Literature DB >> 28536202

Conclusion that fishing-induced evolution is negligible follows from model assumptions.

Katja Enberg1, Christian Jørgensen2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28536202      PMCID： PMC5465923          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1700708114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Roles of density-dependent growth and life history evolution in accounting for fisheries-induced trait changes.

Authors:  Anne Maria Eikeset; Erin S Dunlop; Mikko Heino; Geir Storvik; Nils C Stenseth; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A review of quantitative genetic components of fitness in salmonids: implications for adaptation to future change.

Authors:  Stephanie M Carlson; Todd R Seamons
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Implications of fisheries-induced evolution for stock rebuilding and recovery.

Authors:  Katja Enberg; Christian Jørgensen; Erin S Dunlop; Mikko Heino; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.183
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reply to Enberg and Jørgensen: Ecology and evolution both matter for explaining stock dynamics.

Authors:  Anne Maria Eikeset; Erin S Dunlop; Mikko Heino; Geir Storvik; Nils C Stenseth; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fisheries management as a Stackelberg Evolutionary Game: Finding an evolutionarily enlightened strategy.

Authors:  Monica Salvioli; Johan Dubbeldam; Kateřina Staňková; Joel S Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.