Sasha M Barnett1, Naiman A Khan2,3,4, Anne M Walk2, Lauren B Raine5, Christopher Moulton6, Neal J Cohen7,8,9, Arthur F Kramer5,8, Billy R Hammond10, Lisa Renzi-Hammond10, Charles H Hillman5,11. 1. a School of Food Science, Washington State University , Pullman , WA , USA. 2. b Department of Kinesiology and Community Health , University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign , IL , USA. 3. c Neuroscience Program , University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign , IL , USA. 4. d Division of Nutritional Sciences , University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign , IL , USA. 5. e Department of Psychology , Northeastern University , Boston , MA , USA. 6. f Abbott Nutrition , Champaign , IL , USA. 7. g Department of Psychology , University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign , IL , USA. 8. h Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign , IL , USA. 9. i Center for Nutrition, Learning, and Memory , University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign , IL , USA. 10. j Department of Psychology , University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA. 11. k Department of Health Sciences , Northeastern University , Boston , MA , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) - a non-invasive indicator of retinal xanthophylls and correlate of brain lutein - has been associated with superior cognitive function among adult populations. Given that lutein accumulation in the brain occurs in early life, it is possible that the cognitive implications of greater MPOD may be evident in childhood. METHODS: Participants aged 8-9 years (n = 56) completed MPOD measurements via heterochromatic flicker photometry. Academic performance was assessed using the Kaufman Test of Academic and Educational Achievement II (KTEA). Habitual dietary intake of L and Z was measured among a subsample of participants (n = 35) using averaged 3-day food records. Stepwise hierarchical regression models were developed to determine the relationship between MPOD and academic achievement tests, following the adjustment of key covariates including sex, aerobic fitness, body composition, and intelligence quotient (IQ). RESULTS: The regression analyses revealed that MPOD improved the model, beyond the covariates, for overall academic achievement (ΔR2 = 0.10, P < 0.01), mathematics (ΔR2 = 0.07, P = 0.02), and written language composite standard scores (ΔR2 = 0.15, P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that retinal L and Z, measured as MPOD, is positively related to academic achievement in children, even after accounting for the robust effects of IQ and other demographic factors. These findings extend the positive associations observed between MPOD and cognitive abilities to a pediatric population. Trail registration: The Fitness Improves Thinking in Kids 2 (FITKids2) trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01619826.
OBJECTIVE: Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) - a non-invasive indicator of retinal xanthophylls and correlate of brain lutein - has been associated with superior cognitive function among adult populations. Given that lutein accumulation in the brain occurs in early life, it is possible that the cognitive implications of greater MPOD may be evident in childhood. METHODS:Participants aged 8-9 years (n = 56) completed MPOD measurements via heterochromatic flicker photometry. Academic performance was assessed using the Kaufman Test of Academic and Educational Achievement II (KTEA). Habitual dietary intake of L and Z was measured among a subsample of participants (n = 35) using averaged 3-day food records. Stepwise hierarchical regression models were developed to determine the relationship between MPOD and academic achievement tests, following the adjustment of key covariates including sex, aerobic fitness, body composition, and intelligence quotient (IQ). RESULTS: The regression analyses revealed that MPOD improved the model, beyond the covariates, for overall academic achievement (ΔR2 = 0.10, P < 0.01), mathematics (ΔR2 = 0.07, P = 0.02), and written language composite standard scores (ΔR2 = 0.15, P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that retinal L and Z, measured as MPOD, is positively related to academic achievement in children, even after accounting for the robust effects of IQ and other demographic factors. These findings extend the positive associations observed between MPOD and cognitive abilities to a pediatric population. Trail registration: The Fitness Improves Thinking in Kids 2 (FITKids2) trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01619826.
Authors: B R Hammond; E J Johnson; R M Russell; N I Krinsky; K J Yeum; R B Edwards; D M Snodderly Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Keita Kamijo; Matthew B Pontifex; Naiman A Khan; Lauren B Raine; Mark R Scudder; Eric S Drollette; Ellen M Evans; Darla M Castelli; Charles H Hillman Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Keita Kamijo; Naiman A Khan; Matthew B Pontifex; Mark R Scudder; Eric S Drollette; Lauren B Raine; Ellen M Evans; Darla M Castelli; Charles H Hillman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Sarah U Morton; Brian J Leyshon; Eleonora Tamilia; Rutvi Vyas; Michaela Sisitsky; Imran Ladha; John B Lasekan; Matthew J Kuchan; P Ellen Grant; Yangming Ou Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Erica E D'Souza; Rutvi Vyas; Michaela Sisitsky; Henry A Feldman; Borjan Gagoski; Jonathan Litt; Ryan J Larsen; Matthew J Kuchan; John B Lasekan; Brad P Sutton; Patricia Ellen Grant; Yangming Ou; Sarah U Morton Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Regan L Bailey; Tieraona Low Dog; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Sai Krupa Das; Fiona C Baker; Zeynep Madak-Erdogan; Billy R Hammond; Howard D Sesso; Alex Eapen; Susan H Mitmesser; Andrea Wong; Haiuyen Nguyen Journal: J Nutr Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 4.687
Authors: Sarah E Saint; Lisa M Renzi-Hammond; Naiman A Khan; Charles H Hillman; Janet E Frick; Billy R Hammond Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Monika A Zielinska; Jadwiga Hamulka; Iwona Grabowicz-Chądrzyńska; Joanna Bryś; Aleksandra Wesolowska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Naiman A Khan; Corinne Cannavale; Samantha Iwinski; Ruyu Liu; Gabriella M McLoughlin; Linda G Steinberg; Anne M Walk Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Hiya A Mahmassani; Karen M Switkowski; Tammy M Scott; Elizabeth J Johnson; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Emily Oken; Paul F Jacques Journal: J Nutr Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Ateka Al-Hassan; Rutvi Vyas; Yue Zhang; Michaela Sisitsky; Borjan Gagoski; Jonathan S Litt; Ryan J Larsen; Matthew J Kuchan; John B Lasekan; Brad P Sutton; Patricia Ellen Grant; Yangming Ou; Sarah U Morton Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 5.717