Literature DB >> 28535101

Design Challenges of an Episode-Based Payment Model in Oncology: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model.

Ronald M Kline1, L Daniel Muldoon1, Heidi K Schumacher1, Larisa M Strawbridge1, Andrew W York1, Laura K Mortimer1, Alison F Falb1, Katherine J Cox1, Carol Bazell1, Ellen W Lukens1, Mary C Kapp1, Rahul Rajkumar1, Amy Bassano1, Patrick H Conway1.   

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services developed the Oncology Care Model as an episode-based payment model to encourage participating practitioners to provide higher-quality, better-coordinated care at a lower cost to the nearly three-quarter million fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with cancer who receive chemotherapy each year. Episode payment models can be complex. They combine into a single benchmark price all payments for services during an episode of illness, many of which may be delivered at different times by different providers in different locations. Policy and technical decisions include the definition of the episode, including its initiation, duration, and included services; the identification of beneficiaries included in the model; and beneficiary attribution to practitioners with overall responsibility for managing their care. In addition, the calculation and risk adjustment of benchmark episode prices for the bundle of services must reflect geographic cost variations and diverse patient populations, including varying disease subtypes, medical comorbidities, changes in standards of care over time, the adoption of expensive new drugs (especially in oncology), as well as diverse practice patterns. Other steps include timely monitoring and intervention as needed to avoid shifting the attribution of beneficiaries on the basis of their expected episode expenditures as well as to ensure the provision of necessary medical services and the development of a meaningful link to quality measurement and improvement through the episode-based payment methodology. The complex and diverse nature of oncology business relationships and the specific rules and requirements of Medicare payment systems for different types of providers intensify these issues. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services believes that by sharing its approach to addressing these decisions and challenges, it may facilitate greater understanding of the model within the oncology community and provide insight to others considering the development of episode-based payment models in the commercial or government sectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28535101      PMCID: PMC5508445          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2016.015834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  8 in total

1.  Medicare's New Bundled Payments: Design, Strategy, and Evolution.

Authors:  Matthew J Press; Rahul Rajkumar; Patrick H Conway
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  National Health Spending In 2014: Faster Growth Driven By Coverage Expansion And Prescription Drug Spending.

Authors:  Anne B Martin; Micah Hartman; Joseph Benson; Aaron Catlin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Specialty Payment Model Opportunities and Assessment: Oncology Model Design Report.

Authors:  Peter J Huckfeldt; Chris Chan; Samuel Hirshman; Aaron Kofner; Jodi L Liu; Andrew W Mulcahy; Ioana Popescu; Clare Stevens; Justin W Timbie; Peter S Hussey
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2015-07-15

4.  Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2016-11-04

5.  Maryland's all-payer approach to delivery-system reform.

Authors:  Rahul Rajkumar; Ankit Patel; Karen Murphy; John M Colmers; Jonathan D Blum; Patrick H Conway; Joshua M Sharfstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  CMS--engaging multiple payers in payment reform.

Authors:  Rahul Rajkumar; Patrick H Conway; Marilyn Tavenner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Will Bundled Payments Change Health Care? Examining the Evidence Thus Far in Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Terry Shih; Lena M Chen; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Centers for medicare and medicaid services: using an episode-based payment model to improve oncology care.

Authors:  Ronald M Kline; Carol Bazell; Erin Smith; Heidi Schumacher; Rahul Rajkumar; Patrick H Conway
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.840

  8 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Developing a Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework: Implications for Clinical Care, Research, and Policy.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Michelle A Mollica; Paul B Jacobsen; Deborah K Mayer; Lawrence N Shulman; Ann M Geiger
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Association of Participation in the Oncology Care Model With Medicare Payments, Utilization, Care Delivery, and Quality Outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Shalini Jhatakia; Gabriel A Brooks; Amanda S Tripp; Inna Cintina; Mary Beth Landrum; Qing Zheng; Thomas J Christian; Roberta Glass; Van Doren Hsu; Colleen M Kummet; Susannah Woodman; Carol Simon; Andrea Hassol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model Halfway Through: Perspectives from Diverse Participants.

Authors:  Ronald M Kline; Michelle Brown; Nikolas Buescher; John Cox; Elizabeth Horenkamp; Russell Hoverman; Marcus Neubauer; Randall Oyer; Anne Marie Fraley Rainey; Larisa Strawbridge
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Impact of psychiatric comorbidities on health care utilization and cost of care in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shehzad Niazi; Ryan D Frank; Mayank Sharma; Vivek Roy; Steve Ames; Teresa Rummans; Aaron Spaulding; Taimur Sher; Meghna Ailawadhi; Kirtipal Bhatia; Salman Ahmed; Winston Tan; Asher Chanan-Khan; Sikander Ailawadhi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-05-22

Review 5.  Establishing effective patient navigation programs in oncology.

Authors:  Diego Lopez; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Elizabeth A Rohan; Lisa Kennedy Sheldon; Karen Basen-Engquist; Ron Kline; Lawrence N Shulman; Efren J Flores
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Providers' mediating role for medication adherence among cancer survivors.

Authors:  Justin G Trogdon; Krutika Amin; Parul Gupta; Benjamin Y Urick; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Joel F Farley; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa Spees; Jennifer L Lund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Patient Navigation in Cancer: The Business Case to Support Clinical Needs.

Authors:  Ronald M Kline; Gabrielle B Rocque; Elizabeth A Rohan; Kris A Blackley; Cynthia A Cantril; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Howard A Burris; Lawrence N Shulman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Real-World Cost of Care for Commercially Insured versus Medicare Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Who Received Guideline-Recommended Therapies.

Authors:  Samantha Tomicki; Gabriela Dieguez; Helen Latimer; Paul Cockrum; George Kim
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2021-06

9.  Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices.

Authors:  Alex R Dopp; Suzanne E U Kerns; Laura Panattoni; Jeanne S Ringel; Daniel Eisenberg; Byron J Powell; Roger Low; Ramesh Raghavan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Cost-effectiveness of the Collaborative Care to Preserve Performance in Cancer (COPE) trial tele-rehabilitation interventions for patients with advanced cancers.

Authors:  Colleen F Longacre; John A Nyman; Sue L Visscher; Bijan J Borah; Andrea L Cheville
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.