Literature DB >> 28537449

Understanding how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences of basal analog insulins influence clinical practice.

Jennifer Goldman1, Christoph Kapitza2, Jeremy Pettus3, Tim Heise2.   

Abstract

This article reviews pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) concepts relating to the pharmacology of basal insulin analogs. Understanding the pharmacology of currently available long-acting basal insulins and the techniques used to assess PK and PD parameters (e.g. the euglycemic clamp method) is important when considering the efficacy and safety of these agents, and can help in understanding the rationale for specific dosing strategies when tailoring therapy for a specific patient. Basal insulins such as insulin glargine 100 units (U)/mL and insulin detemir show improved PK/PD characteristics compared with the intermediate-acting NPH insulin, with a longer duration of action, a more consistent glucose-lowering effect and less prominent concentration peaks. However, more recently developed basal insulins (insulin glargine 300 U/mL, and insulin degludec 100 U/mL and 200 U/mL) have PK/PD profiles closer to the physiologic profile of endogenous basal insulin owing to a more evenly distributed, predictable and prolonged time-action profile that exceeds 24 hours and improved within-patient variability in glucose-lowering effect. The clinical implications and relevance of these PK/PD profiles is explored, including the potential effect of PK/PD parameters on glycemic control and hypoglycemia, and the timing of dosing. The improved PK/PD properties of newer longer-acting basal insulins may translate into clinical benefits for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, such as more consistent insulin levels in the blood over 24 hours, lower intra-patient variability, a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia, and more flexibility in dosing time, all of which are important to consider when choosing a basal insulin regimen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Insulins; diabetes mellitus; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28537449     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1335192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  15 in total

1.  Basal insulin reductions in anticipation of multiple exercise sessions in people with type 1 diabetes-a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Olivia McCarthy; Steve C Bain; Rachel Deere
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

2.  How conclusive is the CONCLUDE trial?

Authors:  Stefano Del Prato
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Adjustment of insulin doses when switching from glargine 100 U/ml or detemir to degludec: an observational study.

Authors:  C Lualdi; A Silverii; I Dicembrini; L Pala; M Monami; E Mannucci
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Glargine-300: An updated literature review on randomized controlled trials and real-world studies.

Authors:  Sujoy Ghosh; Romik Ghosh
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2020-04-15

6.  Switching From Glargine to Degludec: The Effect on Metabolic Control and Safety During 1-Year of Real Clinical Practice in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Barbara Predieri; Tosca Suprani; Giulio Maltoni; Vanna Graziani; Patrizia Bruzzi; Stefano Zucchini; Lorenzo Iughetti
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  The basal to total insulin ratio in outpatients with diabetes on basal-bolus regimen.

Authors:  Elena Castellano; R Attanasio; V A Giagulli; A Boriano; M Terzolo; E Papini; E Guastamacchia; S Monti; A Aglialoro; D Agrimi; E Ansaldi; A C Babini; A Blatto; D Brancato; C Casile; S Cassibba; C Crescenti; M L De Feo; A Del Prete; O Disoteo; F Ermetici; V Fiore; A Fusco; D Gioia; A Grassi; D Gullo; F Lo Pomo; A Miceli; M Nizzoli; M Pellegrino; B Pirali; C Santini; S Settembrini; E Tortato; V Triggiani; A Vacirca; G Borretta
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2018-10-01

8.  Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Insulin Matters: A Practical Approach to Basal Insulin Management in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Lori Berard; Noreen Antonishyn; Kathryn Arcudi; Sarah Blunden; Alice Cheng; Ronald Goldenberg; Stewart Harris; Shelley Jones; Upender Mehan; James Morrell; Robert Roscoe; Rick Siemens; Michael Vallis; Jean-François Yale
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.945

10.  Cost analysis of insulin degludec in comparison with insulin detemir in treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the UK.

Authors:  Nandu Thalange; Jens Gundgaard; Witesh Parekh; Deniz Tutkunkardas
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2019-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.