 | 50 |
| B | 160 | 50 | 180 | 50 |
| C | 165 | 50 | 180 | 50 |
| D | 170 | 50 | 180 | 50 |
Figure 4SEM images and surface roughness of the AAO (Φ = 100 nm, Ra = 10.83 nm).
Figure 5SEM images of different molded orthodontic power chains before nanoimprinting. (a) 3M Alastik chain, (b) Dyna-link chain.
Figure 6SEM images of nanopillars of different molded orthodontic power chains for nanoimprinting using the AAO template. (a) Nanoimprinting with processing condition A. (b) Nanoimprinting with processing condition B. (c) Nanoimprinting with processing condition C. (d) Nanoimprinting with processing condition D.
Figure 7Contact angles of orthodontic power chains before and after surface treatment (values are the mean ± SD of six experiments (n = 6), p < 0.05, p < 0.01).
Absorption rates of orthodontic power chains before and after surface treatment (3M Alastik/Dyna-link).
| Weight before absorbing water (g) | Weight after absorbing water (g) | Weight difference (g) | Water absorption rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No surface modification | 0.005/0.004 | 0.0052/0.0042 | 0.0002/0.0002 | 4%/5% |
| A | 0.0054/0.004 | 0.0056/0.0042 | 0.0002/0.0002 | 3.7%/5% |
| B | 0.0051/0.0034 | 0.0052/0.0036 | 0.0001/0.0002 | 2%/4.4% |
| C | 0.0047/0.0047 | 0.0049/0.0048 | 0.0002/0.0001 | 4.2%/2.1% |
| D | 0.0049/0.0044 | 0.0051/0.0048 | 0.0002/0.0004 | 4%/5.5% |
Figure 8Dyeing test for orthodontic power chain (3M Alastik chain).