Literature DB >> 28532604

Validation of DWI pre-processing procedures for reliable differentiation between human brain gliomas.

Sebastian Vellmer1, Aram S Tonoyan2, Dieter Suter3, Igor N Pronin2, Ivan I Maximov4.   

Abstract

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is a powerful tool in clinical applications, in particular, in oncology screening. dMRI demonstrated its benefit and efficiency in the localisation and detection of different types of human brain tumours. Clinical dMRI data suffer from multiple artefacts such as motion and eddy-current distortions, contamination by noise, outliers etc. In order to increase the image quality of the derived diffusion scalar metrics and the accuracy of the subsequent data analysis, various pre-processing approaches are actively developed and used. In the present work we assess the effect of different pre-processing procedures such as a noise correction, different smoothing algorithms and spatial interpolation of raw diffusion data, with respect to the accuracy of brain glioma differentiation. As a set of sensitive biomarkers of the glioma malignancy grades we chose the derived scalar metrics from diffusion and kurtosis tensor imaging as well as the neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) biophysical model. Our results show that the application of noise correction, anisotropic diffusion filtering, and cubic-order spline interpolation resulted in the highest sensitivity and specificity for glioma malignancy grading. Thus, these pre-processing steps are recommended for the statistical analysis in brain tumour studies.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data smoothing algorithm; Diffusion MRI; Glioma differentiation; Noise correction; Pre-processing schemes; Spatial interpolation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28532604     DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2017.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Med Phys        ISSN: 0939-3889            Impact factor:   4.820


  3 in total

Review 1.  What's new and what's next in diffusion MRI preprocessing.

Authors:  Chantal M W Tax; Matteo Bastiani; Jelle Veraart; Eleftherios Garyfallidis; M Okan Irfanoglu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 7.400

2.  Towards an optimised processing pipeline for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data: Effects of artefact corrections on diffusion metrics and their age associations in UK Biobank.

Authors:  Ivan I Maximov; Dag Alnaes; Lars T Westlye
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Feasibility of generalised diffusion kurtosis imaging approach for brain glioma grading.

Authors:  E L Pogosbekian; I N Pronin; N E Zakharova; A I Batalov; A M Turkin; T A Konakova; I I Maximov
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.804

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.