Literature DB >> 28534614

Functional Nanoclay Suspension for Printing-Then-Solidification of Liquid Materials.

Yifei Jin1, Ashley Compaan1, Wenxuan Chai1, Yong Huang1.   

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the freeform fabrication of complex structures from various build materials. The objective of this study is to develop a novel Laponite nanoclay-enabled "printing-then-solidification" additive manufacturing approach to extrude complex three-dimensional (3D) structures made of various liquid build materials. Laponite, a member of the smectite mineral family, is investigated to serve as a yield-stress support bath material for the extrusion printing of liquid build materials. Using the printing-then-solidification approach, the printed structure remains liquid and retains its shape with the help of the Laponite support bath. Then the completed liquid structures are solidified in situ by applying suitable cross-linking mechanisms. Finally, the solidified structures are harvested from the Laponite nanoclay support bath for any further processing as needed. Due to its chemical and physical stability, liquid build materials with different solidification/curing/gelation mechanisms can be fabricated in the Laponite bath using the printing-then-solidification approach. The feasibility of the proposed Laponite-enabled printing-then-solidification approach is demonstrated by fabricating several complicated structures made of various liquid build materials, including alginate with ionic cross-linking, gelatin with thermal cross-linking, and SU-8 with photo-cross-linking. During gelatin structure printing, living cells are included and the postfabrication cell viability is above 90%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional nanoclay suspension; liquid build material; printing-then-solidification; three-dimensional printing; yield-stress support bath

Year:  2017        PMID: 28534614     DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b02398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  12 in total

Review 1.  2D Nanoclay for Biomedical Applications: Regenerative Medicine, Therapeutic Delivery, and Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Lauren M Cross; Charles W Peak; Karli Gold; James K Carrow; Anna Brokesh; Kanwar Abhay Singh
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 2.  Freeform 3D printing of soft matters: recent advances in technology for biomedical engineering.

Authors:  Shengyang Chen; Wen See Tan; Muhammad Aidil Bin Juhari; Qian Shi; Xue Shirley Cheng; Wai Lee Chan; Juha Song
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2020-09-29

3.  Study of sacrificial ink-assisted embedded printing for 3D perfusable channel creation for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Bing Ren; Kaidong Song; Anil Reddy Sanikommu; Yejun Chai; Matthew A Longmire; Wenxuan Chai; Walter Lee Murfee; Yong Huang
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 19.162

4.  Norbornene-functionalized methylcellulose as a thermo- and photo-responsive bioink.

Authors:  Min Hee Kim; Chien-Chi Lin
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.061

5.  3D freeform printing of silk fibroin.

Authors:  Maria J Rodriguez; Thomas A Dixon; Eliad Cohen; Wenwen Huang; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting.

Authors:  Liqun Ning; Carmen J Gil; Boeun Hwang; Andrea S Theus; Lilanni Perez; Martin L Tomov; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.162

Review 7.  The cell in the ink: Improving biofabrication by printing stem cells for skeletal regenerative medicine.

Authors:  G Cidonio; M Glinka; J I Dawson; R O C Oreffo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Printing bone in a gel: using nanocomposite bioink to print functionalised bone scaffolds.

Authors:  G Cidonio; M Cooke; M Glinka; J I Dawson; L Grover; R O C Oreffo
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2019-09

9.  Preparation and characterization of nanoclay-hydrogel composite support-bath for bioprinting of complex structures.

Authors:  Ferdows Afghah; Mine Altunbek; Caner Dikyol; Bahattin Koc
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Transparent support media for high resolution 3D printing of volumetric cell-containing ECM structures.

Authors:  Assaf Shapira; Nadav Noor; Hadas Oved; Tal Dvir
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.