| Literature DB >> 28532433 |
Vani Sethi1, Arti Bhanot2, Surbhi Bhalla2, Sourav Bhattacharjee3, Abner Daniel4, Deepika Mehrish Sharma5, Rajkumar Gope6, Saba Mebrahtu7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the feasibility of engaging women collectives in delivering a package of women's nutrition messages/services as a funded stakeholder in three tribal-dominated districts of Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh States, in eastern India. These districts have high prevalence of child stunting and poor government service outreach.Entities:
Keywords: Capacity assessment; Governance; Grants; Women collectives; Women’s nutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28532433 PMCID: PMC5441055 DOI: 10.1186/s41043-017-0099-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Fig. 1Process for mapping NGOs serving as promoting agencies for community collectives
Fig. 2Sampling procedures for selecting community collectives for capacity assessment. *tier 1 and 2 collectives selected separately in Bastar and Koraput, while only collectives federated at tier 2 considered for sampling in West Singhbhum
Demographic profile of Bastar, Koraput and West Singhbhum
| Indicators | Bastara | Koraput | West Singhbhum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population (total) | 14,13,199 | 13,79,647 | 15,02,338 |
| Population (male) | 6,98,487 | 6,78,809 | 7,49,385 |
| Population (female) | 7,14,712 | 700,838 | 7,52,953 |
| Child population (0 to 6 years) | 2,16,713 | 2,25,126 | 2,61,493 |
| Population density (population per sq km) | 135 | 156 | 208 |
| Decadal growth rate | 18.3 | 16.6 | 13.5 |
| Sex ratio at birth | 930 | 911 | 983 |
| SC population (%) | 2.7 | 14.2 | 3.8 |
| ST population (%) | 66.3 | 50.6 | 67.3 |
| PVTG (n) | NA | NA | 1823 |
| Adult literacy (%) | 66.3 | 49.9 | 58.6 |
| Households (n) | 3,10,359 | 3,37,677 | 3,02,046 |
| Household size | 4.5 | 4.1 | 5 |
| Area (sq km) | 4030 | 8807 | 7224 |
| Blocks | 7 | 14 | 18 |
| Villages | 611 | 1985 | 1792 |
Source: Census of India 2011
aData for undivided district including Kondagaon except area, block and village data
NA (No PVTG in that district)
Coverage of five essential interventions across the three study districts
| Essential interventions and indicators (sources) | Bastar | Koraput | West Singhbhum |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Improved food and nutrition intake | |||
| % villages having PDS shops (HUNGaMA survey, 2011) | NA | 45 | 81 |
| % rural households using PDS service (HUNGaMA survey, 2011) | NA | 42 | 61 |
| 2. Prevent micronutrient deficiency and anaemia | |||
| % mothers consumed IFA tablets atleast 100 days (AHS 2012–13) | 26.7 | 22.1 | 18.3 |
| Malaria API (NVBDP 2012) | >10 | >10 | >10 |
| % Plasmodium falciparum cases (DPMU, NHM (Bastar), Malaria Journal 2012a (Koraput), DHFW 2014 (West Singhbhum) | 95.2 | 89.1 | 80.3 |
| 3. Improving access to basic health and special care for at-risk | |||
| %pregnant women registered in the first trimester (DLHS 3) | 28 | 50 | 35 |
| % mothers received at least one TT injection (AHS 2012–13) | 88.7 | 96.8 | 86.7 |
| % mothers receiving at least 3 ANC check-ups (AHS 2012–13) | 69.4 | 74.9 | 61.4 |
| % institutional delivery (AHS 2012–13) | 67.1 | 53.4 | 38.5 |
| % mothers receiving postnatal check-up(within 48 h) (AHS 2012–13) | 77.2 | 67.5 | 53.9 |
| 4. Improving hygiene and sanitation and access to safe drinking water | |||
| % households having access to hand pump or other safe drinking water systems (Census 2011) | 77.7 | 73.9 | 58.6 |
| % households having toilets (Census 2011) | 20.3 | 17.4 | 11.8 |
| % women reporting hand washing before preparing a meal (HUNGaMA survey, 2011) | NA | 10 | 1 |
| 5. Preventing pregnancies too early, too many and too soon | |||
| % women aged 20 to 24 who were married at 18 years or less (AHS 2012–13) | 44.8 | 46.7 | 33.8 |
| % women aged 20–24 reporting birth of order ≥3 (AHS 2012–13) | 18.3 | 35.4 | 41.2 |
| % use of modern contraceptive methods (AHS 2012–13) | 48.2 | 33.6 | 32.2 |
NA (No PVTG in that district)
Ministries and linked programmes or initiatives through which community collectives are promoted in study districts
| Ministry | Programmes/initiative | Bastar | Koraput | West Singhbhum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ministry of Rural Development | NRLM Aajeevika | √ | √ | √ |
| Integrated Watershed Management Projects | √ | √ | √ | |
| Ministry of Tribal Affairs | ITDA | – | √a | – |
| Ministry of Women and Child Development | ICDS | √ | √ | √ |
| Mission Shakti | - | √ | - | |
| Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies | PDS | √ | √ | √ |
| Ministry of Finance | NABARD, SHG-Bank linkage programme, Farmers clubs | √ | √ | √ |
| Ministry of Health and Family Welfare | NRHM, Village Heath and Sanitation Committees | √ | √ | √ |
| Ministry of Human Resource Development | Sarv Sikhsha Abhiyaan | √ | √ | √ |
| Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change | Forest conservation/Integrated Wildlife Management | √ | √ | √ |
√ implies Yes – implies not applicable
aOdisha Tribal Empowerment and Livelihood Project
Positions filled and attrition ratesa at state, district and block management units of the SRLM
| Positions filled (%) and attrition rates (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| State | District | Block | |
| Chhattisgarh | 79 (15) | 55 (17) | 77 (22) |
| Jharkhand | 94 (4) | 75 (7) | 72 (4) |
| Odisha | 43 (21) | 21 (17) | 60 (NA) |
aFigure in parenthesis is attrition rate
NA (No PVTG in that district)
Common types of community collectives, their composition, structural tiers and membership across all study districts
| S.No. | Type | Composition | Tiers | Number of members | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | Bastar | Koraput | West Singhbhum | |||
| 1 | Farmer Club | Mixed | √ | X | X | 4100 | 5086 | 4352 |
| 2 | Forest Committee | Mixed | √ | X | X | 3520 | 16,517 | 2690 |
| 3 | SHG | Women | √ | √ | √ | 68,332 | 205,171 | 117,558 |
| 4 | Village Education Committee | Mixed | √ | X | X | 40,160 | 49,932 | 40,646 |
| 5 | Village Health and Sanitation Committeea | Mixed | √ | X | X | 7080 | 17,282 | – |
| 6 | Watershed Committees | Mixed | √ | X | X | 850 | 86,567 | 4750 |
√ implies yes, X implies no
aReferred to as Village Health, Sanitation and Nutrition Committees in Jharkhand
Fig. 3Distribution of SHGs based on the structural tiers