Literature DB >> 28532628

Milestones, barriers and beacons: Shared decision making in Canada inches ahead.

France Légaré1, Dawn Stacey2, Pierre-Gerlier Forest3, Marie-France Coutu4, Patrick Archambault5, Laura Boland2, Holly O Witteman6, Annie LeBlanc7, Krystina B Lewis8, Anik M C Giguere9.   

Abstract

Canada's approach to shared decision making (SDM) remains as disparate as its healthcare system; a conglomerate of 14 public plans - ten provincial, three territorial and one federal. The healthcare research funding environment has been largely positive for SDM because there was funding for knowledge translation research which also encompassed SDM. The funding climate currently places new emphasis on patient involvement in research and on patient empowerment in healthcare. SDM fields have expanded from primary care to elder care, paediatrics, emergency and critical care medicine, cardiology, nutrition, occupational therapy and workplace rehabilitation. Also, SDM has reached out to embrace other health-related decisions including about home care and social care and has been adapted to Aboriginal decision making needs. Canadian researchers have developed new interprofessional SDM models that are being used worldwide. Professional interest in SDM in Canada is not yet widespread, but there are provincial initiatives in Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan. Decision aids are routinely used in some areas, for example for prostate cancer in Saskatchewan, and many others are available for online consultation. The Patient Decision Aids Research Group in Ottawa, Ontario maintains an international inventory of decision aids appraised with the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The Canada Research Chair in SDM and Knowledge Translation in Quebec City maintains a website of SDM training programs available worldwide. These initiatives are positive, but the future of SDM in Canada depends on whether health policies, health professionals and the public culture fully embrace it.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; Gesundheits- und Sozialwesen; Implementierungswissenschaft; Kanada; Politikwissenschaft; Wissenstransfer; berufsübergreifend; health and social care; implementation science; interprofessional; knowledge translation; partizipative Entscheidungsfindung; political science; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28532628     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  5 in total

1.  Negotiating "unnecessary": Microclinical, macropolitical, and coproduction approaches to defining necessity in care.

Authors:  Myles Leslie; Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani; Charles Webb; Granger Avery
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2. 

Authors:  Myles Leslie; Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani; Charles Webb; Granger Avery
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A Learning Loop Model of Collaborative Decision-Making in Chronic Illness.

Authors:  Sarah D Ronis; Lawrence C Kleinman; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review.

Authors:  Noel Engels; Gretchen N de Graav; Paul van der Nat; Marinus van den Dorpel; Anne M Stiggelbout; Willem Jan Bos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Medical Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Shared Decision Making: Results From a Multinational, Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Renata W Yen; Paul J Barr; Nan Cochran; Johanna W Aarts; France Légaré; Malcolm Reed; A James O'Malley; Peter Scalia; Geneviève Painchaud Guérard; Grant Backer; Clifford Reilly; Glyn Elwyn; Marie-Anne Durand
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-11-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.