Literature DB >> 28538231

Informal Peer-Assisted Learning Groups Did Not Lead to Better Performance of Saudi Dental Students.

Maha AbdelSalam, Maha El Tantawi, Asim Al-Ansari, Adel AlAgl, Fahad Al-Harbi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe peer-assisted learning (PAL) groups formed by dental undergraduate students in a biomedical course and to investigate the association of individual and group characteristics with academic performance. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 2015, 92 fourth-year students (43 males and 49 females) in the College of Dentistry, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia, were invited to form PAL groups to study a unit of a biomedical course. An examination was used to assess their knowledge after 2 weeks. In addition, a questionnaire and social network analysis were used to investigate (1) individual student attributes: gender, role, subject matter knowledge, grade in previous year, teaming with friends, previous communication with teammates, and content discussion, and (2) group attributes: group teacher's previous grade, number of colleagues with whom a student connected, teaming with friends, similarity of teammates' previous grades, and teacher having higher previous grades than other teammates. Regression analysis was used to assess the association of examination scores with individual and group attributes.
RESULTS: The response rate was 80.4% (74 students: 36 males and 38 females). Students who previously scored grades A and B had higher examination scores than students with grades C/less (regression coefficient = 18.50 and 13.39) within the groups. Higher scores were not associated with working in groups including friends only (regression coefficient = 1.17) or when all students had similar previous grades (regression coefficient = 0.85).
CONCLUSIONS: Students with previous high grades benefited to a greater extent from working in PAL groups. Similarity of teammates in PAL groups was not associated with better scores.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Keywords:  Academic performance; Learning analytics; Peer-assisted learning; Social network analysis; Study groups; Undergraduate dental students

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28538231      PMCID: PMC5768107          DOI: 10.1159/000477731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Princ Pract        ISSN: 1011-7571            Impact factor:   1.927


  19 in total

1.  The Supplemental Instruction Project: peer-devised and delivered tutorials.

Authors:  Katrina F Hurley; Donald W McKay; Thomas M Scott; Bonnie M James
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Peer-led resuscitation training for healthcare students: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Gavin D Perkins; J Hulme; Julian F Bion
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Docemur Docemus: Peer-Assisted Learning Improves the Knowledge Gain of Tutors in the Highest Quartile of Achievement but Not Those in the Lowest Quartile.

Authors:  Claire L Donohoe; John B Conneely; Nathan Zilbert; Martina Hennessy; Susie Schofield; John V Reynolds
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  The hidden medical school: a longitudinal study of how social networks form, and how they relate to academic performance.

Authors:  Katherine Woolf; Henry W W Potts; Shalini Patel; I Chris McManus
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Peer teaching: a randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Ralf Münker; Richard M Sellei; Malte Holschen; Saskia C Mooij; Bernhard Schmidt-Rohlfing; Fritz-Uwe Niethard; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Do peer-tutors perform better in examinations? An analysis of medical school final examination results.

Authors:  Kazuya Iwata; Daniel S Furmedge; Alison Sturrock; Deborah Gill
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Patterns of interaction during rounds: implications for work-based learning.

Authors:  Jennifer M Walton; Yvonne Steinert
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Visualising the invisible: a network approach to reveal the informal social side of student learning.

Authors:  J Hommes; B Rienties; W de Grave; G Bos; L Schuwirth; A Scherpbier
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.853

9.  Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school.

Authors:  Tzu-Chieh Yu; Nichola C Wilson; Primal P Singh; Daniel P Lemanu; Susan J Hawken; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2011-06-23

10.  Near peer teaching in medical curricula: integrating student teachers in pathology tutorials.

Authors:  Nicholas Tayler; Samuel Hall; Norman J Carr; Jonny R Stephens; Scott Border
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-06-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing the impacts of reciprocal peer teaching with faculty teaching: A single-centre experience from KSA.

Authors:  Saad M AlShareef
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.