Literature DB >> 28535951

Experimental hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials incorporating a novel surfactant compared with commercial VPS.

Shahab Ud Din1, Sandra Parker2, Michael Braden2, Pete Tomlins3, Mangala Patel2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To formulate experimental hydrophilic (Exp) VPS impression materials incorporating a novel surfactant (Rhodasurf CET-2), and to compare their contact angles (CAs) with commercial materials, before/after disinfection.
METHODS: CAs were measured immediately after setting and after disinfection (1% NaOCl; 30min and 24h), together with their change whilst a droplet remained on the materials surface (over 10, 20, 30 60 and 120s), on three commercial (Aquasil Ultra-Monophase [Aq M], Elite HD-Monophase [Elt M], Extrude Medium-bodied [Extr M]) and four experimental (Exp I-IV) materials, using the Drop Shape Analysis 100 technique. The results were compared statistically.
RESULTS: CAs of all experimental materials were within the range of those obtained for the commercial materials, with the exception of Exp-IV, which presented with the lowest CAs at the three time points. The control Exp-I was hydrophobic at all three time points (CAs ∼100+), as was Elite. Immediately after setting, Aq M had low CAs but these increased significantly after 30min of disinfection. After twenty four hours' disinfection CAs of all Exp/commercial VPS increased significantly compared to immediately after setting. The CAs of droplets left on the material (120s) decreased with time, even after disinfection, except for Exp-I. SIGNIFICANCE: The novel surfactant Rhodasurf CET-2 in Exp-III and IV, is an effective surfactant, retaining a low CA after disinfection, compared with Igepal CO-530 in Aq M. Disinfecting VPS impression materials for more than 30min increases their surface CAs, and therefore prolonged disinfection periods should be avoided.
Copyright © 2017 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contact angles; Dental impression materials; Disinfection; Elastomers; Hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28535951     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the Hardness of Novel Experimental Vinyl Poly Siloxane (VPS) Impression Materials with Commercially Available Ones.

Authors:  Shahab Ud Din; Farooq Ahmad Chaudhary; Bilal Ahmed; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Sandra Parker; Mangala Patel; Muhammad Qasim Javed
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.