Literature DB >> 28538025

A Cluster RCT to Reduce Workers' Sitting Time: Impact on Cardiometabolic Biomarkers.

Genevieve N Healy1, Elisabeth A H Winkler, Elizabeth G Eakin, Neville Owen, Anthony D Lamontagne, Marj Moodie, David W Dunstan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the initial and long-term impacts on cardiometabolic health indicators of the Stand Up Victoria intervention-a 12-month, multicomponent workplace-delivered intervention that successfully reduced overall sitting time, primarily by increasing standing time.
METHODS: Office worksites (≥1 km apart) from a single organization were cluster randomized to intervention (n = 7) or control (n = 7). Participants were 136 intervention and 95 control desk-based workers (5-39 per worksite; 68% women; mean ± SD age = 45.6 ± 9.4 yr). Outcomes, assessed at baseline (0 months), 3, and 12 months, were 14 individual biomarkers of body composition, blood pressure, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and a composite overall cardiometabolic risk score. Intervention effects were assessed by linear mixed models, accounting for repeated measures and clustering, baseline values, and potential confounders. Missing data were multiply imputed. Significance was set at P < 0.05, two-tailed.
RESULTS: No significant intervention effects were observed at 3 months. Significant effects, favoring intervention, were observed at 12 months for fasting glucose (-0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.65 to -0.03; P = 0.028 mmol·L) and the overall cardiometabolic risk score (-0.11, 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.00; P = 0.046). Other intervention effects were typically weakly in favor of the intervention group, but were nonsignificant and estimated with wide CI.
CONCLUSIONS: In "healthy" workers (not selected as having any specific health condition), a workplace intervention showed a small benefit for improving biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk, but only with 12 months of intervention and not for all biomarkers. Long-term facilitation of movement and standing at work may be a useful approach to reducing cardiovascular disease risk in the working population. The potential benefits for workers at high risk for cardiovascular disease (e.g., with diabetes) may be even greater and merit investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28538025     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  37 in total

1.  Acute Effect of Height-Adjustable Workstations on Blood Glucose Levels in Women With Impaired Fasting Glucose Levels While Working: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Amanda R Bonikowske; Katie C Carpenter; Steven D Stovitz; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Mark A Pereira; Beth A Lewis
Journal:  Transl J Am Coll Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-27

2.  An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Glenn A Gaesser; Noe C Crespo; Peter Hannan; Linda Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Mark A Pereira
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.

Authors:  Sharon P Parry; Pieter Coenen; Nipun Shrestha; Peter B O'Sullivan; Christopher G Maher; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-17

4.  The Effectiveness of Sedentary Behaviour Reduction Workplace Interventions on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marsha L Brierley; Angel M Chater; Lindsey R Smith; Daniel P Bailey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Prolonged standing increases lower limb arterial stiffness.

Authors:  Aaron R Caldwell; Kaitlin M Gallagher; Benjamin T Harris; Megan E Rosa-Caldwell; Marcus Payne; Bryce Daniels; Matthew S Ganio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Office workers' objectively assessed total and prolonged sitting time: Individual-level correlates and worksite variations.

Authors:  Nyssa T Hadgraft; Genevieve N Healy; Neville Owen; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Brigid M Lynch; Parneet Sethi; Elizabeth G Eakin; Marj Moodie; Anthony D LaMontagne; Glen Wiesner; Lisa Willenberg; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-06-15

7.  Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers' sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial.

Authors:  C L Brakenridge; B S Fjeldsoe; D C Young; E A H Winkler; D W Dunstan; L M Straker; G N Healy
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Taking a Stand: The Effects of Standing Desks on Task Performance and Engagement.

Authors:  Laura E Finch; A Janet Tomiyama; Andrew Ward
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Breaking Up Sitting with Light-Intensity Physical Activity: Implications for Shift-Workers.

Authors:  Grace E Vincent; Sarah M Jay; Corneel Vandelanotte; Sally A Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Accelerometer-assessed sedentary work, leisure time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers during one year: Effectiveness of a cluster randomized controlled trial in parents with a sedentary occupation and young children.

Authors:  Arto J Pesola; Arto Laukkanen; Risto Heikkinen; Sarianna Sipilä; Arja Sääkslahti; Taija Finni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.