Literature DB >> 28540248

Long non-coding RNAs: new frontiers for advancing personalized cancer medicine in prostate cancer.

Alireza Fotouhi Ghiam1,2, Danny Vesprini1,2, Stanley K Liu1,2,3.   

Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a group of non-coding transcripts of more than 200 nucleotides that play important biological and clinical roles in prostate cancer (PCa) tumorigenesis, progression and metastasis. They have also shown potential as a biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of this disease. LncRNA prostate cancer associated transcript-14 (PCAT-14) was recently identified as a novel prognostic biomarker in PCa, whose low expression was associated with poor outcomes. Here, we briefly discuss future perspectives and clinical applications of lncRNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for PCa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA); biomarker; prostate cancer (PCa); radiotherapy (RT)

Year:  2017        PMID: 28540248      PMCID: PMC5422697          DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


The significance of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in prostate cancer (PCa) is rapidly gaining attention because of accumulating evidence that demonstrates their important biological roles in tumor development and progression, and their biomarker potential in the diagnosis and prognosis of this disease (1). The advances in next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics analysis have led to the discovery of numerous lncRNAs which have dysregulated expression in PCa (1,2). Some of these lncRNAs have been found to exhibit oncogenic function or act as tumor suppressors, while the functions of several others remain unknown. We read with interest the recent study by White et al. (3). They performed an integrative analysis and found androgen-regulated prostate cancer associated transcript-14 (PCAT-14) as the most prevalent lncRNA that was overexpressed in prostate tumors relative to normal prostate. Lower PCAT-14 expression was associated with increasing Gleason score and poor outcome; i.e., higher probability of metastatic progression, PCa-specific mortality and lower overall survival in multiple independent cohorts and ethnicities. In contrast, in vitro experiments demonstrated that high PCAT-14 expression suppressed an aggressive phenotype via reduced cellular growth, migration, and invasion. Additionally, PCAT-14 expression was reduced in patients with metastatic PCa. PCAT-14 is a PCa- and lineage-specific lncRNA. It was previously identified as a marker of low grade and indolent disease by Shukla et al. (4), as their data suggested that PCAT-14 can be used as a diagnostic biomarker, and overexpression of PCAT-14 suppressed invasion in vitro. These findings were similar to the White et al. (3) study, which found that PCAT14 was highly upregulated in PCa and loss of PCAT-14 was predictive of aggressive disease and prognostic for poor outcome. Taken together, and now validated in separate independent cohorts, the results of these two studies confirm that PCAT-14 represents a unique biomarker that can be used for PCa diagnosis (highly expressed in prostate tumors) and can act as both a prognostic (lower expression associated with poor outcome) and predictive biomarker (response to androgen deprivation therapy). LncRNAs act broadly within gene networks to regulate the major pathways of cell growth, proliferation, migration, invasion, differentiation and survival (5). Recent studies have indicated that lncRNAs can mediate a “sponge” regulatory network (sequestering microRNAs) that can differentially affect the expression of many protein-coding PCa driver genes and key components of cancer-driving pathways during carcinogenesis (6). Moreover, some lncRNAs are linked to reactivation of the androgen receptor signaling axis and reprogramming of PCa cellular metabolism, and thus may be differentially expressed during various phases of tumor development and progression (2,7,8). This might explain why PCAT-14 expression initially increases during prostate tumorigenesis and then subsequently decreases in the metastatic setting. Several PCa-specific or PCa-associated lncRNAs have been identified to date, but only a few have been validated in independent patient cohorts or approved for clinical practice. Prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) is the most prominent and clinically-relevant PCa-associated lncRNA, which was initially described as a novel biomarker of PCa and subsequently developed as a promising urine test for this disease. The PCA3 lncRNA-based urine test is approved for the diagnosis of PCa and notably has shown better performance than prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in urinary detection of PCa (9). The major barriers to more widespread use of PCA3 are its inability to be used as a prognostic biomarker and contradictory studies on its value in the prediction of clinical-pathological features of PCa (10,11). The main clinically-relevant lncRNAs in PCa are summarized in .
Table 1

The list of clinically-relevant lncRNAs in PCa

lncRNAFull nameClinical significanceReference
HCG11HLA complex group 11Downregulated in PCa(12)
Low expression associated with higher BCR and poor survival
PCAT-14Prostate cancer associated transcript-14Low expression associated with poor outcome(3)
PCA3Prostate cancer antigen 3First lncRNA identified in PCa(9,13)
Overexpressed in PCa
Highly prostate-specific
Modulates AR signaling
Urine assay for PCa early detection (FDA-approved Progensa PCA3 assay to aid in the decision of repeat biopsy)
Prognostic biomarker in combination with TMPRSS2-ERG
Oncogenic lncRNA
PCGEM1Prostate cancer gene expression marker 1Overexpressed in PCa(14,15)
Associated with high-risk PCa
Overexpressed in therapy resistant PCa
Correlated with AR signaling
Highly prostate-specific
Oncogenic lncRNA
SCHLAP1Second chromosome locus associated with prostate-1Associated with aggressive PCa(16-18)
Overexpressed in advanced PCa
High expression associated with BCR, clinical progression, metastasis and PCSM
High expression significantly prognostic for metastatic progression
MALAT1Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript-1Overexpressed in PCa(19,20)
Diagnostic urinary biomarker for predicting PCa risk
High expression associated with indicators of poor prognosis (high Gleason score, TNM stage and high PSA)
Higher expression in castrate resistant PCa
UCA1Urothelial carcinoma associated 1Modulates RT response in PCa cell lines(21)
High expression associated with poor outcome
NEAT1Nuclear enriched abundant transcript 1Overexpressed in PCa(22)
High expression associated with PCa progression, aggressive disease and poor outcome

lncRNAs, long non-coding RNAs; PCa, prostate cancer; BCR, biochemical recurrence; AR, androgen receptor; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; PCSM, PCa-specific mortality; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; RT, radiotherapy.

lncRNAs, long non-coding RNAs; PCa, prostate cancer; BCR, biochemical recurrence; AR, androgen receptor; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; PCSM, PCa-specific mortality; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; RT, radiotherapy. There is an urgent unmet need to develop sensitive and specific biomarkers for individualizing treatment recommendation in PCa. The promise of biomarkers to guide therapy is anticipated to extend to the radiotherapy (RT) setting. Recently, a systems biology-based radiosensitivity model [radiosensitivity index (RSI)] and a genomic-based clinical model [genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD)] have been developed which could help to predict intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity and personalize RT dose so that patients receive the optimum dose with an improved therapeutic ratio (23-25). Determining which patients harbor RT-resistant disease and are unlikely to derive a therapeutic benefit from RT will prevent overtreatment, thus removing the burden of unnecessary therapy and side-effects from patients and reduce costs to healthcare systems. Rather, these patients may benefit from radical prostatectomy or early integration of systemic therapies. To optimally integrate lncRNA-based biomarkers into the management of PCa patients being considered for RT, we need to identify the biomarkers that specifically predict RT response rather than those that are prognostic of outcome independent of treatment (26). For instance, we have recently discovered that the lncRNA urothelial carcinoma associated 1 (UCA1) mediates radiosensitivity in PCa cell lines and thus may be a promising biomarker to predict RT response in patients with PCa. UCA1 modulates radiosensitivity of PCa cells by impairing cell cycle progression, potentially through downregulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway (21). Incorporating lncRNA biomarkers into standard risk stratification and as adjuncts to biomarkers that already exist could improve their specificity and sensitivity, help to precisely select aggressive from indolent cancer and optimize patient selection for definitive therapy. Combining these biomarkers with historical prognostic factors (PSA, Gleason score, clinical-pathological stage) would help to better predict treatment response and guide therapy decisions. The combination of different biomarkers together or with PSA (urinary TMPRSS2:ERG with urinary PCA3 and serum PSA) has been reported to provide high specificity and sensitivity compared to a single marker and increase the accuracy of prognostication (27). The detection of these lncRNAs is feasible in bodily fluids and may therefore be used as a liquid biopsy (9,19). Blood and urine-based biomarkers are ideal because they are minimally invasive and convenient for patients, can be readily monitored over the course of the disease and treatment, and are more representative of a patient’s entire PCa genome (compared to targeted biopsies). The identified biomarkers or combinations of markers require confirmation in large cohorts of patients to validate their specificity and sensitivity. These non-invasive lncRNAs could then be used to build biomarker signatures that serve to triage patients with aggressive disease for alternate or more intensive therapies and to identify a subset of patients for future biomarker-driven clinical trials. These strategies could potentially increase response rates as patients are triaged to the most appropriate treatment regimen and those patients who are unlikely to benefit are spared unnecessary side-effects of therapy. LncRNAs also offer the potential to be a novel class of cancer therapeutic targets in the future. The strategies could be either to suppress oncogenic function or to activate tumor-suppressive activity of prostate-specific lncRNAs. To achieve this, further investigations are required to understand the functional role and molecular mechanisms of lncRNAs involved in PCa oncogenesis or tumor suppression, and characterize the critical mediators for selective cell killing.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Role of lncRNAs in prostate cancer development and progression.

Authors:  Melanie Weiss; Christoph Plass; Clarissa Gerhauser
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.915

Review 2.  Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions.

Authors:  R J Hendriks; I M van Oort; J A Schalken
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  PCGEM1, a prostate-specific gene, is overexpressed in prostate cancer.

Authors:  V Srikantan; Z Zou; G Petrovics; L Xu; M Augustus; L Davis; J R Livezey; T Connell; I A Sesterhenn; K Yoshino; G S Buzard; F K Mostofi; D G McLeod; J W Moul; S Srivastava
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A genome-based model for adjusting radiotherapy dose (GARD): a retrospective, cohort-based study.

Authors:  Jacob G Scott; Anders Berglund; Michael J Schell; Ivaylo Mihaylov; William J Fulp; Binglin Yue; Eric Welsh; Jimmy J Caudell; Kamran Ahmed; Tobin S Strom; Eric Mellon; Puja Venkat; Peter Johnstone; John Foekens; Jae Lee; Eduardo Moros; William S Dalton; Steven A Eschrich; Howard McLeod; Louis B Harrison; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Modulation of long noncoding RNAs by risk SNPs underlying genetic predispositions to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Haiyang Guo; Musaddeque Ahmed; Fan Zhang; Cindy Q Yao; SiDe Li; Yi Liang; Junjie Hua; Fraser Soares; Yifei Sun; Jens Langstein; Yuchen Li; Christine Poon; Swneke D Bailey; Kinjal Desai; Teng Fei; Qiyuan Li; Dorota H Sendorek; Michael Fraser; John R Prensner; Trevor J Pugh; Mark Pomerantz; Robert G Bristow; Mathieu Lupien; Felix Y Feng; Paul C Boutros; Matthew L Freedman; Martin J Walsh; Housheng Hansen He
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Multi-institutional Analysis Shows that Low PCAT-14 Expression Associates with Poor Outcomes in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Nicole M White; Shuang G Zhao; Jin Zhang; Emily B Rozycki; Ha X Dang; Sandra D McFadden; Abdallah M Eteleeb; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Ismael A Vergara; Nicholas Erho; Jeffrey M Arbeit; Robert Jeffrey Karnes; Robert B Den; Elai Davicioni; Christopher A Maher
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  The use of PCA3 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daphne Hessels; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Validation of a radiosensitivity molecular signature in breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven A Eschrich; William J Fulp; Yudi Pawitan; John A Foekens; Marcel Smid; John W M Martens; Michelle Echevarria; Vidya Kamath; Ji-Hyun Lee; Eleanor E Harris; Jonas Bergh; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Deciphering the function of non-coding RNAs in prostate cancer.

Authors:  João Ramalho-Carvalho; Bastian Fromm; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.264

10.  The long noncoding RNA SChLAP1 promotes aggressive prostate cancer and antagonizes the SWI/SNF complex.

Authors:  John R Prensner; Matthew K Iyer; Anirban Sahu; Irfan A Asangani; Qi Cao; Lalit Patel; Ismael A Vergara; Elai Davicioni; Nicholas Erho; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Robert B Jenkins; Timothy J Triche; Rohit Malik; Rachel Bedenis; Natalie McGregor; Teng Ma; Wei Chen; Sumin Han; Xiaojun Jing; Xuhong Cao; Xiaoju Wang; Benjamin Chandler; Wei Yan; Javed Siddiqui; Lakshmi P Kunju; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Kenneth J Pienta; Felix Y Feng; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Long non-coding RNA in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christine An; Ian Wang; Xin Li; Rong Xia; Fangming Deng
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 2.  The promising role of new molecular biomarkers in prostate cancer: from coding and non-coding genes to artificial intelligence approaches.

Authors:  Ana Paula Alarcón-Zendejas; Anna Scavuzzo; Miguel A Jiménez-Ríos; Rosa M Álvarez-Gómez; Rogelio Montiel-Manríquez; Clementina Castro-Hernández; Miguel A Jiménez-Dávila; Delia Pérez-Montiel; Rodrigo González-Barrios; Francisco Jiménez-Trejo; Cristian Arriaga-Canon; Luis A Herrera
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs and their role in disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Guoku Hu; Fang Niu; Bree A Humburg; Ke Liao; Sunil Bendi; Shannon Callen; Howard S Fox; Shilpa Buch
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-01

Review 4.  Pathological bases and clinical impact of long noncoding RNAs in prostate cancer: a new budding star.

Authors:  Tao Xu; Chang-Ming Lin; Shu-Qi Cheng; Jie Min; Li Li; Xiao-Ming Meng; Cheng Huang; Lei Zhang; Zi-Yu Deng; Jun Li
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 27.401

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.