| Literature DB >> 28533635 |
Anitha Dharmalingam1, Shwetal U Pawar1, Sandesh V Parelkar2, Suruchi S Shetye1, Mangala K Ghorpade1, Gundu H Tilve1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The differential cortical function obtained by Tc-99m EC is comparable to that of Tc-99m DMSA. However, identification of scars on Tc-99m EC images needs to be studied. AIMS: The aim of the study is to evaluate role of Tc-99m EC for detection of scarring and differential cortical function by comparing with Tc-99m DMSA. SETTINGS ANDEntities:
Keywords: As the differential renal function and cortical scarring detected using Tc-99m EC is comparable to the gold standard of Tc-99m DMSA; Tc-99m EC can be used as a single modality for obtaining multiple information reducing time, cost, and radiation exposure to the child.; DMSA; EC; UTI; cortical scarring; differential renal function
Year: 2017 PMID: 28533635 PMCID: PMC5439197 DOI: 10.4103/0972-3919.202240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Nucl Med ISSN: 0974-0244
Figure 1(a) Division of the renal cortex in upper, median, and lower segments, (b) segments drawn on the Tc-99m EC cortical phase image, (c) comparison with Tc-99m DMSA in the 128 × 128 image matrix size, (d) and Tc-99m DMSA in the 256 × 256 image matrix size. There are no cortical scarring bilaterally with normal contour and DRF
Figure 2Comparison of scars using Tc-99m EC, Tc-99m DMSA 128 × 128 image matrix size, and Tc-99m DMSA 256 × 256 image matrix size: ≤ 50% scar at the upper pole of the right kidney (a, b, c red arrow), detection of multiple ≤50% and >50% size scars bilaterally (d, e, f), and identification of large scar involving entire right kidney (g, h, i blue arrow)
Comparison of detection of scarring in the image of two matrix sizes of Tc-99m DMSA
Comparison of delineation of contour by Tc-99m EC and Tc-99m DMSA
Comparison between Tc-99m EC and Tc-99m DMSA for identification of cortical scarring
Figure 3ROC curves for agreement between two independent observers for identification of scarring: upper segment (a), median segment (b), and lower segment (c) on the 128 × 128 image matrix size of Tc-99m EC and Tc-99m DMSA and upper segment (d), median segment (e), and lower segment (f) on Tc-99m DMSA (128 × 128) and Tc-99m DMSA (256 × 256)
Comparison between Tc-99m EC and Tc-99m DMSA for DRF