Purpose: Access to pre- and post-transplant supervised exercise programmes in Canada is not consistent across organ types. The opinions of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can contribute to the discussion among stakeholders regarding increasing the availability of supervised exercise programmes. The objective of the study was to determine Canadian SOT recipients' opinions of pre- and post-transplant supervised exercise programmes and the factors that influenced their participation. Method: An Internet-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the Canadian Transplant Association. It was part of a larger survey and examined seven items related to accessibility to, and opinion of, supervised exercise programmes. Results: A total of 35% (n=39) of respondents had attended a pre-transplant exercise programme, and 54% (n=61) had attended a post-transplant exercise programme. The majority of participants believed that a supervised exercise programme was beneficial to health and well-being. Perception of benefits, a physician's recommendation, and health status and symptoms were key influencing factors in the decision of whether to attend a pre- or post-transplant exercise programme. Conclusion: SOT recipients had positive opinions of supervised exercise programmes despite unequal access among organ groups. Some key influencing factors (e.g., a physician's recommendation) are modifiable and should be taken into consideration to encourage participation in such programmes.
Purpose: Access to pre- and post-transplant supervised exercise programmes in Canada is not consistent across organ types. The opinions of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can contribute to the discussion among stakeholders regarding increasing the availability of supervised exercise programmes. The objective of the study was to determine Canadian SOT recipients' opinions of pre- and post-transplant supervised exercise programmes and the factors that influenced their participation. Method: An Internet-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the Canadian Transplant Association. It was part of a larger survey and examined seven items related to accessibility to, and opinion of, supervised exercise programmes. Results: A total of 35% (n=39) of respondents had attended a pre-transplant exercise programme, and 54% (n=61) had attended a post-transplant exercise programme. The majority of participants believed that a supervised exercise programme was beneficial to health and well-being. Perception of benefits, a physician's recommendation, and health status and symptoms were key influencing factors in the decision of whether to attend a pre- or post-transplant exercise programme. Conclusion: SOT recipients had positive opinions of supervised exercise programmes despite unequal access among organ groups. Some key influencing factors (e.g., a physician's recommendation) are modifiable and should be taken into consideration to encourage participation in such programmes.
Entities:
Keywords:
availability of health services; exercise; organ transplantation; rehabilitation; survey
Authors: T Trojetto; R J Elliott; S Rashid; S Wong; K Dlugosz; D Helm; L Wickerson; D Brooks Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Michael J Englesbe; Shaun P Patel; Kevin He; Raymond J Lynch; Douglas E Schaubel; Calista Harbaugh; Sven A Holcombe; Stewart C Wang; Dorry L Segev; Christopher J Sonnenday Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-06-26 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Madeleine Didsbury; Richard G McGee; Allison Tong; Jonathan C Craig; Jeremy R Chapman; Steve Chadban; Germaine Wong Journal: Transplantation Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: S Mathur; T Janaudis-Ferreira; L Wickerson; L G Singer; J Patcai; D Rozenberg; T Blydt-Hansen; E L Hartmann; M Haykowsky; D Helm; K High; N Howes; B M Kamath; L Lands; S Marzolini; C Sonnenday Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Elani Streja; Miklos Z Molnar; Csaba P Kovesdy; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Jennie Jing; Allen R Nissenson; Istvan Mucsi; Gabriel M Danovitch; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Alexander M Clark; Kathryn M King-Shier; Melisa A Spaling; Amanda S Duncan; James A Stone; Susan B Jaglal; David R Thompson; Jan E Angus Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Alexander M Clark; Kathryn M King-Shier; David R Thompson; Melisa A Spaling; Amanda S Duncan; James A Stone; Susan B Jaglal; Jan E Angus Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-10-29 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Dorien M Zelle; Eva Corpeleijn; Gerald Klaassen; Elise Schutte; Gerjan Navis; Stephan J L Bakker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Giulio Sergio Roi; Giovanni Mosconi; Valentina Totti; Maria Laura Angelini; Erica Brugin; Patrizio Sarto; Laura Merlo; Sergio Sgarzi; Michele Stancari; Paola Todeschini; Gaetano La Manna; Andrea Ermolao; Ferdinando Tripi; Lucia Andreoli; Gianluigi Sella; Alberto Anedda; Laura Stefani; Giorgio Galanti; Rocco Di Michele; Franco Merni; Manuela Trerotola; Daniela Storani; Alessandro Nanni Costa Journal: World J Transplant Date: 2018-02-24