Literature DB >> 28540195

Conversion from prolonged intravenous fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone in critically ill children.

Vijay Srinivasan1, Daniel Pung1, Sean P O'Neill1.   

Abstract

AIM: To describe our institutional experience with conversion from intravenous (IV) fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone and occurrence of withdrawal in critically ill mechanically ventilated children exposed to prolonged sedation and analgesia.
METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively studied consecutively admitted invasively mechanically ventilated children (0-18 years) sedated with IV fentanyl infusion > 5 d and subsequently converted directly to enteral methadone. Data were obtained on subject demographics, illness severity, daily IV fentanyl and enteral methadone dosing, time to complete conversion, withdrawal scores (WAT-1), pain scores, and need for rescue opioids. Patients were classified as rapid conversion group (RCG) if completely converted ≤ 48 h and slow conversion group (SCG) if completely converted in > 48 h. Primary outcome was difference in WAT-1 scores at 7 d. Secondary outcomes included differences in overall pain scores, and differences in daily rescue opioids.
RESULTS: Compared to SCG (n = 21), RCG (n = 21) had lower median WAT-1 scores at 7 d (2.5 vs 5, P = 0.027). Additionally, RCG had lower overall median pain scores (3 vs 6, P = 0.007), and required less median daily rescue opioids (3 vs 12, P = 0.003) than SCG. The starting daily median methadone dose was 2.3 times the daily median fentanyl dose in the RCG, compared to 1.1 times in the SCG (P = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: We observed wide variation in conversion from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone and variability in withdrawal in critically ill mechanically ventilated children exposed to prolonged sedation. In those children who converted successfully from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone within a period of 48 h, a methadone:fentanyl dose conversion ratio of approximately 2.5:1 was associated with less withdrawal and reduced need for rescue opioids.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Intensive care; Methadone; Prolonged opioid infusion; Withdrawal

Year:  2017        PMID: 28540195      PMCID: PMC5424279          DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i2.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr        ISSN: 2219-2808


Core tip: Critically ill children exposed to prolonged opioid infusions for sedation and analgesia frequently experience withdrawal symptoms when these infusions are discontinued. Conversion to intermittent opioids such as methadone may reduce such withdrawal symptoms, but published studies and guidelines vary widely in terms of dosing and timeframes for such conversions. In this pragmatic analysis of current practice in our institution, we observed wide variation in dosing conversion and timeframes. We observed that it is feasible to convert from intravenous fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone within a timeframe of 48 h using a methadone:fentanyl dose conversion ratio of approximately 2.5:1 to minimize withdrawal and reduce need for rescue opioids.

INTRODUCTION

Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are often administered opioids in the form of intravenous (IV) infusions to provide consistent sedation and analgesia titrated to effect[1,2]. Tolerance and physical dependence frequently develop with prolonged opioid use resulting in an increased likelihood of developing a withdrawal syndrome when the IV opioid infusion is abruptly discontinued[3]. Withdrawal is frequently associated with neurologic, autonomic and gastrointestinal abnormalities, which can result in considerable morbidity with prolongation of PICU and hospital length of stay[4]. The risk of withdrawal increases depending on the cumulative dose exposure as well as the duration of infusion[3,4]. For example, a cumulative IV fentanyl dose of at least 1.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) or 5 d of IV infusion has been associated with a 50% risk of developing withdrawal symptoms when the IV fentanyl infusion was rapidly weaned over 2 d[4]. This risk increases to 100% when the patient has received a cumulative dose of at least 2.5 mg/kg or 9 d of continuous IV fentanyl infusion[4]. Withdrawal may be avoided or attenuated during recovery either by slowly tapering the IV infusion, or by conveniently substituting the IV opioid infusion with IV or enteral opioids that are then tapered slowly over a period of time. Methadone is a commonly used synthetic opioid for weaning critically ill children off IV opioid infusions due to its long half-life, good oral bioavailability and low cost[5-9]. Methadone is available for administration in both IV and enteral forms. However, concerns with use of methadone include lack of pharmacokinetic data in children, significant interactions with other drugs, and increased risk of electrocardiographic abnormalities such as QTc prolongation[10-12]. Importantly, there is a lack of consensus on an optimal dosing guideline for conversion from IV fentanyl infusions directly to enteral methadone (or via IV methadone as an intermediate step). A variety of studies have documented varying methadone:fentanyl conversion ratios (ranging from 1:1 to 4:1) and time frames (ranging from 24-48 h or longer) during conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone[6-9,13-16]. We undertook this study to describe our institutional experience with conversion from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone and occurrence of withdrawal in critically ill children exposed to prolonged IV fentanyl infusion for sedation and analgesia. A secondary objective of our study was to derive an optimal dose conversion ratio of methadone:fentanyl associated with minimal withdrawal when converting from IV fentanyl infusion completely and directly to enteral methadone within a 48-h timeframe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

With Institutional Review Board approval and waiver of informed consent, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive children admitted to our PICU between November 2004 and February 2008. Patients were included if they were between 0-18 years of age, invasively mechanically ventilated via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy, on IV fentanyl infusion for more than 5 d and started on scheduled enteral methadone with the intention to wean off the IV fentanyl infusion completely. Patients with “Do not attempt resuscitation” status, burns, malignancy, chronic pain syndromes, or prior opioid use for more than 7 d in the 3 mo preceding admission to the PICU were excluded. Children undergoing cardiac surgery and neonates are cared for in other intensive care units separate from the PICU at our institution and were not eligible for this study. The pharmacy computer system database and the hospital electronic health record systems were screened for eligible subjects. Data collected included demographic information on age, weight, gender and diagnoses, severity of illness expressed as pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM III) scores[17], daily IV fentanyl and enteral methadone dosing, duration and adjustments of IV fentanyl infusion, time to conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone, administration of opioid rescues, and use of concomitant sedative and analgesic medications (benzodiazepines, barbiturates, clonidine, acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and neuromuscular blockers). All patients were monitored for opioid withdrawal symptoms using the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 (WAT-1)[18]. The WAT-1 scale ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more withdrawal symptoms. All patients were also monitored for pain during this period using pain scales depending on patient age and verbal/cognitive capacity: We used the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale in nonverbal children 0 to 6 years of age; the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale in nonverbal cognitively impaired children aged 6 years or older; and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale in verbal children aged 3 years or older[19-21]. All pain scales range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more pain. Data on WAT-1 scores were abstracted at 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 h and 7 d from the time of enteral methadone initiation. Data on overall pain scores were abstracted during the 7 d from initial enteral methadone initiation.

Institutional practice during study period

During the study period, critically ill children requiring invasive mechanical ventilation in our PICU were typically provided sedation and analgesia with IV fentanyl infusions in combination with other agents. Patients who were administered IV fentanyl infusions for prolonged periods (typically greater than 5 d) were usually switched to enteral methadone administered every 12 h during recovery to manage dependence and prevent symptoms of withdrawal. The initial dose conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone was determined by the clinical team based on clinical judgment and in discussion with the Clinical Pharmacist. The suggested time frame for conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone was usually 48 h, but was not standardized and left to attending physician discretion. After the second dose of enteral methadone, the IV fentanyl infusion was decreased by 50%. After the third dose of enteral methadone, the IV fentanyl infusion was decreased by a further 50%. After the fourth dose of enteral methadone, the IV fentanyl infusion was typically discontinued. Thereafter, the dosing of enteral methadone was adjusted by the attending physician to prevent both withdrawal symptoms as well as over-sedation.

Definitions and outcomes

Patients were classified into the rapid conversion group (RCG) if they were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone in 48 h or less, or the slow conversion group (SCG) if they were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. The primary outcome measure was difference in WAT-1 scores between the RCG and the SCG at 7 d from the time of enteral methadone initiation. Secondary outcome measures were differences in WAT-1 scores at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h from the time of enteral methadone initiation, as well as overall WAT-1 and overall pain scores during the 7 d from enteral methadone initiation. Additional secondary outcomes included differences in ventilator free days at 28 d (VFD), PICU length of stay (LOS), and use of daily rescue opioids and concomitant medications.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Standard descriptive summaries were reported for baseline demographic data. The data were presented as mean ± SD if normally distributed, or median with inter-quartile range (IQR) if not normally distributed. Differences between the RCG and the SCG were compared using the t-test (in the case of continuous variables that were normally distributed) or the Mann-Whitney U test (in the case of continuous variables that were not normally distributed). Differences in categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Differences at respective paired time points for WAT-1 and pain scores between the RCG and the SCG were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test (as these were rank ordered). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical methods and analysis were completed by Srinivasan V (first author of the study and trained in analytical methods via University of Pennsylvania biostatistics certificate courses).

RESULTS

A total of forty-two children were included in the study: 21 (50%) in the RCG and 21 (50%) in the SCG. The median time to complete conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone in the RCG was 25 h (IQR 19-34 h), while the median time to complete conversion in the SCG was 109 h (IQR 77-240 h, P < 0.05). Both groups were comparable with regard to baseline characteristics, including severity of illness and admitting diagnosis (Table 1). There were no significant differences in initial fentanyl infusion dose, duration of fentanyl infusion, maximum dose of fentanyl infusion or cumulative dose of fentanyl prior to conversion between the two groups. Table 2 compares the two groups during conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone. Compared with the SCG, the RCG required fewer rescue opioids in the first 96 h of transition per patient and fewer increases in the scheduled dose of enteral methadone. There were no significant differences between the use of concomitant sedative and analgesic medications across the groups.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of rapid and slow conversion groups

Rapid conversion groupa (n = 21)Slow conversion groupb (n = 21)P value
Age, yr (median, IQR)1 (0.3-3.5)2 (0.8-4)0.95
Gender, male (%)14 (67%)9 (43%)0.21
Weight, kg (median, IQR)10 (5.5-14.3)9.6 (6.8-15.9)0.88
PRISM III (mean ± SD)11.4 ± 916.1 ± 9.90.13
Admitting diagnosis, n (%)1
ARDS/acute lung injury14 (67)14 (67)
Other (sepsis, seizures)7 (33)7 (33)
Pre-existing tracheostomy, n (%)6 (29)6 (29)1
Duration of IV fentanyl infusion prior to initiation of enteral methadone, d (median, IQR)9 (8-14)10 (8-21)0.48
Maximum dose of IV fentanyl infusion, μg/kg per hour (median, IQR)6 (4-7)6.75 (4-9.25)0.41
Cumulative dose of IV fentanyl infusion at time of initiation of enteral methadone, mg/kg (median, IQR)1.48 (1.11-1.92)1.64 (1.03-1.98)0.49
Concomitant sedative and analgesic infusions0.61
Benzodiazepine, n (%)18 (86)20 (95)
Ketamine, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)
Dexmedetomidine, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)

Rapid conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less;

Slow conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. IQR: Inter-quartile range; SD: Standard deviation; PRISMIII: Pediatric risk of mortality; ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; IV: Intravenous.

Table 2

Conversion from intravenous fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone in rapid and slow conversion groups

Rapid conversion groupa (n = 21)Slow conversion groupb (n = 21)P value
Dose of IV fentanyl infusion at initiation of enteral methadone, μg/kg per hour (median, IQR)4 (3-4)4.5 (3.6-7)0.23
Adjustments in scheduled enteral methadone dose< 0.05
Increase in dose1533
Decrease in dose173
Opioid rescues in first 96 h of transition per patient (median, IQR)3 (1-7)12 (4-17)< 0.05
0-24 h0 (0-2)3 (0-4)< 0.05
24-48 h1 (0-2)2 (1-6)0.02
48-72 h0 (0-1)1 (1-6)0.01
72-96 h0 (0-2)2 (0-4)0.12
Opioid rescues in first 96 h of transition by agent< 0.05
Morphine4451
Fentanyl51210
Concomitant medications administered in first 96 h of transition (number of administrations)0.6
Benzodiazepines3240
Clonidine53
Barbiturates28
NSAIDS22
Neuromuscular blockers46
Acetaminophen910

Rapid conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less;

Slow conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. IV: Intravenous; IQR: Inter-quartile range; NSAIDS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Baseline characteristics of rapid and slow conversion groups Rapid conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less; Slow conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. IQR: Inter-quartile range; SD: Standard deviation; PRISMIII: Pediatric risk of mortality; ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; IV: Intravenous. Conversion from intravenous fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone in rapid and slow conversion groups Rapid conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less; Slow conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. IV: Intravenous; IQR: Inter-quartile range; NSAIDS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The initial daily median enteral methadone dose was 2.3 times the daily median IV fentanyl dose in the RCG, compared to 1.1 times in the SCG (P < 0.05). Both groups had similar daily doses of enteral methadone at initiation (0.064 mg/kg in the RCG vs 0.06 mg/kg in the SCG, P = 0.62) and at 48 h (0.064 mg/kg in the RCG vs 0.076 mg/kg in the SCG, P = 0.9). However, at 7 d, the RCG had a significantly lower daily dose of enteral methadone compared to the SCG (0.03 mg/kg vs 0.189 mg/kg, P = 0.02) (Figure 1A). While the RCG experienced a consistent reduction in the IV fentanyl infusion dropping to zero by 48 h, the SCG experienced an increase in the IV fentanyl infusion over the first 48 h followed by a consistent reduction thereafter (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Comparison of enteral methadone and intravenous fentanyl titration across groups in the study. A: Paired comparison of median enteral methadone doses (mg/kg) between rapid conversion group and slow conversion group at serial time points following initiation of enteral methadone (aP < 0.05); B: Paired comparison of median intravenous fentanyl infusion doses (μg/kg per hour) between rapid conversion group and slow conversion group at serial time points following initiation of enteral methadone (aP < 0.05). RCG: Rapid conversion group consisted of patients who were completely converted from fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less; SCG: Slow conversion group consisted of patients who were completely converted from fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h.

Comparison of enteral methadone and intravenous fentanyl titration across groups in the study. A: Paired comparison of median enteral methadone doses (mg/kg) between rapid conversion group and slow conversion group at serial time points following initiation of enteral methadone (aP < 0.05); B: Paired comparison of median intravenous fentanyl infusion doses (μg/kg per hour) between rapid conversion group and slow conversion group at serial time points following initiation of enteral methadone (aP < 0.05). RCG: Rapid conversion group consisted of patients who were completely converted from fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less; SCG: Slow conversion group consisted of patients who were completely converted from fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. For the primary outcome measure of withdrawal at 7 d, the RCG had lower median WAT-1 scores at 7 d (2.5 vs 5, P = 0.03) (Figure 2). Secondary outcome measures differed between RCG and SCG for: Lower median WAT-1 scores at 48 h (5.5 vs 9, P = 0.04), lower overall median WAT-1 scores (5 vs 6, P = 0.03) and lower overall median pain scores (3 vs 6, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between RCG and SCG for median WAT-1 scores at 12, 24, 72 and 96 h. Additionally, the RCG had significantly more VFD and shorter PICU LOS than the SCG (Table 3).
Figure 2

Paired comparison of median withdrawal (Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1) scores between rapid conversion group and slow conversion group at serial time points following initiation of enteral methadone (aP < 0.05). RCG: Rapid conversion group consisted of patients who were completely converted from fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less; SCG: Slow conversion group consisted of patients who were completely converted from fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. WAT-1: Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1.

Table 3

Clinical outcomes in rapid and slow conversion groups

Rapid conversion groupa (n = 21)Slow conversion groupb (n = 21)P value
Ventilator free days at 28 d, d (median, IQR)18 (13.3-18.8)8 (1.5-10.8)< 0.05
Total PICU length of stay, d (median, IQR)17 (12-24)38.5 (24.8-68.5)0.05

Rapid conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less;

Slow conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. IQR: Inter-quartile range; PICU: Pediatric intensive care unit.

Paired comparison of median withdrawal (Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1) scores between rapid conversion group and slow conversion group at serial time points following initiation of enteral methadone (aP < 0.05). RCG: Rapid conversion group consisted of patients who were completely converted from fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less; SCG: Slow conversion group consisted of patients who were completely converted from fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. WAT-1: Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1. Clinical outcomes in rapid and slow conversion groups Rapid conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in 48 h or less; Slow conversion group: Patients who were completely converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone in more than 48 h. IQR: Inter-quartile range; PICU: Pediatric intensive care unit.

DISCUSSION

Critically ill children are at high risk of dependence and withdrawal after prolonged IV opioid infusion use for sedation and analgesia[3]. A significant withdrawal syndrome may occur if IV opioid infusions are abruptly discontinued resulting in considerable morbidity with prolongation of intensive care dependency. Such withdrawal may be minimized, or prevented by a variety of methods including gradually reducing the IV opioid infusion, conversion of the IV opioid infusion to intermittent IV dosing, and conversion of IV opioid infusions to enteral opioids followed by a gradual taper. In this paper, we report the results of our institutional experience with the conversion of IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone and occurrence of subsequent withdrawal in critically ill mechanically ventilated children receiving prolonged sedation. We observed wide variability in conversion from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone and variability in withdrawal in critically ill mechanically ventilated children exposed to prolonged sedation. We also observed that in the subset of children who converted completely from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone within a period of 48 h, a methadone:fentanyl dose conversion ratio of approximately 2.5:1 was associated with less withdrawal and reduced need for rescue opioids. Guidelines and studies describing the conversion of IV opioid infusions such as fentanyl to enteral opioids such as methadone often differ with respect to optimal conversion dose, frequency and duration of therapy[6-9,13-16]. One such published guideline recommends a 1:1 dose conversion of IV fentanyl directly to enteral methadone over a period of 48 h to prevent withdrawal from dependence[13]. Another institutional policy recommends a 2.5:1 conversion ratio from IV fentanyl to IV methadone initially and subsequently to enteral methadone once patients tolerate oral intake[14]. These differences in formulation and dosing of methadone at the time of conversion in these studies and guidelines serve to highlight the paucity of knowledge and likely reflect differences in patient profiles, individual pharmacokinetic variation, and prescriber characteristics. Previous studies have largely focused on transitioning from IV opioid infusions to IV methadone as an intermediate step before transitioning over to enteral methadone[6,7,9]. In contrast, the findings from our study establish that it is feasible to convert from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone within a 48 h time period. Table 4 provides an example using data from our study to illustrate dose conversion using a methadone:fentanyl ratio of 2.5:1. Lugo et al[8] also studied such a direct conversion to enteral methadone, but employed a fixed methadone dose of 0.1 mg/kg administered enterally every 6 h for conversion regardless of IV fentanyl infusion dose at the time of conversion. A direct conversion has the advantage of reducing the need for continued IV access with the potential to decrease IV catheter infiltrates (in the case of peripheral IV catheters) and catheter-associated complications such as infections and thrombosis (in the case of central IV catheters). Additionally, such a strategy can favorably influence hospital admission costs by reducing the overall duration of PICU and hospital LOS as further weaning of enteral medications can take place either on the general floor or even at home[22].
Table 4

Example of dose conversion from intravenous fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone

A 10-kg child is receiving IV fentanyl infusion of 5 mcg/kg per hour. The total daily fentanyl dose is 5 μg/kg per hour × 24 h = 1.2 mg/d
Dose conversion ratio - methadone:fentanyl = 2.5 (rounded up from 2.3 observed in rapid conversion group in the present study that converted from IV fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone within 48 h) based on potency, half-life and enteral bioavailability
Total daily dose of enteral methadone = 2.5 × 1.2 mg/d = 3 mg/d administered in 2 divided doses, i.e., 1.5 mg dosed every 12 h
Following the second dose of enteral methadone, the IV fentanyl infusion is decreased by 50% to 2.5 mcg/kg per hour
Following the third dose of enteral methadone, the IV fentanyl infusion is decreased again by 50% to 1.25 mcg/kg per hour
Following the fourth dose of enteral methadone, the IV fentanyl infusion is discontinued

IV: Intravenous.

Example of dose conversion from intravenous fentanyl infusion directly to enteral methadone IV: Intravenous. In the present study, we included critically ill children with a high likelihood of opioid dependence from exposure to IV fentanyl infusion for greater than 5 d who were converted directly to enteral methadone. Methadone is a commonly used synthetic enteral opioid to prevent opioid withdrawal in our unit due to its long mean elimination half-life in children (19 ± 14 h, range 4-62 h), good oral bioavailability (70% to 100%), low cost and ease of tapering[5-9]. Even though the suggested time frame for conversion was 48 h, we observed that only half the patients (RCG) were converted within this time period (in the absence of a unit specific protocol). This variation may have been due to patient factors such as intercurrent illness or perception of pain that may have influenced the conversion. Additionally, prescribing providers might have been anxious about possible withdrawal symptoms due to the perceived rapid time frame for conversion. Consequently, it is possible that in the RCG patients, providers preferentially used a higher dose of enteral methadone during conversion from IV fentanyl infusions to alleviate such concerns. In the other half of patients (SCG), the approximately 1:1 dose conversion required a longer time frame for conversion (median time of 109 h) raising the possibility that the dose of methadone was inadequate to prevent withdrawal. However, several confounding factors could have delayed the conversion in this group, including co-morbidities and intercurrent procedures that we were unable to adjust for in our analyses due to the small sample size. The SCG group was also observed to have an increase in the IV fentanyl infusion within the first 48 h of conversion, and ultimately ended up with a higher daily median methadone dose compared with the RCG (0.189 mg/kg vs 0.03 mg/kg, P = 0.02) which could possibly reflect an attempt to “catch-up” with withdrawal and pain symptoms. Importantly, when compared to the SCG patients, the RCG patients were observed to have more ventilator free days and shorter PICU length of stay. While association does not imply causation, it is possible that the “higher” initial dose conversion in the RCG minimized withdrawal during conversion and allowed for subsequent progressive weaning of the enteral methadone. In contrast, the SCG which started out with a “lower” initial dose conversion ended up with higher doses of enteral methadone later on that might have resulted in over sedation and prolonged needs for intensive care dependency. However, this observation requires further prospective study in future trials. The current study has several limitations. This was a retrospective review of patients admitted to the PICU and therefore subject to bias from incorrect or missing documentation in the patient charts. We attempted to overcome this limitation with rigorous definitions and integrity of data abstraction that we established a priori. Though it is possible that patients in the RCG happened to experience less withdrawal symptoms and were easier to wean compared to those in the SCG, both groups were well balanced with regard to age, illness severity, diagnoses, and extent of exposure to IV fentanyl infusion (Table 1). The small sample size precluded us from adjusting for confounding factors between the groups to study the independent association of methadone dosing in relation to other clinically relevant outcomes such as ventilator free days and PICU length of stay. The findings from this study cannot be extrapolated to conversions other than from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone. The dosing of enteral methadone was subject to the discretion of the attending physician and the time frame for conversion from the IV infusion, though intended to be 48 h, was variable. This study did not take into account withdrawal symptoms from discontinuation of other medications such as benzodiazepines and barbiturates. Though sedative and analgesic regimens with ketamine and dexmedetomidine could theoretically lower the risk for withdrawal[23,24], none of our patients received either of these medications. The findings of this single center study may not be generalizable to other institutions. Incomplete cross-tolerance could have also complicated assessment of our findings. This phenomenon, in which exposure to one opioid could result in some degree of tolerance with exposure to another opioid, can be partial or complete[25]. Though methadone is commonly prescribed to facilitate conversion from prolonged IV opioid infusion use and minimize opioid withdrawal in the PICU, concerns exist that methadone may be more potent than suggested when using equianalgesic dose conversion ratios from opioids such as morphine[26]. This is particularly notable as a function of prior opioid dose and tends to increase with higher doses with consequent risk for oversedation and toxicities. A recent systematic review by Johnson et al[27] did not find differences between weight-based and formula-based approaches to initial methadone dosing in critically ill children. However, this review did note that children receiving a formula-based approach to dosing tended to experience more instances of oversedation. The authors concluded that the most prudent course is to start with the lowest possible dose and titrate based on clinical response to avoid complications[27]. In recent years, efforts to develop pathways and protocols have emerged as rational approaches to reduce intensive care dependency and rein in healthcare costs by decreasing variations in treatment styles. Our results are similar to the findings of the quality improvement study by Abdouni et al[14] who observed that employing a standardized treatment protocol to convert from IV fentanyl infusion to intermittent methadone dosing using a dose conversion ratio of 2.5:1 reduced the length of opioid exposure and minimized withdrawal symptoms. By observing the feasibility of a direct conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to intermittent enteral methadone, our study provides additional support to further refine such clinical pathways and ultimately improve clinical outcomes for critically ill children. In our institutional experience, we observed wide variation in clinician practice during conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone and variability in withdrawal in critically ill mechanically ventilated children exposed to prolonged sedation. In those children who converted successfully from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone within a period of 48 h, a methadone:fentanyl dose conversion ratio of approximately 2.5:1 appeared to minimize withdrawal with less need for rescue opioids. Further prospective studies are needed to examine the optimum methadone:fentanyl dosing conversion to reduce withdrawal and improve clinical, economic and patient satisfaction outcomes.

COMMENTS

Background

Critically ill children are at high risk of dependence and withdrawal after prolonged intravenous (IV) opioid infusion use for sedation and analgesia which can result in considerable morbidity with prolongation of intensive care dependency. The optimal strategy to minimize such withdrawal remains controversial.

Research frontiers

Direct rapid conversion of IV opioid infusions to enteral medications are ideal to minimize withdrawal as well as enhance patient satisfaction. An additional benefit of such a strategy is to facilitate rapid transition from intensive care to home with decrease in healthcare costs.

Innovations and breakthroughs

In contrast to most previous studies that examined conversion from IV opioid infusions to IV methadone, this study demonstrates the feasibility of a direct conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone within a 48-h time frame with minimal withdrawal in critically ill children.

Applications

In practical terms, a direct conversion from IV fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone over a 48-h timeframe appears to be feasible in a ratio of methadone:fentanyl of 2.5:1 with minimal withdrawal and less need for rescue opioids.

Terminology

FLACC: Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability; IQR: Inter-quartile range; IV: Intravenous; LOS: Length of stay; PICU: Pediatric intensive care unit; PRISM: Pediatric Risk of Mortality; RCG: Rapid conversion group; SCG: Slow conversion group; WAT-1: Withdrawal Assessment Tool-version 1.

Peer-review

The findings are very valuable and should be shared with the scientific community. The corrections are shown as green highlight in the manuscript.
  27 in total

1.  Population-based analysis of methadone distribution and metabolism using an age-dependent physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Xianping Tong; D Gail McCarver; Ronald N Hines; Daniel A Beard
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Dose ratio between morphine and methadone in patients with cancer pain: a retrospective study.

Authors:  P G Lawlor; K S Turner; J Hanson; E D Bruera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Sedation and analgesia in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.132

Review 4.  Ketamine Continuous Infusions in Critically Ill Infants and Children.

Authors:  Charles L Golding; Jamie L Miller; Morris R Gessouroun; Peter N Johnson
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  QT prolongation and torsades de pointes among methadone users: reports to the FDA spontaneous reporting system.

Authors:  Ellen C Pearson; Raymond L Woosley
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Enteral methadone to expedite fentanyl discontinuation and prevent opioid abstinence syndrome in the PICU.

Authors:  R A Lugo; R MacLaren; J Cash; C G Pribble; D D Vernon
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 7.  Opioid tolerance and dependence in infants and children.

Authors:  K J Anand; J H Arnold
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Withdrawal symptoms in critically ill children after long-term administration of sedatives and/or analgesics: a first evaluation.

Authors:  Erwin Ista; Monique van Dijk; Claudia Gamel; Dick Tibboel; Matthijs de Hoog
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Pain assessment in nonverbal children with severe cognitive impairments: the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS).

Authors:  Jean Solodiuk; Martha A Q Curley
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.145

10.  Efficacy of an enteral 10-day methadone wean to prevent opioid withdrawal in fentanyl-tolerant pediatric intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  M M Meyer; R J Berens
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.624

View more
  3 in total

1.  Protocolized Sedative Weaning vs Usual Care in Pediatric Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Duangtip Tiacharoen; Rojjanee Lertbunrian; Jarin Veawpanich; Nattanicha Suppalarkbunlue; Nattachai Anantasit
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-06

2.  L-NAC reverses of the adverse effects of fentanyl infusion on ventilation and blood-gas chemistry.

Authors:  Paulina M Getsy; Santhosh M Baby; Walter J May; Tristan H J Lewis; James N Bates; Yee-Hsee Hsieh; Benjamin Gaston; Stephen J Lewis
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 7.419

3.  Shortened Taper Duration after Implementation of a Standardized Protocol for Iatrogenic Benzodiazepine and Opioid Withdrawal in Pediatric Patients: Results of a Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jane M Vipond; Amy L Heiberger; Paul A Thompson; Jody N Huber
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2018-05-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.