| Literature DB >> 28537270 |
Henrik T Lemke1,2, Kasper S Kjær3,4,5, Robert Hartsock1,3, Tim B van Driel1,4, Matthieu Chollet1, James M Glownia1, Sanghoon Song1, Diling Zhu1, Elisabetta Pace6, Samir F Matar7, Martin M Nielsen4, Maurizio Benfatto6, Kelly J Gaffney8, Eric Collet9, Marco Cammarata9.
Abstract
The description of ultrafast nonadiabatic chemical dynamics during molecular photo-transformations remains challenging because electronic and nuclear configurations impact each other and cannot be treated independently. Here we gain experimental insights, beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, into the light-induced spin-state trapping dynamics of the prototypical [Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28537270 PMCID: PMC5458100 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1X-ray absorption fingerprints of molecular transformation.
(a) Schematic light-induced excited spin-state trapping for [Fe(bpy)3]2+, where the Fe (red) is bonded to six N (blue) of the bpy ligands (L). After the initial photoexcitation of the LS (t2g6eg0L0) state into an MLCT state (t2g5eg0L1), the system decays towards the HS (t2g4eg2L0) state. (b) Schematic experimental setup with 25(5) fs RMS time resolution. The X-ray beam from a free electron laser is monochromatized by a double diamond (111) crystal and focused to ∼10 μm by means of Beryllium X-ray lenses for probing [Fe(bpy)3]2+ dissolved in water. (c) Changes between the LS and HS XANES spectra. Arrows indicate photon energies for which high time resolution data have been measured. (d) The HS/LS spectra change ratio (magenta line, measured at 10 ps) and the expected ratio between MLCT and LS state (orange solid line) calculated as a +1 eV shift of the MLCT spectrum with respect to the measured LS one. The dots in (d) are the measured MLCT amplitude based on a global fit of the data (see text and Fig. 2). Both curves have been scaled to 100% conversion.
Figure 2Following dynamics in real time.
(a) Time scans of relative absorption change at selected X-ray energies (solid grey lines) revealing 126(3) cm−1 oscillations (265 fs period). Red lines correspond to the global fit of the entire data set with an empirical model (Supplementary Information). While all amplitude parameters have been varied for every X-ray energy, the dynamic parameters are the same for all energies: MLCT lifetime τMLCT=120(10) fs, oscillation period TOSC=265(10) fs and damping τOSC=320(10) fs and vibrational cooling τVC=1.6(0.1) ps. Orange lines represent the MLCT contributions. (b) Example fit for 7,121.5 eV (top panel), showing the individual contributions of MLCT and oscillating HS contributions along with the total signal. The inset shows the data on a longer time window. The model disentangles the electronic kinetic description (MLCT and HS population, mid panel) from the structural dynamics given by the time evolution of the Fe-N distance r (bottom panel). The exponential growth of the HS population from the MLCT intermediate state leads to an average coherent oscillating trajectory . This has a reduced amplitude and apparent phase shift (∼50 fs) with respect to a directly initiated damped oscillating trajectory r1(t) in the HS potential. The incoherent part of the molecular oscillations, the transient distribution width in r, decays within 1.6 ps.
Figure 3HS normal modes.
(a) Fe-N bond coordinate and average length r for a1g and eg symmetry normal modes. (b–f) Respective representation of normal breathing mode (124.4 cm−1, in-phase stretching of the 6 Fe-Ni bonds with almost rigid bpy ligands), the global stretching mode (353.4 cm−1, bpy and Fe-N stretching), stretching modes at 114.8 and 115.9 cm−1 and a bending mode at 138.8 cm−1. Green arrows show N motions and grey ones ligand motions. (g–i) Time evolution of the symmetry independent bonds r1, r2 and r3 with respect to inversion symmetry and their average r (purple).
Figure 4Coherent versus incoherent structural dynamics.
(a) XANES spectra calculated for a variety of Fe-N distances r from 2 Å (blue) to 2.4 Å (gold). (b) experimental data at 7,156 eV (blue), together with calculated signals for the distance distribution g(r, t) (red) of an ensemble motion model (red in Fig. 5c) or its average value r(t) (green). The data are significantly better reproduced by simulations, including the evolving ensemble width distribution. The right y scale represents the calculated width change Δσ of a normal distributed approximation of g(r, t) based on the expansion of the EXAFS equation.
Figure 5Contribution of intermediates to transient molecular distribution.
Simulations of the transient molecular distribution in coordinate r for MLCT→HS (τMLCT=120 fs) and MLCT→3T→HS (τT=70 fs) electronic state transition (a–c,d–f, respectively). The time-dependent populations of the different electronic states are shown in panels (a and d), which give rise to the calculated distribution g(r, t) and average coordinate r: (c,f). The experimental data at 7,145 eV (blue) scaled in r has additionally been overlaid with the simulated signal (b,e).
Figure 6Structural trapping dynamics.
(a) Schematic representation of the structural trapping during the light-induced spin-state conversion in [Fe(bpy)3]2+ from LS to HS state along the Fe-N distance reaction coordinate r. The photoexcited MLCT (manifold) decays, through the 3T state (t2g5eg1L0), towards the HS state within (120(10) fs) and a large fraction of energy is dissipated. It expands and coherently oscillates (breathing mode, 265 fs period) around the HS equilibrium structure while losing energy. The wave packet disperses at 330 fs time constant and vibrationally cools inside the HS state potential within 1.6 ps. (b) Schematic time evolution of the wave packet in the HS potential based on the simulated distribution model.