Literature DB >> 28536833

Development of standardized image interpretation for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect prostate cancer recurrent lesions.

Stefano Fanti1, Silvia Minozzi2, Joshua James Morigi3, Frederik Giesel4, Francesco Ceci1, Christian Uprimny5, Michael S Hofman6, Matthias Eiber7, Sarah Schwarzenbock8, Paolo Castellucci1, Cristina Bellisario9, Stéphane Chauvie10, Fabrizio Bergesio10, Louise Emmett11, Uwe Haberkorn4, Irene Virgolini5, Markus Schwaiger7, Rodney J Hicks6, Bernd J Krause8, Arturo Chiti12.   

Abstract

METHODS: After primary treatment, biochemical relapse (BCR) occurs in a substantial number of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). PET/CT imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen based tracers (68Ga-PSMA) has shown promising results for BCR patients. However, a standardized image interpretation methodology has yet to be properly agreed. The aim of this study, which was promoted and funded by European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), is to define standardized image interpretation criteria for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect recurrent PCa lesions in patients treated with primary curative intent therapy (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) who presented a biochemical recurrence. In the first phase inter-rater agreement between seven readers from seven international centers was calculated on the reading of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images of 49 patients with BCR. Each reader evaluated findings in five different sites of recurrence (local, loco-regional lymph nodes, distant lymph nodes, bone, and other). In the second phase the re-analysis was limited to cases with poor, slight, fair, or moderate agreement [Krippendorff's (K) alpha<0.61]. Finally, on the basis of the consensus readings, we sought to define a list of revised consensus criteria for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT interpretation.
RESULTS: Between-reader agreement for the presence of anomalous findings in any of the five sites was only moderate (K's alpha: 0.47). The agreement improved and became substantial when readers had to judge whether the anomalous findings were suggestive for a pathologic, uncertain, or non-pathologic image (K's alpha: 0.64). K's alpha calculations for each of the five sites of recurrence were also performed and evaluated. First Delphi round was thus conducted. A more detailed definition of the criteria was proposed by the project coordinator, which was then discussed and finally agreed by the seven readers. After the second Delphi round only four cases of disagreement still remained. These were evaluated for a final round, allowing a final agreement table to be written.
CONCLUSION: We hope that by developing these consensus guidelines on the interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, clinicians reporting these studies will be able to provide more consistent clinical reports and that within clinical trials, abnormality classifications will be harmonized, allowing more robust assessment of its diagnostic performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical recurrence; Consensus guidelines; Criteria; PSMA; Pet/Ct; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28536833     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3725-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  31 in total

1.  (11)C-Choline PET/CT for restaging prostate cancer. Results from 4,426 scans in a single-centre patient series.

Authors:  Tiziano Graziani; Francesco Ceci; Paolo Castellucci; Giulia Polverari; Giacomo Maria Lima; Filippo Lodi; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Andrea Ardizzoni; Riccardo Schiavina; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Prostate cancer: role of pretreatment multiparametric 3-T MRI in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jung Jae Park; Chan Kyo Kim; Sung Yoon Park; Byung Kwan Park; Hyun Moo Lee; Seong Whi Cho
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Role of imaging and biopsy to assess local recurrence after definitive treatment for prostate carcinoma (surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, HIFU).

Authors:  Pasquale Martino; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Paolo Consonni; Carlo Trombetta; Silvano Palazzo; Carmen Maccagnano; Giovanni Liguori; Massimo Valentino; Michele Battaglia; Libero Barozzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Prostate cancer, version 2.2014.

Authors:  James L Mohler; Philip W Kantoff; Andrew J Armstrong; Robert R Bahnson; Michael Cohen; Anthony Victor D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Thomas A Farrington; Celestia S Higano; Eric Mark Horwitz; Christopher J Kane; Mark H Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Timothy M Kuzel; Richard J Lee; Arnold W Malcolm; David Miller; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; David Raben; Sylvia Richey; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Stan Rosenfeld; Edward Schaeffer; Eric J Small; Guru Sonpavde; Sandy Srinivas; Cy Stein; Seth A Strope; Jonathan Tward; Dorothy A Shead; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  A model that predicts the probability of positive imaging in prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after initial definitive local therapy.

Authors:  Toni K Choueiri; Robert Dreicer; Alan Paciorek; Peter R Carroll; Badrinath Konety
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Assessment of interobserver reproducibility in quantitative 18F-FDG PET and CT measurements of tumor response to therapy.

Authors:  Heather A Jacene; Sophie Leboulleux; Shingo Baba; Daniel Chatzifotiadis; Behnaz Goudarzi; Oleg Teytelbaum; Karen M Horton; Ihab Kamel; Katarzyna J Macura; Hua-Ling Tsai; Jeanne Kowalski; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  David Pfister; Michel Bolla; Alberto Briganti; Peter Carroll; Cesare Cozzarini; Steven Joniau; Hein van Poppel; Mack Roach; Andrew Stephenson; Thomas Wiegel; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Target Definition in Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: The Role of Advanced Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Gaël Amzalag; Olivier Rager; Claire Tabouret-Viaud; Michael Wissmeyer; Electra Sfakianaki; Thomas de Perrot; Osman Ratib; Raymond Miralbell; Giampiero Giovacchini; Valentina Garibotto; Thomas Zilli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  31 in total

1.  [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT Improves Initial Staging and Management Plan of Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Nader Hirmas; Akram Al-Ibraheem; Ken Herrmann; Abedalatif Alsharif; Haider Muhsin; Jamal Khader; Ali Al-Daghmin; Samer Salah
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Novel Structured Reporting Systems for Theranostic Radiotracers.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Ralph A Bundschuh; Lena Bundschuh; Stefano Fanti; Mehrbod S Javadi; Takahiro Higuchi; Alexander Weich; Kenneth J Pienta; Andreas K Buck; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Ken Herrmann; Constantin Lapa; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Prostate cancer imaging: when the game gets tough, the hard one gets done!

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Matteo Sepulcri; Marco Maruzzo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System PSMA-RADS 1.0 on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Ralph A Bundschuh; Lena Bundschuh; Mehrbod S Javadi; Jeffrey P Leal; Takahiro Higuchi; Kenneth J Pienta; Andreas K Buck; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Constantin Lapa; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Follow-up of Lesions with Equivocal Radiotracer Uptake on PSMA-Targeted PET in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Predictive Values of the PSMA-RADS-3A and PSMA-RADS-3B Categories.

Authors:  Yafu Yin; Rudolf A Werner; Takahiro Higuchi; Constantin Lapa; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Imaging Prostate Cancer With Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT and PET/MRI: Current and Future Applications.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Matthias Eiber; Louise Emmett; Wolfgang P Fendler; Courtney Lawhn-Heath; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Impact of forced diuresis with furosemide and hydration on the halo artefact and intensity of tracer accumulation in the urinary bladder and kidneys on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Christian Uprimny; Steffen Bayerschmidt; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Josef Fritz; Bernhard Nilica; Anna Svirydenka; Clemens Decristoforo; Gianpaolo di Santo; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and PSA <0.5 ng/ml. Efficacy and impact on treatment strategy.

Authors:  Andrea Farolfi; Francesco Ceci; Paolo Castellucci; Tiziano Graziani; Giambattista Siepe; Alessandro Lambertini; Riccardo Schiavina; Filippo Lodi; Alessio G Morganti; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Prediction nomogram for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in different clinical settings of PSA failure after radical treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Lorenzo Bianchi; Marco Borghesi; Giulia Polverari; Andrea Farolfi; Alberto Briganti; Riccardo Schiavina; Eugenio Brunocilla; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Recent updates and developments in PET imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Geoffrey B Johnson; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Spencer C Behr
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.