Literature DB >> 28532740

Reduced Intellectual Ability in Offspring of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Cohort Study.

Gu-Feng Xu1, Cheng-Liang Zhou1, Yi-Meng Xiong2, Jing-Yi Li1, Tian-Tian Yu2, Shen Tian3, Xian-Hua Lin2, Yun Liao4, Yuan Lv4, Fang-Hong Zhang4, Zhi-Wei Liu2, Yin-Yin Shi2, Yan Shen2, Jin Sha2, Dan Zhang1, Yi-Min Zhu4, Jian-Zhong Sheng5, He-Feng Huang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), a complication of ovarian stimulation, has various adverse effects on both pregnant women and their offspring. However, whether OHSS will affect intellectual ability in offspring is still unknown.
METHODS: We recruited 86 Chinese children born to OHSS women and 172 children conceived with non-OHSS In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in this cohort study. Their intellectual ability was assessed according to the Revised Chinese Version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (C-WISC). Verbal Intelligence Quotient (VIQ), Performance Intelligence Quotient (PIQ), and Full Intelligence Quotient (FIQ) were calculated. The investigation was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-SOC-16009555).
FINDINGS: OHSS offspring scored less on C-WISC (mean (standard deviation [SD]): (VIQ=92.7 (14.7), PIQ=108.9 (13.1), FIQ=100.6 (13.4)) compared with non-OHSS IVF offspring (VIQ=100.1 (13.2), PIQ=113.7 (10.8), FIQ=107.4 (11.5)). The prevalence of low IQ (<80) children was 4.7 times higher in OHSS offspring compared with non-OHSS offspring. Maternal estradiol level on hCG administration day was negatively associated with FIQ in offspring.
INTERPRETATION: OHSS offspring displayed reduced intellectual ability. Prenatal estradiol exposure might be involved in underlying mechanism.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technologies; Estradiol; Intelligence quotient; Offspring; Ovarian stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28532740      PMCID: PMC5478241          DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EBioMedicine        ISSN: 2352-3964            Impact factor:   8.143


Introduction

The long-term safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) - related offspring always draws attention. Most of previous studies reported generally normal intellectual ability in ARTs toddlers, preschoolers, and children in middle childhood (Bay et al., 2013). In contrast, some studies found that ARTs children scored lower in intellectual tests (Knoester et al., 2008, Zhu et al., 2009, Sutcliffe et al., 2001). Ovarian over-response to ovarian stimulation during ARTs leads to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The prevalence of moderate or severe OHSS varies from 0.5% to 6% in different studies (Delvigne and Rozenberg, 2002). OHSS is characterized by elevated estradiol level, cystic ovarian enlargement, and fluid shift from the intravascular compartment into the peritoneal, pleural or pericardial cavities during the first trimester (Nastri et al., 2010). Since ovarian stimulation and ARTs have been widely performed (1% to 4% of births in developed countries) (Sutcliffe and Ludwig, 2007), more children are born under the potential jeopardy of ovarian hyperstimulation. Offspring of OHSS or ARTs displayed abnormality in several aspects. ARTs are associated with higher risks of low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age birth (Hu et al., 2014). Offspring after exposure to high estradiol environment in ARTs displayed altered thyroid hormone profile (Lv et al., 2014). The OHSS offspring displayed cardiovascular dysfunction (Xu et al., 2014). A recent study published on JAMA showed that cardiovascular risk factors were associated with dementia in adults {Gottesman, 2017 #1757}. Although the population in our study were much younger, we were curious to know whether intellectual outcomes of OHSS children were affected. Therefore, we performed intellectual evaluation on OHSS children to study the potential harm of OHSS in early intellectual development.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

Reproductive information of patients who underwent in-vitro fertilization (IVF) at reproductive center, women's hospital, Zhejiang University was extract from inpatient database. Eligible women were those underwent IVF and suffered from severe OHSS between Jan 2005 and Dec 2007. Exclusion criteria were: data missed in database, age over 40 or age of husband over 40 at the time of IVF, either of the couple smoked or abused alcohol (> 14 drinks/weeks for women and > 21 drinks/week for men) within 3 months before IVF, abortion, fetal loss, stillbirth, neonatal death or fetal major congenital malformations. After exclusion, 106 OHSS women were invited to participate in the study. A total of 86 women agreed to participate and 99 children completed the IQ tests. We created a 1:2 matched control cohort comprising IVF women without OHSS (non-OHSS IVF) and their children. The matching factors were multiple birth, gestational age (within one week), birth weight (within 100 g) and age of children (within 6 months). If a woman in control group refused to participate, we invited another matched woman to ensure the 1:2 ratio. To prevent the correlation between twins, we included only one twin from each pair of twins. An online randomization tool (www.randomizer.org) was used to select the twin from OHSS group (www.randomizer.org), and matched them with children from non-OHSS IVF group. Eighty six children of OHSS group and 172 children of non-OHSS group were included in final analysis. (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Study design.

Study design. OHSS was diagnosed and classified according to Golan and Wasserman's 2009 criteria (Golan and Weissman, 2009). Briefly, if one of the following 3 criteria is met, the women can be diagnosed as severe OHSS: 1) clinical evidence of ascites or hydrothorax or breathing difficulties, 2) depletion in blood volume and haemoconcentration, 3) severe complications such as renal failure, thromboembolism and acute respiratory distress syndrome. All OHSS cases were fresh embryo transfer IVF. The women were contacted by telephone. Parental, delivery and ARTs characteristics were collected through parental interview and review of medical records. Height and weight of children were measured during the interview. Parental education level was classified as: low (middle school or below), middle (high school), and high (college or above). Primary infertility is defined as the inability to ever become pregnant after at least one year of having sex and not using birth control methods. Secondary infertility is defined as the inability to become pregnant after at least one year having sex without using birth control methods, following the birth of one or more biological children. The Ethics Committee of Women Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University approved the study. Written informed consents were obtained from the parents of these children. The investigation was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-SOC-16009555).

Evaluation of Intellectual Ability

The intellectual ability was assessed according to the Chinese Version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (C-WISC) (Yu et al., 2012). All children completed 10 individual subtests, including 5 verbal tests and 5 performance tests. The verbal tests includes Arithmetic (A), Comprehension (C), Information (I), Sorting (S) and Vocabulary (V), and the performance tests includes Animal Pegs (AP), Block Design (BD), Mazes (MA), Object Assembly (OA) and Picture Completion (PC). After the intelligence subtests, the raw score from each subtest was transformed into a scaled score and the following 3 intelligence quotients (IQs) were calculated: Verbal Intelligence Quotient (VIQ, transformed from the sum of scaled verbal scores), Performance Intelligence Quotient (PIQ, transformed from the sum of scaled performance scores), and Full Intelligence Quotient (FIQ, transformed from the total sum of scaled scores). The score was standardized based on a sample of 3320 Chinese children, comprising multiple age groups, districts and parental education levels. All intelligence tests were administered by trained professionals who were blinded to the study grouping.

Statistical Analysis

Data obtained from intelligence tests were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 (IBM, USA). We compared continuous variables using Student's t-test or ANOVA with Turkey post-hoc analysis. Categorical variables were compared by using two-tailed Chi-square tests, or Fisher's exact test. FIQ, VIQ and PIQ were expressed as mean (standard deviation [SD]). The mean differences were adjusted to control for certain confounders according to different models with linear regression model. Model 1 adjusted for child age, gestational age, birth weight, maternal age, nulliparous, maternal PCOS, maternal education, paternal age, paternal education, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, apgar score < 7, and respiratory distress syndrome. Model 2 additional adjusted for maternal estradiol level on hCG administration day. All reported P values are two-sided. Power calculation was performed before the study on the basis of our previously reported IQs of IVF children (Xing et al., 2014). Considering score difference of 5 in FIQ between OHSS and non-OHSS IVF subjects (SD = 10; power > 0.9; α = 0.05; sampling ratio = 2), 63 OHSS cases and 126 non-OHSS IVF cases were required.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The age, gender, height, weight, BMI, gestational complications, and delivery data were similar between non-OHSS IVF and OHSS groups (Table 1). Maternal and paternal data were similar between two groups except for serum estradiol level on hCG administration day (Table 2).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of children and prenatal outcomes.

CharacteristicNon-OHSS IVF (N = 172)OHSS (N = 86)P value
Age, yr4.97 (0.14)4.95 (0.53)NA
Male, N (%)90 (52.3)41 (47.7)0.481
Height, cm111.6 (4.3)110.6 (5.0)0.116
Weight, kg19.0 (2.5)18.6 (2.7)0.238
BMI, kg/m215.2 (1.5)15.1 (1.3)0.708
Gestational complications
 Gestational diabetes30 (19.8)13 (15.1)0.636
 Preeclampsia9 (5.2)7 (8.1)0.361
 Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy13 (7.6)7 (8.1)0.869
Delivery data
 Gestational age at delivery, wk37.8 (2.0)37.8 (1.6)NA
 Birth weight, g3135 (610)3068 (521)NA
 Cesarean section, N (%)92 (53.5)42 (48.9)0.566
 Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, N (%)4 (2.3)2 (2.3)1.000
 Respiratory distress syndrome, N (%)1 (0.5)1 (1.0)0.801

IVF, In Vitro Fertilization; OHSS, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome. NA, not applicable. Data are mean (standard deviation) or number (percent). Matching factors (age, gestational age and birth weight) were not tested. For gestational complications, case number are 172 (IVF) and 86 (OHSS). P values were calculated by independent Student t-test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Table 2

Parental characteristics.

CharacteristicNon-OHSS IVF (N = 172)OHSS (N = 86)P value
 Maternal factors
 Maternal Age, yr29.6 (3.3)29.8 (3.8)0.568
 Nulliparous, N (%)135 (78.5)68 (79.1)0.914
 Maternal BMI at delivery, kg/m227.8 (3.1)27.3 (3.6)0.328
 Maternal estradiol level on hCG administration day, pmol/L12,213 (3417)16,159 (4789)< 0.001
 PCOS, N (%)34 (19.8)23 (26.7)0.203
Maternal education level
 Low, N (%)23 (13.4)16 (18.6)0.396
 Middle, N (%)68 (39.5)36 (41.9)
 High, N (%)81 (47.1)34 (39.5)
Type of infertility0.582
 Primary infertility112 (65.1)53 (61.6)
 Secondary infertility60 (34.9)33 (38.4)
Paternal factors
 Paternal Age, yr32.6 (5.5)32.7 (5.7)0.896
 Paternal education level
 Low, N (%)23 (13.4)14 (16.3)0.415
 Middle, N (%)60 (34.9)35 (40.7)
 High, N (%)89 (51.7)37 (43.0)

IVF, In Vitro Fertilization; OHSS, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome. Data are mean (standard deviation) or number (percent). Maternal and paternal education level were classified as low (middle school or below), middle (high school), and high (college or above). P values were calculated by independent Student t-test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Baseline characteristics of children and prenatal outcomes. IVF, In Vitro Fertilization; OHSS, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome. NA, not applicable. Data are mean (standard deviation) or number (percent). Matching factors (age, gestational age and birth weight) were not tested. For gestational complications, case number are 172 (IVF) and 86 (OHSS). P values were calculated by independent Student t-test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Parental characteristics. IVF, In Vitro Fertilization; OHSS, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; BMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome. Data are mean (standard deviation) or number (percent). Maternal and paternal education level were classified as low (middle school or below), middle (high school), and high (college or above). P values were calculated by independent Student t-test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Lower Intelligence Quotients in OHSS Offspring

Intellectual ability was evaluated with C-WISC (Table 3). Offspring from OHSS group scored lower in both VIQ and PIQ. FIQ of OHSS offspring was 6.8 (95%CI 3.6–9.9) lower than that of non-OHSS IVF offspring (Unadjusted). We used multivariable analysis with a linear regression model to control for potential confounding factors and assess effect of prognostic factor. In model 1, we adjusted for child age, gestational age, birth weight, maternal age, nulliparous, maternal PCOS, maternal education, paternal age, paternal education, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, apgar score < 7 and respiratory distress syndrome. FIQ of OHSS offspring was 6.6 (95%CI 3.3–9.9) lower than that of non-OHSS IVF offspring after model 1 adjustment. In model 2, we additionally adjusted for maternal estradiol level on hCG administration day. Difference were insignificant after model 2 adjustment.
Table 3

Intellectual evaluation in offspring.

Non-OHSS IVF (N = 172)OHSS (N = 86)Mean difference (95% CI)UnadjustedMean difference (95% CI)Model 1Mean difference (95% CI)Model 2
Verbal IQ100.1 (13.2)92.7 (14.7)− 7.4 (− 11.0 to − 3.8)− 7.0 (− 10.7 to − 3.3)− 1.4 (− 5.3 to 2.5)
Performance IQ113.7 (10.8)108.9 (13.1)− 4.8 (− 7.8 to − 1.8)− 4.9 (− 8.0 to − 1.8)− 0.6 (− 4.0 to 2.7)
Full IQ107.4 (11.5)100.6 (13.4)− 6.8 (− 9.9 to − 3.6)− 6.6 (− 9.9 to − 3.3)− 1.3 (− 4.7 to 2.1)

Data are mean (SD), or mean difference (95% confidence interval). Model 1 adjusted for child age, gestational age, birth weight, maternal age, nulliparous, maternal PCOS, maternal education, paternal age, paternal education, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, apgar score < 7 and respiratory distress syndrome. Model 2 additionally adjusted for maternal estradiol level on the day of hCG administration.

Intellectual evaluation in offspring. Data are mean (SD), or mean difference (95% confidence interval). Model 1 adjusted for child age, gestational age, birth weight, maternal age, nulliparous, maternal PCOS, maternal education, paternal age, paternal education, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, apgar score < 7 and respiratory distress syndrome. Model 2 additionally adjusted for maternal estradiol level on the day of hCG administration.

Increased Risk of Intellectual Disability in OHSS Offspring

We investigated the prevalence of intellectual disability (IQ < 80) between groups. As shown in Table 4, OHSS offspring showed elevated prevalence of intellectual disability in verbal (19.8% vs 7.0%), performance (4.7% vs 0%) and full IQ (8.1% vs 1.7%) compared with non-OHSS IVF offspring.
Table 4

The prevalence of low IQ (< 80) children.

CharacteristicNon-OHSS IVF (N = 172)OHSS (N = 86)P value
Verbal IQ< 8012 (7.0%)17 (19.8%)< 0.001
Performance IQ< 800 (0.0%)4 (4.7%)0.012
Full IQ< 803 (1.7%)7 (8.1%)0.012

Data are shown as N (%). P values were calculated using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

The prevalence of low IQ (< 80) children. Data are shown as N (%). P values were calculated using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Higher Estradiol is Associated With Lower Intelligence Quotients in OHSS Offspring

To further investigate the effect of prenatal estradiol exposure on offspring IQ, both non-OHSS IVF group and OHSS group were divided into low estradiol and high estradiol subgroups by the 75th percentile value of maternal estradiol level on hCG administration day of non-OHSS IVF group (13,723 pmol/L). The mean estradiol level of each subgroup were 10,653 pmol/L (non-OHSS IVF Low E2),16,501 pmol/L (non-OHSS IVF High E2), 11,382 pmol/L (OHSS Low E2), and 18,571 pmol/L (OHSS High E2). FIQ of high estradiol non-OHSS subgroup was lower compared with low estradiol non-OHSS subgroup. FIQ of high estradiol OHSS subgroup was also lower compared with low estradiol OHSS subgroup. FIQ of low estradiol non-OHSS and low estradiol OHSS subgroup were also similar (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

FIQ of high and low estradiol subgroup in non-OHSS IVF and OHSS offspring. Both non-OHSS IVF group and OHSS group were divided into low E2 and high E2 subgroup by the 75th percentile value of maternal estradiol level on hCG administration day of non-OHSS IVF group (13,723 pmol/L). The boxes extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles. Whiskers indicate the 5 and 95 percentiles. The lines in the middle of the boxes are plotted at the median value. P values were calculated by ANOVA with Turkey post-hoc analysis. E2, Estradiol. FIQ, full intelligence quotient.

FIQ of high and low estradiol subgroup in non-OHSS IVF and OHSS offspring. Both non-OHSS IVF group and OHSS group were divided into low E2 and high E2 subgroup by the 75th percentile value of maternal estradiol level on hCG administration day of non-OHSS IVF group (13,723 pmol/L). The boxes extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles. Whiskers indicate the 5 and 95 percentiles. The lines in the middle of the boxes are plotted at the median value. P values were calculated by ANOVA with Turkey post-hoc analysis. E2, Estradiol. FIQ, full intelligence quotient. To further investigate the relationship between maternal serum estradiol level on hCG administration day and intellectual development of offspring, we performed a linear correlation analysis. The logarithm of maternal serum estradiol level on hCG administration day were negatively correlated with FIQ in OHSS and non-OHSS children (r = − 0.424, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Correlation between maternal serum estradiol levels on hCG administration day and IQ scores in non-OHSS IVF and OHSS offspring (N = 258). Negative linear correlation between maternal serum estradiol levels on hCG administration day and FIQ. FIQ, full intelligence quotient.

Correlation between maternal serum estradiol levels on hCG administration day and IQ scores in non-OHSS IVF and OHSS offspring (N = 258). Negative linear correlation between maternal serum estradiol levels on hCG administration day and FIQ. FIQ, full intelligence quotient.

Discussion

The increasing use of ARTs has helped millions of infertile couples to have children. The long-term safety of ARTs offspring is drawing much attention recently, but little is known about how OHSS will affect offspring. Here, we showed that children born to OHSS women displayed reduced intellectual ability. This problem does not appear to be related to parental factors or the ARTs procedure, but to abnormal hormonal change. The intellectual ability testing tool we used, C-WISC, is the Chinese version of WISC-III. It is widely used for intellectual assessment for children from 3 to 7 (Moura et al., 2014). The main parameters of the C-WISC (VIQ, PIQ, and FIQ) represent the speech, performance, and overall intelligence levels, respectively. The OHSS children manifested reduced function in both speech and performance, especially speech. The study also provided information on potential mechanism. The reduced intellectual ability might come from parental predisposing factors, embryo manipulation during IVF and hormonal effects. Parent-related factors such as concomitant diseases, parental age, or parental education level could be responsible for long-term health problems in the offspring. However, it's unlikely the case in this study. The parental age and education level were similar between the groups. Embryo manipulation during IVF is probably not the reason neither. All OHSS cases in this study underwent IVF, just as the non-OHSS cases. Therefore, we proposed that hormonal effects are the main reason for the reduced intellectual ability. OHSS is a complex syndrome involving multiple factors, such as drastic hormonal change, fluid shift, blood volume depletion. Estradiol elevation is one of the main factors in pathogenesis of OHSS. We have previously showed cardiovascular dysfunction in OHSS children, and following analysis based on proteomics of OHSS umbilical vessels suggested the role of estradiol in it (Xu et al., 2014). In this study, difference of FIQ became insignificant when maternal estradiol level on hCG administration day was added as covariates in model 2. This result indicated that maternal estradiol level is associated with offspring IQ. We further set subgroups divided by estradiol levels, and find reduced FIQ in OHSS high estradiol subgroup, of which mean estradiol concentration on hCG administration day was over 18,000 pmol/L. And correlation analysis also indicated the negative impact of estradiol on offspring IQ. We proposed that estradiol exerted adverse neurological effects when its concentration was above a certain threshold. However, some other hormones other than estradiol, such as vascular endothelial growth factor and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which we were not able to test in the study, might also be responsible for the problems in OHSS offspring. Estradiol might not be the only reason for that. Further studies on the other mechanism are required. There are several limitations and considerations with regard to the present study. Firstly, some parental information, such as social class and income, was not obtained. Although we included parental education information into the study, social class and income, other factors, which were not included, might be influencing factors. Secondly, the evaluated children were 4 to 7 years old and their intelligence levels were still in the rapid development stage. In order to confirm whether the reduction of intellectual ability will persist in adult life, it is necessary to make a longer follow-up.

Funding Sources

The National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2012CB944900) and the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China1 (No. 81490742) were used for data collection and patient recruitment. The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. 2016FZA7002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81270664, 81471421), the Shanghai Hospital Development Center (No.·SHDC12014131) and the Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Zhejiang Province (No. LR14H040001) were partly used for patient recruitment.

Conflicts of Interest

The author(s) declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions

Gu-Feng Xu and Cheng-Liang Zhou analyzed the data and wrote this manuscript, Yi-Meng Xiong, Jing-Yi Li, Tian-Tian Yu, Shen Tian, Xian-Hua Lin, Yun Liao, Yuan Lv, Fang-Hong Zhang, Zhi-Wei Liu, Yin-Yin Shi, Yan Shen and Jin Sha enrolled the participants, reviewed the information of participants and performed the intelligence tests, Dan Zhang prepared the figures, Yi-Min Zhu, Jian-Zhong Sheng and He-Feng Huang designed the cohort study.
  14 in total

1.  Outcome in the second year of life after in-vitro fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a UK case-control study.

Authors:  A G Sutcliffe; B Taylor; K Saunders; S Thornton; B A Lieberman; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  High maternal serum estradiol environment in the first trimester is associated with the increased risk of small-for-gestational-age birth.

Authors:  Xiao-Ling Hu; Chun Feng; Xian-Hua Lin; Zi-Xing Zhong; Yi-Min Zhu; Ping-Ping Lv; Min Lv; Ye Meng; Dan Zhang; Xiu-E Lu; Fan Jin; Jian-Zhong Sheng; Jian Xu; He-Feng Huang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology and prevention.

Authors:  Carolina O Nastri; Rui A Ferriani; Isa A Rocha; Wellington P Martins
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Assessment of memory/attention impairment in children with primary nocturnal enuresis: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Bing Yu; Fanxing Kong; Miao Peng; Hongwei Ma; Na Liu; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Cognitive development of singletons born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilization and natural conception.

Authors:  Marjolein Knoester; Frans M Helmerhorst; Jan P Vandenbroucke; Lucette A J van der Westerlaken; Frans J Walther; Sylvia Veen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Symposium: Update on prediction and management of OHSS. A modern classification of OHSS.

Authors:  Abraham Golan; Ariel Weissman
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 7.  Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review.

Authors:  Annick Delvigne; Serge Rozenberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 8.  Outcome of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Alastair G Sutcliffe; Michael Ludwig
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  WISC-III cognitive profiles in children with developmental dyslexia: specific cognitive disability and diagnostic utility.

Authors:  Octávio Moura; Mário R Simões; Marcelino Pereira
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2013-11-12

10.  Altered thyroid hormone profile in offspring after exposure to high estradiol environment during the first trimester of pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ping-Ping Lv; Ye Meng; Min Lv; Chun Feng; Ye Liu; Jing-Yi Li; Dan-Qin Yu; Yan Shen; Xiao-Lin Hu; Qian Gao; Shan Dong; Xian-Hua Lin; Gu-Feng Xu; Shen Tian; Dan Zhang; Fang-Hong Zhang; Jie-Xue Pan; Xiao-Qun Ye; Miao-E Liu; Xin-Mei Liu; Jian-Zhong Sheng; Guo-Lian Ding; He-Feng Huang
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  5 in total

1.  Risk of Higher Blood Pressure in 3 to 6 Years Old Singleton Born From OHSS Patients Undergone With Fresh IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Yimin Zhu; Yanling Fu; Minyue Tang; Huanmiao Yan; Fanghong Zhang; Xiaoling Hu; Guofang Feng; Yu Sun; Lanfeng Xing
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Substantial Effect of Fenugreek Seeds Aqueous Extract on Serum Estradiol Level in Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Rat Model.

Authors:  Asma S Ben Hameid; Taha A Al-Sindi; Ahmad K Allow; Emad M Nafie; Basma E Alahmad; Ghasak G Faisal
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2019-05

3.  Lipid Metabolic Disorders and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Feifei Liu; Qi Jiang; Xuedong Sun; Yuzhen Huang; Zhenzhen Zhang; Ting Han; Yuhua Shi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Temporary Increased LDL-C in Offspring with Extreme Elevation of Maternal Preconception Estradiol: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wanbing Feng; Di Zhang; Linlin Fu; Jingmei Hu; Shanshan Gao; Xiaocui Song; Linlin Cui
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Diminished verbal ability among children conceived through ART with exposure to high serum estradiol in utero.

Authors:  Cheng-Liang Zhou; Gu-Feng Xu; Qian Yang; Hui-Hui Wang; Meng-Xi Guo; Yi-Meng Xiong; Xiao-Yan Guo; Min Hou; Lu-Yang Jin; Jian-Zhong Sheng; Lin He; Li Jin; He-Feng Huang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.412

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.