Literature DB >> 28534009

Genomic Insight into Mechanisms of Reversion of Antibiotic Resistance in Multidrug Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Induced by a Nanomolecular Iodine-Containing Complex FS-1.

Aleksandr I Ilin1, Murat E Kulmanov1, Ilya S Korotetskiy1, Rinat A Islamov1, Gulshara K Akhmetova1, Marina V Lankina1, Oleg N Reva2.   

Abstract

Drug induced reversion of antibiotic resistance is a promising way to combat multidrug resistant infections. However, lacking knowledge of mechanisms of drug resistance reversion impedes employing this approach in medicinal therapies. Induction of antibiotic resistance reversion by a new anti-tuberculosis drug FS-1 has been reported. FS-1 was used in this work in combination with standard anti-tuberculosis antibiotics in an experiment on laboratory guinea pigs infected with an extensively drug resistant (XDR) strain Mycobacterium tuberculosis SCAID 187.0. During the experimental trial, genetic changes in the population were analyzed by sequencing of M. tuberculosis isolates followed by variant calling. In total 11 isolates obtained from different groups of infected animals at different stages of disease development and treatment were sequenced. It was found that despite the selective pressure of antibiotics, FS-1 caused a counter-selection of drug resistant variants that speeded up the recovery of the infected animals from XDR tuberculosis. Drug resistance mutations reported in the genome of the initial strain remained intact in more sensitive isolates obtained in this experiment. Variant calling in the sequenced genomes revealed that the drug resistance reversion could be associated with a general increase in genetic heterogeneity of the population of M. tuberculosis. Accumulation of mutations in PpsA and PpsE subunits of phenolpthiocerol polyketide synthase was observed in the isolates treated with FS-1 that may indicate an increase of persisting variants in the population. It was hypothesized that FS-1 caused an active counter-selection of drug resistant variants from the population by aggravating the cumulated fitness cost of the drug resistance mutations. Action of FS-1 on drug resistant bacteria exemplified the theoretically predicted induced synergy mechanism of drug resistance reversion. An experimental model to study the drug resistance reversion phenomenon is hereby introduced.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mycobacterium tuberculosis; drug resistance reversion; genome polymorphism; new drug; next generation sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28534009      PMCID: PMC5420568          DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol        ISSN: 2235-2988            Impact factor:   5.293


Introduction

The dilemma of acquired drug resistance by pathogenic bacteria is generally recognized (Tenover, 2001; Morens et al., 2004). This problem is complicated by a common crisis in development of new antibiotics (Spellberg et al., 2008; van den Boogaard et al., 2009; Piddock, 2012). Drug induced reversion of antibiotic resistance is a prospective approach to combat drug resistant infections. However, the mechanisms of this phenomenon are not understood and even the terminology has not been well defined. In early publications, this term referred to a suppression of antibiotic resistance proteins such as drug efflux pumps and/or beta-lactamases (Reading and Cole, 1977; Rodrigues et al., 2013). Another definition was given in a recent review by Baym et al. (2016), where this phenomenon was considered as an active drug induced counter-selection of resistant variants from populations of pathogens. Several theoretic clauses were discussed in the mentioned paper to explain the resistance reversion that occurred despite the presence of selective antibiotics. Drug induced over-burdening of the resistant strains by an aggravated fitness cost was considered as a possible mechanism. The fitness cost relates to adverse side effects of drug resistance mutations reducing the viability, adaptability, and growth rate of the mutants (Cohen et al., 2003; Gagneux et al., 2006). A mathematic model by Cohen and Murray (2004) has predicted that multidrug resistant pathogens would be rather unlikely to appear due to the cumulated fitness cost. Unfortunately, this prediction was rather over-optimistic. Subsequent compensatory mutations reduce the fitness cost to such a level that the population could retain the mutants for an extended period of time even after the withdrawal of the selective pressure of antibiotics (Pym et al., 2002; Luciani et al., 2009). However, the idea to aggravate the cumulated fitness cost by supplementary drugs in an effort to combat drug resistance still seems attractive. Tuberculosis remains one of the most dangerous threats to public health. This problem has been complicated by a wide distribution of drug resistant infections that basically brought about a return to the pre-antibiotic era (Cohn et al., 1997; Nouvel et al., 2006; Zager and McNerney, 2008). Multidrug resistant (MDR) tuberculosis pathogens were defined by the WHO as those resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin; and extensively drug resistant (XDR) variants being additionally resistant to fluoroquinalones and at least one second-line injectable antibiotics. Treatment of MDR and XDR tuberculosis requires an application of complex formulations of antibiotics (Iseman, 1993) that often cannot be administered due to life threatening side effects (Awofeso, 2008). Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is associated with spontaneous mutations in functional genomic loci. More than 1,000 putative drug resistance mutations have been predicted (Sandgren et al., 2009). Over the last 40 years, no new antibiotics against tuberculosis have been developed and only recently several new drugs have been proposed: Bedaquiline (Mahajan, 2013), Delamanid (Gupta et al., 2015) and FS-1 (Ilin and Kulmanov, 2014; Kalykova et al., 2016). However, resistance to Bedaquiline and Delamanid has already been reported (Hoffmann et al., 2016). FS-1 is an iodine-containing nanomolecular complex showing an antimicrobial effect (Kalykova et al., 2016). Active units of FS-1 are aggregated micelles containing complexes of triiodide molecules coordinated by metal ions and integrated into a dextrin-polypeptide moiety. The basic formula of the micelle is: where L–dextrin-polypeptide ligand; Me–Li/Mg ions; n, m, x, y, and k–variable integers ≥1; molecular mass of the micelles is in the range of 30–300 kD. In the blood plasma, the micelles bind to blood albumins. The mean residence time (MRT) of FS-1 estimated as a geometric average of the time of elimination of the drug from an organism (Cawello, 1999), was 24.6 h. Disintegration of the micelles causes a dissociation of triiodides into iodine molecules, which are the active antimicrobial agents of FS-1. FS-1 passed preclinical and clinical trials and in 2015 it was accepted as a new anti-MDR/XDR drug in Kazakhstan (Ilin and Kulmanov, 2014). FS-1 is of great interest for this study because of the reported antibiotic resistance reversion induced by this drug. It was hypothesized that FS-1 could influence the composition of bacterial populations by removal of the most resistant variants of M. tuberculosis, probably due to higher sensitivity to oxidative stresses (Cohen and Murray, 2004; Ilin et al., 2017). The aim of this work was to perform a laboratory experiment on animals infected with a XDR-TB strain to identify genetic changes in bacterial populations induced by FS-1. The strain M. tuberculosis SCAID 187.0 was used in this study. It was isolated from a patient with tuberculosis showing extensive drug resistance (Ilin et al., 2015). The present study proved the efficacy of the combinatorial treatment of infected animals by conventional anti-tuberculosis antibiotics supplemented with FS-1. An increased susceptibility to antibiotics was observed in M. tuberculosis isolates from the FS-1 treated animals. Sequencing of the isolates demonstrated that FS-1 caused recognizable changes in the M. tuberculosis populations by removal of the most resistant clonal lines, which were dominant in the untreated animals and in the animals treated solely by antibiotics. Reduction of the antibiotic resistance correlated with an increased genetic heterogeneity and accumulation of mutated variants of PpsA and truncated PpsE subunits of the phenolpthiocerol polyketide synthase.

Materials and methods

Isolation and identification of clinical cultures of M. tuberculosis

M. tuberculosis strains were isolated on a regular basis from patients' sputum samples during the combinatorial therapy of antibiotics and FS-1 (Ilin et al., 2017). Sputum samples were inoculated into liquid Löwenstein-Jensen medium (HiMedia Laboratories, India) and cultivated at 37°C for 8 weeks. Culture growth was controlled visually, by microscopy of Ziehl–Neelsen stained smears and by standard diagnostic biochemical tests including the positive catalase, niacin and nicotinamidase activities, negative Tween-80 hydrolysis and susceptibility to sodium salicylate (Segal and Bloch, 1956).

Minimal inhibitory concentration of FS-1

Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of FS-1 was tested on the type strain M. tuberculosis H37Rv and several clinical XDR isolates by serial dilution of FS-1 in liquid Löwenstein-Jensen medium with 1.75, 0.35, 0.175, 0.0875, 0.0437, 0.0218, and 0.0109 mg/ml of FS-1. Culture suspensions of 5 × 108 cells/ml were inoculated in aliquots of 0.2 ml into test tubes with 5 ml of the medium with FS-1 and without the compound for the positive growth control. Each concentration of FS-1 was triple replicated. Tubes were incubated for 10 days at 37°C.

Laboratory animals

In total, 105 healthy male and female 6–8 weeks old Hartley guinea pigs weighing 350–450 g were obtained from the Kazakh Scientific Research Veterinary Institute, Almaty, Kazakhstan. Animals were held under barrier conditions in a biosafety level III animal laboratory at 23 ± 2°C, humidity 50 ± 10%, on a 12 h light/dark cycle. All the animals received the standard forage (Ltd. Assortiment Agro, Russia) and deionized water consumed ad libitum. For blood collection and necropsy, the animals were sacrificed by an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (JSC KievMedPreparat, Ukraine). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Scientific Center for Anti-Infectious Drugs (no 29, 05.06.2014). Animal care complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 2010) and with the Kazakhstan governmental guidelines.

Infection and treatment of the animals by anti-tuberculosis antibiotics and FS-1

Guinea pigs were infected subcutaneously with 1 × 106 CFU/ml of the virulent strain M. tuberculosis SCAID 187.0. Bacterial suspensions were prepared ex tempore 2 h before infection from the bacterial culture cultivated for 10 days at 37°C on solid Löwenstein-Jensen medium. Development of tuberculosis in the animals was monitored weekly by changes in behavior, general appearance and body weight loss. On the 14th day after infection, three infected animals from the positive control group were sacrificed to confirm the infection state by necropsy and histopathological parameters. Anti-tuberculosis antibiotics were administrated starting on the 21st day after infection. Antibiotic dosage corresponded to the XDR-TB treatment regimen approved in Kazakhstan by the Ministry of Health. A combined formulation of 4–5 antibiotics is usually applied for XDR-TB treatment (Iseman, 1993). The complex of anti-tuberculosis antibiotics (CAA) included pyrazinamide (per os 100 mg/kg), cycloserine (per os 20.0 mg/kg), prothionamide (per os 20.0 mg/kg), capreomycin (intramuscular 20.0 mg/kg), and amikacin (intramuscular 50.0 mg/kg). FS-1 was administrated per os 30 min before CAA in doses of 2.5 and 4.0 mg/kg, which were respectively the therapeutic and maximal tolerable doses of the drug determined during the clinical trials (Kalykova et al., 2016). The treatment course lasted for 60 days. The animals were weighed daily and the dosage of the antibiotics and FS-1 were adjusted individually for every animal. The experimental design is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

The experimental design on laboratory animals (guinea pigs).

No.GroupTherapy14th day after infection (control of the infection state)Days of treatment starting from 21st day after infectionThe recovery group kept under surveillance for 30 days after the experiment
071421304560
Number of sacrificed animals
1Negative control (uninfected animals)No treatment33
2Positive control (infected animals)No treatment333333333
3Infected animalsCAA33333333
4Infected animalsCAA+FS-1 (2.5 mg/kg)33333333
5Infected animalsCAA+FS-1 (4.0 mg/kg)33333333
The experimental design on laboratory animals (guinea pigs).

Blood sampling and histological studies

Blood and tissue collections were performed for hematological, biochemical, microbiological and histological studies on the 14th and 21st days after the infection and on the 14th, 30th, 45th and 60th days of the treatment. Whole blood collection was performed by a cardiac puncture of the narcotized animals. Blood samples were placed in 1 ml Vacumed test tubes with K3-EDTA anticoagulant (FL Medical, Italy) and then analyzed by the Analyzer Human Humacount (Human GmbH, Germany). The remaining volumes of the blood samples were placed in 1.5 ml vials without anticoagulants and allowed to clot at room temperature for 60 min. The samples were then centrifuged at 1800 × g for 5 min. The serum was decanted and stored at −80°C prior to the analysis by Analyzer A25 (BioSystems Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd., India) to identify concentrations of the chemical compounds. The statistical reliability of observed differences was confirmed by Student's t-test. P-values smaller or equal to 0.05 were considered as significant.

Necropsy

Pieces of 10 × 20 mm were sampled in several repeats from the areas in-between necrolysis and intact tissues from lungs, livers, spleens, kidneys and thyroid glands of the sacrificed animals. The samples were fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde (Sigma, USA) buffered with PBS (Sigma, USA) at pH 7.0. Paraffin embedding and sectioning were performed by using the conventional methodology (Ross and Pawlina, 2006). Then the tissue samples were trimmed and processed by microscopic examination after staining with hematoxylin and eosin (Sigma, USA), Masson's trichrome and Van Gieson's stains (Bio Optica, Italy).

Isolation and storage of M. tuberculosis cultures from the infected animals

Tissue samples of approximately the same size (10 × 20 mm) were homogenized in sterilized laboratory mortars and re-suspended in 4 volumes of 6% sulphuric acid by shaking for 10 min at room temperature. The obtained suspension was left to precipitate and the supernatant fluid was removed. Deposited materials were washed out 3 times with 4 volumes of sterile saline (0.9% NaCl in distilled water) and the aliquots of 1 ml were inoculated onto solid Löwenstein-Jensen medium for further cultivation at 37°C for 8 weeks. Culture growth was controlled visually. Selected colonies (from 10 to 25 per group of isolates) were checked individually for susceptibility to antibiotics. The isolated cultures were frozen at −80°C in a protective medium (3% gelatin and 10% sucrose in water) and then lyophilized by ALPHA 1-2 LD-plus (Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Germany) for extended storage at −30°C.

Susceptibility to antibiotics

Susceptibility to all antibiotics but pyrazinamide was tested by growing the cultures for 4 weeks at 37°C in test-tubes on solid Löwenstein-Jensen medium supplemented with antibiotics in recommended concentrations (Krüüner et al., 2006). Medium pH was adjusted to 6.8. Susceptibility to pyrazinamide was tested on solid medium FAST-3L (BIOK, Russia) with pH adjusted to 5.0. The following antibiotics in μg/ml were used: isoniazid (0.2), rifampicin (40.0), streptomycin (4.0), pyrazinamide (200.0), ethambutol (2.0), amikacin (30.0), kanamycin (30.0), capreomycin (40.0), ofloxacin (2.0), cycloserine (40.0), and ethionamide (40.0). Percentages of drug resistant variants among M. tuberculosis isolates from different groups of infected animals were calculated. To compare the percentages of drug resistance in different groups, the standard error was calculated as the square root of [p × (1–p)] / n, where p, an average percentage of drug resistant isolates in a group; n, number of repeats of the experiment. Minimal inhibition concentrations (MIC) of the antibiotics were determined by the serial dilution method in a synthetic nutrient medium containing: KH2PO4—1.5 g/l, Na2HPO4—2.5 g/l, MgSO4× 7H2O—0.5 g/l, sodium citrate—1.5 g/l, ammonium iron (III) hydrocitrate—0.05 g/l, L-asparagine—0.1 g/l, glycerol—30 ml, sucrose—220 g/l, bovine serum (Sigma Aldrich)—100 ml/l and bacteriological agar (HiMedia Laboratories, India)—0.5 g/l. Antibiotics were dissolved in the medium to obtain the required serial dilutions. Then the diluted solutions of the antibiotics were dispensed by 700 μl per well into 48-well plates (BD Falcon, NU, USA). Each well was inoculated with 100 μl of ex tempore prepared suspensions of bacterial cells, 108 CFU/ml. Plates were incubated for 8 days at 37°C. Then aliquots of 100 μl of 0.05% (w/v) resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were added to each well and the plates were incubated for a further 24 h. Bacterial growth was detected by changes in the medium color from violet to pink. MIC values were identified in 3 repeats. Medium contamination with and without antibiotics and the growth of M. tuberculosis on the medium without antibiotics were controlled. The following serial dilutions of the antibiotics were used: isoniazid—0.35, 0.3, 0.25, 0.2, 0.15, 0.1, and 0.05 μg/ml; rifampicin—6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 μg/ml; streptomycin—6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 μg/ml; pyrazinamide—350, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, and 50 μg/ml; and ethionamide—17.5, 15.0, 12.5, 10.0, 7.5, 5.0, and 2.5 μg/ml.

DNA extraction, sequencing and comparison

DNA samples were extracted from the isolates by the Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Murray and Thompson, 1980). The eluted DNA was quantified using the Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Life Technologies, USA). In total, twelve DNA samples were prepared (Table 2) and sequenced by Macrogen (South Korea) using Illumina Hiseq 2000 paired-end technology.
Table 2

Sequencing of .

Experimental groupDay of isolation after beginning of the treatment and the sample codesNumber of generated paired-end DNA readsEMBL-EBI sample references
Clinical isolate of M. tuberculosis SCAID 187.0 used for infection of the animals36,366,100SAMEA4079245
Group 2, positive control (infected animals)30th day, sample 2_30_1610,546,455SAMEA4079234
45th day, sample 2_45_725,646,205SAMEA4079236
45th day, sample 2_45_3010,362,885SAMEA4079235
Group 3, animals treated with CAA30th day, sample 3_30_4627,488,724SAMEA4079237
60th day, sample 3_60_5110,290,171SAMEA4079238
Group 4, animals treated with CAA+FS-1 (2.5 mg/kg)30th day, sample 4_30_7510,463,777SAMEA4079239
60th day, sample 4_60_7620,571,859SAMEA4079240
60th day, sample 4_60_7710,091,644SAMEA4079241
Group 5, animals treated with CAA+FS-1 (4.0 mg/kg)30th day, sample 5_30_1049,987,928SAMEA4079242
60th day, sample 5_60_81.110,537,399SAMEA4079243
60th day, sample 5_60_81.219,905,283SAMEA4079244
Sequencing of . Variant calling was performed by aligning the DNA reads to the reference sequence SCAID 187.0 [CP012506] using CLC Genomics Workbench 7.0.3. Statistical validation of the identified variants was performed by the Quality based variant detection algorithm with the PHRED-type quality cut-off set to 20 for the central nucleotide residue and to 15 for five neighboring residues. Maximum of two gaps or mismatches were allowed per read.

Results

The experiment on laboratory animals was designed to simulate the clinical trial of FS-1 and induction of an antibiotic resistance reversion under the selective pressure of antibiotics. MIC of FS-1 was identified for the clinical isolate M. tuberculosis SCAID 187 during the first isolation and after 60 days of the combinatorial treatment by CAA+FS-1. Prior to the treatment, the determined MIC was 27.7 ± 2.4 μg/ml and after the treatment course the isolates from the same patients became even more sensitive to FS-1 with the MIC values 21.1 ± 2.0 μg/ml. This indicates that the application of FS-1 did not cause any resistance selection for the drug. An interesting observation was that the clinical XDR-TB isolate was even more sensitive to FS-1 than the drug sensitive type strain M. tuberculosis H37Rv (MIC was around 48 μg/ml). However, the hypothesis of a higher susceptibility of multidrug resistant variants has yet to be confirmed in an additional study with a greater number of isolates.

Drug resistance reversion induced in vitro by FS-1

It was found that the cultivation of the XDR strain SCAID 187.0 for 60 days in six passages on the medium with a sub-lethal dose of 12 μg/ml of FS-1 reversed the susceptibility of the bacteria to the tested antibiotics. MIC values determined for the cultures cultivated with FS-1 compared to the control condition (cultivated on the same medium without FS-1) are shown in Table 3 (see also Supplementary Figure 1). The values in Table 3 were confirmed in three replications of the experiment. More than two folds MIC reduction observed for rifampicin, ethionamide and pyrazinamide was considered as statistically reliable. These results cannot be attributed to any direct interaction between FS-1 and the antibiotics as the susceptibility was tested on the medium without FS-1. The increased susceptibility to the antibiotics may be explained by a counter-selection of the most resistant variants from the population.
Table 3

Drug resistance reversion induced .

AntibioticMIC (μg/ml) after 60 days of cultivation without FS-1MIC (μg/ml) after 60 days of cultivation with 12 μg/ml of FS-1
Isoniazid0.25 ± 0.050.2 ± 0.05
Rifampicin5.0 ± 1.01.0 ± 0.5
Streptomycin6.0 ± 1.04.0 ± 1.0
Pyrazinamide250 ± 50.0100 ± 50.0
Ethionamide12.5 ± 2.55 ± 2.5
Drug resistance reversion induced .

Combinatorial treatment of XDR-TB infected laboratory animals with antibiotics and FS-1

Miliary tuberculosis was diagnosed by necropsy of the sacrificed animals and by microscopy of histological sections. Granulomatous lungs, spleens and livers with multiple disseminated tubercles and significantly enlarged lymph nodes were observed (Supplementary Figure 2). Untreated animals died during the 60 days of the experiment. Contrary, the infected animals subjected to combinatorial treatment with FS-1 in doses of 2.5 and 4 mg/kg recovered from the disease. Fast recovery of these animals could even be seen by the positive body weight dynamics compared to the other groups of animals (Supplementary Table 1). The antibiotic therapy without FS-1 showed only a transient effect followed by a subsequent recurrence of the disease during the 30 days of the recovery period (Figure 1). Necropsy of the sacrificed animals and the results of the biochemical blood tests also confirmed the positive effect of FS-1 (Supplementary Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 2). In general, the biochemical blood test parameters in the groups treated by CAA+FS-1 corresponded to those in the intact animals of the negative control group (Supplementary Table 2). It was concluded that the hepatotoxicity of the anti-tuberculosis antibiotics was alleviated by FS-1 either by a direct action on hepatocytes, or by a faster removal of the tuberculosis infection. Differences revealed by these tests between the animals administrated with 2.5 and 4.0 mg/kg of FS-1 were statistically insignificant.
Figure 1

CFU titres in different groups of animals infected with the XDR . Average values are indicated and the bars depict standard deviations. (A) Group 2, positive control (untreated animals); (B) group 3 treated with CAA; (C) group 4 treated with CAA+FS-1 (2.5 mg/kg); (D) group 5 treated with CAA+FS-1 (4.0 mg/kg).

CFU titres in different groups of animals infected with the XDR . Average values are indicated and the bars depict standard deviations. (A) Group 2, positive control (untreated animals); (B) group 3 treated with CAA; (C) group 4 treated with CAA+FS-1 (2.5 mg/kg); (D) group 5 treated with CAA+FS-1 (4.0 mg/kg). M. tuberculosis isolates from the animals treated for 45 days by CAA+FS-1 showed an increased susceptibility to the antibiotics compared to the isolates from the positive control group and especially to those treated solely by CAA (Table 4). There was a clear trend of a dose dependent drug resistance reversion induced by FS-1 despite some variations between the isolates from different animals. Contrary, the treatment of the animals infected with XDR-TB solely by CAA caused a selection of more resistant variants.
Table 4

Percentage ranges of drug resistance among the isolates from the infected animals.

AntibioticsStock culture (%)Group 2, positive control (%)Group 3, CAA (%)Group 4, CAA+FS-1 (2.5 mg/kg) (%)Group 5, CAA+FS-1 (4.0 mg/kg) (%)
Isoniazid10010010075.0–83.375.0–80.0
Rifampicin10010010083.3–87.5*50.0–60.0
Streptomycin10010010010080.0–75.0
Pyrazinamide80.0–92.083.3100*33.3–37.5*20.0–25.0
Ethambutol88.0–10083.310066.7–75.075.0–80.0
Amikacin0.0–4.00.0*16.7–20.00.00.0
Kanamycin60.0–80.066.7–83.383.3–90.050.0*20.0–25.0
Capreomycin48.0–60.033.3–66.780.0–83.362.5–66.750.0–60.0
Ofloxacin56.0–60.066.733.30.0–12.550.0–60.0
Cycloserine16.0–20.033.366.7–70.00.0–25.00.0
Ethionamide60.0–72.050.083.3–90.00.0–12.5*0.0

Every condition was repeated in triplicate and the minimal and maximal percentages of drug resistant isolates (if different) are shown.

The difference in the percentage of drug resistant variants in this group compared to the positive control group 2 is statistically reliable with p-value ≤ 0.05.

Percentage ranges of drug resistance among the isolates from the infected animals. Every condition was repeated in triplicate and the minimal and maximal percentages of drug resistant isolates (if different) are shown. The difference in the percentage of drug resistant variants in this group compared to the positive control group 2 is statistically reliable with p-value ≤ 0.05.

Comparison of genome sequences of M. tuberculosis isolates

Eight drug resistance mutations listed in Table 5 were found in the reference genome M. tuberculosis SCAID 187.0 (CP012506). All of them remained unchanged in the isolates showing reduced drug resistance (Table 4). This finding was consistent with the results of sequencing of a series of clinical isolates obtained during the clinical trial of FS-1 (Ilin et al., 2017). Variant calling in the experimental isolates revealed 30 polymorphic sites, which were found in at least two isolates per group with the frequency of minor alleles above 1% and a read coverage above 10 (Table 6). Only two polymorphic loci were present in the isolates from the animals treated solely by CAA. This indicates a purifying selection caused by the antibiotics. Fifteen polymorphic loci were discovered in the isolates from the untreated animals. M. tuberculosis isolates from the animals treated by CAA+FS-1 showed the highest genetic heterogeneity with 20 and 26 identified polymorphic loci in groups 4 and 5, respectively. Almost all polymorphic loci were in hyper-variable PPE-PGRS genes. However, the treatment of the animals with FS-1 caused an accumulation of mutations in subunits A and E of the phenolpthiocerol synthase. One mutation causing a P-to-H substitution in a proline rich linker region between the acyltransferase and dehydratase domains was characteristic for 37–38% of the DNA reads generated from the isolates of groups 4 and 5. A frameshift mutation caused by an insertion of 2 nucleotides in the mid part of the ppsE subunit was found in 95% of the reads generated from the isolates on the 30th day of the treatment by CAA + 4.0 mg/kg FS-1. In the M. tuberculosis cultures isolated from animals in this group on the 60th day of the treatment the percentage of this mutation lowered to 50%. These mutations in ppsA and ppsE were not found in the initial strain SCAID 187.0 or in the isolates from the other groups of animals.
Table 5

Canonical drug resistance mutations found in the genome of the strain .

GeneLocation in CP012506CodonDNA locusAmino acid substitution*Associated resistance
Rv0006, gyrA7,58595AGC/ACCSer→ThrFluoroquinolones (Kapur et al., 1999)
Rv0682, rpsL781,68743AAG/AGGLys→ArgStreptomycin (Finken et al., 1993)
Rv1908c, katG2,155,168315AGC/ACCSer→ThrPutative isoniazid resistance
Rv1908c, katG2,154,724463CGG/CTGArg→LeuIsoniazid (Heym et al., 1995)
Rv2043c, pncA2,288,747141CAG/CCGGln→ProPyrazinamide (Scorpio and Zhang, 1996)
Rv2247, accD62,521,428229GAC/GGCAsp→GlyIsoniazid (Ramaswamy et al., 2003)
Rv3795, embB4,247,431306TGG/TTGMet→IleEthambutol (Sreevatsan et al., 1997)
Rv3919, gidB4,407,92792ACC/AACGlu→AspStreptomycin (Okamoto et al., 2007)

In pairs of amino acid substitutions the residue to the left is the state in the type strain H37Rv (drug sensitive) and the residue to the right is the state in the MDR strain SCAID 187.0.

Table 6

Genomic polymorphisms in .

LocusAnnotationLocation*Type of polymorphismNucleotide substitutionPercentage of mutations in different groups of Mtb isolates
Group 2 (positive control)Group 3 (CAA)Group 4 (CAA+2.5 mg/kg FS-1)Group 5 (CAA+4.0 mg/kg FS-1)
AFL40_0134Type V PE-PGRS2 protein; similar to Rv0124148907SNV G/DG/A96.67 ± 3.33
AFL40_0295Type V PE-PGRS3 protein; similar to Rv0278c; involved in virulence, detoxification, adaptation332900SNV A/TC/T100100100
334374SNVC/T100
AFL40_0296Type V PE-PGRS4 protein; similar to Rv0279c336824SNVA/G62.51 ± 3.6956.11 ± 5.0859.79 ± 1.46
336827SNVC/G61.68 ± 1.4856.69 ± 6.6957.28 ± 0.94
336845SNVC/G67.4 ± 4.8970.57 ± 1.16
AFL40_1822Type V PPE24 protein; similar to Rv1753c1972684SNV P/AG/C100100100
1972687SNV P/AG/C100100100
AFL40_1946Hypothetical protein; similar to Rv1883c2116184SNV V/AA/G55.63 ± 0.6662.18 ± 1.151.07 ± 7.1758.80 ± 2.37
AFL40_1980aPutative PPE family protein2146279SNV N/DT/C39.80 ± 1.9339.84 ± 0.0340.57 ± 1.9146.59 ± 2.07
Non-codingPossible promoter of peptidase Rv2141c2397748SNVT/C38.62 ± 0.2337.45 ± 0.09
AFL40_2592Type V PE_PGRS43 protein; similar to Rv2490c2800107SNVA/C44.89 ± 8.05
AFL40_3034Phenolpthiocerol synthesis type-I polyketide synthase; similar to Rv29313237781SNV P/HC/A37.59 ± 1.8838.66 ± 1.88
AFL40_3038Phenolpthiocerol synthesis type-I polyketide synthase PpsE; similar to Rv29353259526–3259527INS frameshiftdel/GT63.71 ± 22.1
AFL40_3247Type IV PPE51 protein; similar to Rv3136; involved in cell wall processes3494584SNVG/A99.71 ± 0.41100100
AFL40_3271Putative PPE family protein3521259–3521261DEL A/delCGC/del66.56 ± 6.2363.91 ± 4.8462.19 ± 2.46
Non-codingSpacer region between Rv3401 and Rv3402c3821160SNVG/A81.12 ± 1.9583.54 ± 1.7183.12 ± 1.92
Non-codingSpacer region between Rv3401 and Rv3402c3821198–3821199DELCA/del36.4 ± 1.1
Non-codingSpacer region between Rv3401 and Rv3402c3821241SNVA/G79.37 ± 1.9780.48 ± 1.584.87 ± 0.56
AFL40_3563hypothetical protein3849170SNVC/T63.20 ± 1.7354.89 ± 4.8958.89 ± 2.89
AFL40_3645Type V PE_PGRS53 protein; similar to Rv35073930499SNVC/T100100
AFL40_3651Type V PE_PGRS55 protein; similar to Rv35113944852SNVC/T92.5 ± 7.5100
3944859–3944860MNV T/DAC/GA83.33 ± 16.6
3944865–3944866INS frameshiftdel/T49.26 ± 3.11
3944872DEL frameshift or together with the previous INS: AR/VGC/del49.39 ± 3.94
3944866SNV G/AG/C47.02 ± 5.35
3944875SNV V/AG/C41.42 ± 0.24
3944878SNV D/GA/G56.06 ± 10.6
3944885DEL frameshiftA/del44.84 ± 8.48
3944888–3944889INS frameshift or together with the previous DEL: Q/Ndel/T39.23 ± 2.87
AFL40_3653Type V PE_PGRS61 protein; similar to Rv35083949371–3949372MNV G/AGG/CA68.48 ± 18.480.16 ± 12.1
Number of polymorphisms per genome:1522026

Locations are given as in the reference genome SCAID 187.0 [CP012506];

Types of polymorphisms are: SNV, single nucleotide polymorphism; MNV, multiple nucleotide polymorphism; INS, insertion; DEL, deletion. In the case of sense nucleotide substitutions, the corresponding amino acid substitutions are shown.

Canonical drug resistance mutations found in the genome of the strain . In pairs of amino acid substitutions the residue to the left is the state in the type strain H37Rv (drug sensitive) and the residue to the right is the state in the MDR strain SCAID 187.0. Genomic polymorphisms in . Locations are given as in the reference genome SCAID 187.0 [CP012506]; Types of polymorphisms are: SNV, single nucleotide polymorphism; MNV, multiple nucleotide polymorphism; INS, insertion; DEL, deletion. In the case of sense nucleotide substitutions, the corresponding amino acid substitutions are shown.

Discussion

The experiment on laboratory animals confirmed the therapeutic effect of FS-1 administrated in combination with the antibiotics of the standard regiment. It was hypothesized that the induced drug resistance reversion presumably contributed to the therapeutic effect by FS-1. Remarkably, the drug resistance reversion was demonstrated also in vitro where no direct interaction between FS-1 and the antibiotics was possible. There are evidences that FS-1 can cause a counter-selection of the drug resistant variants of M. tuberculosis (Ilin et al., 2017). Sequencing of the isolates obtained from different groups of animals revealed dissimilar frequencies and allelic states of genomic polymorphisms. Selection of the resistant clonal lines was caused by the CAA treatment. Contrary, no resistance selection was observed in the M. tuberculosis isolates from the animals threated by CAA+FS-1. The combinatorial therapy led to a complete sanitation of the infected animals from Mycobacterial bacilli in 45–60 days of the treatment (Figure 1) which was also confirmed by the blood test results and necropsy (Supplementary Figures 2–3, Supplementary Tables 1–2). M. tuberculosis isolates obtained during the combinatorial treatment showed an increased susceptibility to antibiotics (Table 4) associated with an increased level of genetic heterogeneity (Table 6). However, all the “canonical” drug resistance mutations identified in the initial strain M. tuberculosis SCAID 187.0 (Table 5) remained intact in the isolates despite the increased susceptibility. This suggests that the known antibiotic resistance mutations might not be sufficient to produce sustainable drug resistance which requires the presence of a specific genetic context rendered by other polymorphic genes. Majority of the polymorphic loci were located in hyper-variable PPE-PGRS genes. These genes are three fold more mutable than the average. It was hypothesized that their major role was an antigenic redress of bacterial cells (Banu et al., 2002). Several additional functions of PPE-PGRS proteins were proposed in a recent publication by Fishbein et al. (2015). Selection of PPE-PGRS mutants was also observed in M. tuberculosis cultures grown in human macrophages (Guerrini et al., 2016). However, it should also be considered that these mutations could just be genetic markers of different competing clonal lines in the population, which differ in gene transcription or DNA methylation patterns (Heusipp et al., 2007). CAA+FS-1 treatment of the infected animals caused an accumulation of disruptive mutations in ppsE and ppsA. A similar result was obtained recently by sequencing a series of TB isolates from patients treated with FS-1 during clinical trials (Ilin et al., 2017). This polyketide synthase operon encodes synthesis of a methyl-branched fatty acid phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM) that is a characteristic cell wall compound of Mycobacteria (Azad et al., 1997; Camacho et al., 2001). PDIM has been proven to be an important virulence factor (Yu et al., 2012). However, other authors noted that impairing of the PDIM biosynthesis improved the persistence ability of the pathogens (Torrey et al., 2016). Variations in the PDIM operon may allow finding a compromise between pathogenicity, viability and ability to persist. An interesting observation was that the frequency of the frameshift mutations in ppsE reached the 95% maximum after 30 days of the treatment by CAA + 4 mg/kg FS-1, but then decreased to 50% implying that the persistent variants did not overcome the continuous treatment by FS-1. The observed increase in the genetic heterogeneity of the isolates under influence of FS-1 may indicate an accumulation of random mutations causing a general metabolic retardation. Indeed, on average it took longer to mature the isolates on the late stages of the treatment with FS-1; however, the growth rate results were inconsistent. Such strains could persist for longer in the treated animals without being able to maintain the infection, while in the animals treated solely by CAA the selected drug resistant variants caused recurrences of the disease (Figure 1). Counter-selection of the drug resistant variants from the population may be associated with the fitness cost aggravation by FS-1 (Ilin et al., 2017). It was reported that the drug resistant mutants were more sensitive to oxidative stress (Cohen and Murray, 2004). Under the combinatorial action of the antibiotics and FS-1, the XDR-TB population failed to find genetic variants fitting both selective pressures. Late isolates appeared to be more susceptible to the antibiotics and to FS-1. To the best of our knowledge, this work was the first experimental model to study the drug induced antibiotic resistance reversion by the induced synergy mechanism that had been predicted theoretically in a recent publication (Baym et al., 2016). Application of drug resistance reversion induced in clinics may allow reducing the frequency of side effect complications by shortening the treatment course of the standard antibiotics and it will improve the efficacy of curing of XDR-TB infection that currently is below a 20% success rate (Pietersen et al., 2014).

Author contributions

AI and MK planning of experiments and general managements; RI, GA, and ML work with M. tuberculosis isolates, biochemical experiments; RI work with laboratory animals; IK extraction of DNA and sequencing; OR bioinformatics support; AI, RI, ML, and OR preparation and edition of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the grant 0115PK00389 provided by the Ministry for investments and development of Kazakhstan. Bioinformatic analysis was funded by the grant #93664 provided for ONR by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Development and spread of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents: an overview.

Authors:  F C Tenover
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: critical role of embB mutations.

Authors:  S Sreevatsan; K E Stockbauer; X Pan; B N Kreiswirth; S L Moghazeh; W R Jacobs; A Telenti; J M Musser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Clavulanic acid: a beta-lactamase-inhiting beta-lactam from Streptomyces clavuligerus.

Authors:  C Reading; M Cole
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The competitive cost of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Sebastien Gagneux; Clara Davis Long; Peter M Small; Tran Van; Gary K Schoolnik; Brendan J M Bohannan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  M D Iseman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-09       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Are the PE-PGRS proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis variable surface antigens?

Authors:  Sayera Banu; Nadine Honoré; Brigitte Saint-Joanis; Dana Philpott; Marie-Christine Prévost; Stewart T Cole
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  Long-term outcomes of patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: a cohort study.

Authors:  Elize Pietersen; Elisa Ignatius; Elizabeth M Streicher; Barbara Mastrapa; Xavier Padanilam; Anil Pooran; Motasim Badri; Maia Lesosky; Paul van Helden; Frederick A Sirgel; Robin Warren; Keertan Dheda
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Delamanid and Bedaquiline Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ancestral Beijing Genotype Causing Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in a Tibetan Refugee.

Authors:  Harald Hoffmann; Thomas A Kohl; Sabine Hofmann-Thiel; Matthias Merker; Patrick Beckert; Katia Jaton; Lubov Nedialkova; Evgeni Sahalchyk; Thomas Rothe; Peter M Keller; Stefan Niemann
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ellen M Zager; Ruth McNerney
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 10.  The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases.

Authors:  David M Morens; Gregory K Folkers; Anthony S Fauci
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparative fitness analysis of D-cycloserine resistant mutants reveals both fitness-neutral and high-fitness cost genotypes.

Authors:  Dimitrios Evangelopoulos; Gareth A Prosser; Angela Rodgers; Belinda M Dagg; Bhagwati Khatri; Mei Mei Ho; Maximiliano G Gutierrez; Teresa Cortes; Luiz Pedro S de Carvalho
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Novel Mutations in Putative Nicotinic Acid Phosphoribosyltransferases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Their Effect on Protein Thermodynamic Properties.

Authors:  Yu-Juan Zhang; Muhammad Tahir Khan; Madeeha Shahzad Lodhi; Hadba Al-Amrah; Salma Saleh Alrdahe; Hanan Ali Alatawi; Doaa Bahaa Eldin Darwish
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Prediction of drug resistance by Sanger sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains isolated from multidrug resistant tuberculosis suspect patients in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Eyob Abera Mesfin; Matthias Merker; Dereje Beyene; Abreham Tesfaye; Yassir Adam Shuaib; Desalegn Addise; Belay Tessema; Stefan Niemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  The Effect of Iodine-Containing Nano-Micelles, FS-1, on Antibiotic Resistance, Gene Expression and Epigenetic Modifications in the Genome of Multidrug Resistant MRSA Strain Staphylococcus aureus ATCC BAA-39.

Authors:  Oleg N Reva; Ilya S Korotetskiy; Monique Joubert; Sergey V Shilov; Ardak B Jumagaziyeva; Natalya A Suldina; Alexandr I Ilin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  MmpL3 Inhibition: A New Approach to Treat Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections.

Authors:  Jigar P Sethiya; Melanie A Sowards; Mary Jackson; Elton Jeffrey North
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.