Literature DB >> 28533373

Mental models accurately predict emotion transitions.

Mark A Thornton1, Diana I Tamir2.   

Abstract

Successful social interactions depend on people's ability to predict others' future actions and emotions. People possess many mechanisms for perceiving others' current emotional states, but how might they use this information to predict others' future states? We hypothesized that people might capitalize on an overlooked aspect of affective experience: current emotions predict future emotions. By attending to regularities in emotion transitions, perceivers might develop accurate mental models of others' emotional dynamics. People could then use these mental models of emotion transitions to predict others' future emotions from currently observable emotions. To test this hypothesis, studies 1-3 used data from three extant experience-sampling datasets to establish the actual rates of emotional transitions. We then collected three parallel datasets in which participants rated the transition likelihoods between the same set of emotions. Participants' ratings of emotion transitions predicted others' experienced transitional likelihoods with high accuracy. Study 4 demonstrated that four conceptual dimensions of mental state representation-valence, social impact, rationality, and human mind-inform participants' mental models. Study 5 used 2 million emotion reports on the Experience Project to replicate both of these findings: again people reported accurate models of emotion transitions, and these models were informed by the same four conceptual dimensions. Importantly, neither these conceptual dimensions nor holistic similarity could fully explain participants' accuracy, suggesting that their mental models contain accurate information about emotion dynamics above and beyond what might be predicted by static emotion knowledge alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emotion; experience-sampling; social cognition; theory of mind

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28533373      PMCID: PMC5468631          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616056114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Neural evidence that three dimensions organize mental state representation: Rationality, social impact, and valence.

Authors:  Diana I Tamir; Mark A Thornton; Juan Manuel Contreras; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Strategies for social inference: a similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates.

Authors:  Daniel R Ames
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-11

3.  Consequences of specific processing of emotional information: Impact of general versus specific autobiographical memory priming on emotion elicitation.

Authors:  Pierre Philippot; Alexandre Schaefer; Gwenola Herbette
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2003-09

Review 4.  State-space models of individual animal movement.

Authors:  Toby A Patterson; Len Thomas; Chris Wilcox; Otso Ovaskainen; Jason Matthiopoulos
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  It takes two: the interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy.

Authors:  Jamil Zaki; Niall Bolger; Kevin Ochsner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

6.  A hierarchical latent stochastic differential equation model for affective dynamics.

Authors:  Zita Oravecz; Francis Tuerlinckx; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-08-08

Review 7.  The Socio-Temporal Brain: Connecting People in Time.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Warren H Meck; Trevor B Penney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Anchoring and adjustment during social inferences.

Authors:  Diana I Tamir; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-04-16

9.  Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.

Authors:  Nicholas Epley; Boaz Keysar; Leaf Van Boven; Thomas Gilovich
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-09

10.  Unpacking the informational bases of empathic accuracy.

Authors:  Jamil Zaki; Niall Bolger; Kevin Ochsner
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-08
View more
  15 in total

1.  Words are a context for mental inference.

Authors:  Nicole Betz; Katie Hoemann; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-01-10

Review 2.  Modeling the Predictive Social Mind.

Authors:  Diana I Tamir; Mark A Thornton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Trait knowledge forms a common structure across social cognition.

Authors:  Ryan M Stolier; Eric Hehman; Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-01-13

4.  Six dimensions describe action understanding: The ACT-FASTaxonomy.

Authors:  Mark A Thornton; Diana I Tamir
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2021-09-30

5.  The 3d Mind Model characterizes how people understand mental states across modern and historical cultures.

Authors:  Mark A Thornton; Sarah Wolf; Brian J Reilly; Edward G Slingerland; Diana I Tamir
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2022-01-22

6.  Default and control network connectivity dynamics track the stream of affect at multiple timescales.

Authors:  Giada Lettieri; Giacomo Handjaras; Francesca Setti; Elisa Morgana Cappello; Valentina Bruno; Matteo Diano; Andrea Leo; Emiliano Ricciardi; Pietro Pietrini; Luca Cecchetti
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.235

7.  People represent mental states in terms of rationality, social impact, and valence: Validating the 3d Mind Model.

Authors:  Mark A Thornton; Diana I Tamir
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  The Social Brain Automatically Predicts Others' Future Mental States.

Authors:  Mark A Thornton; Miriam E Weaverdyck; Diana I Tamir
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  People accurately predict the transition probabilities between actions.

Authors:  Mark A Thornton; Diana I Tamir
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 10.  Resolving uncertainty in a social world.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; Amitai Shenhav
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.