| Literature DB >> 28532415 |
Tae-Hun Kim1, Boncho Ku2, Jang-Han Bae2, Jae-Young Shin3, Min-Ho Jun2, Jung Won Kang4, Junghwan Kim4, Jun-Hwan Lee3, Jaeuk U Kim5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radial pressure pulse wave (RPPW) examination has been a key diagnostic component of traditional Chinese medicine. The objective of this study was to investigate the changes in RPPW along with various hemodynamic variables after acupuncture stimulation and to examine the validity of pulse diagnosis as a modern diagnostic tool.Entities:
Keywords: Acupuncture; Hemodynamic variables; KIOM-PAS; Radial artery pressure pulse wave; Radial artery ultrasonography
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28532415 PMCID: PMC5440909 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1787-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Study procedure for the assessment of hemodynamic and RPPW variables at the following points: pre-acupuncture, immediately after needle insertion, during needle insertion, and removal of needle
Fig. 2The overall features of KIOM-PAS for the assessment of radial artery pulse pressure in different positions (left: sitting position, right: lying position). The figure was epitomized from the previous article that described the study protocol of this study [11]
Description of parameters related with the radial artery pulse-pressure wave and other bio-signal characteristics
| Variable (units) | Description |
|---|---|
| Radial pressure pulse wave | |
| SE0-10Hz (Vrms 2, 10−1) | Sum of the spectral energy within 0–10 Hz |
| SE10-30Hz (Vrms 2, 10−3) | Sum of the spectral energy within 10–30 Hz |
| PPI (V) | Pulse power index; Maximum amplitude of the voltage response in radial artery pulse |
| PDI (mm) | Pulse depth index; measure of the pulse depth based on the sensor displacement in the direction normal to the skin surface |
| Systolic area (Vs) | Area of systolic phase in average pulse |
| Diastolic area (Vs) | Area of diastolic phase in average pulse |
| SEVR (%, 10−2) | Subendocardial viability ratio; ratio between the diastolic and systolic area |
| AIX (%) | Radial augmentation index normalized to a heart rate of 75 bpm; (late systolic pressure/systolic pressure) × 100 |
| Heart rate variability | |
| NN (s) | Normal to normal interval |
| SDNN (ms) | Standard deviation of the NN interval |
| RMSSD (ms) | Square root of the mean squared differences of NN intervals |
| TF (ms2) | Total frequency power within 0–0.4 Hz |
| LF (ms2) | Low frequency power within 0.04–0.15 Hz |
| HF (ms2) | High frequency power within 0.15–0.4 Hz |
| nLF (%) | LF power in normalized units; LF/(LF + HF) |
| nHF (%) | HF power in normalized units; HF/(LF + HF) |
| LF/HF | Ratio of low to high frequency components; LF/HF |
| Photoplethysmogram signals | |
| PPG amplitude (V) | Maximum amplitude in average PPG |
| PPG systolic area (Vs) | Area of systolic phase in average PPG |
| Respiration signals | |
| Respiration rate (bpm) | Number of respirations per minute. |
| Impedance cardiography | |
| SV (ml) | Stroke volume: volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per beat |
| CO (ml/min) | Cardiac output: volume of blood being pumped from the heart per minute; stroke volume × heart rate |
| Combined variable from radial pressure pulse wave and electrocardiography | |
| PTT (ms) | Time delay between the R-peak of the ECG and the peak of the RPPW |
Fig. 3CONSORT diagram for the study. Each rounded rectangle with a gray background indicates a procedure of the study, and the rectangles with a white background show the number of dropout cases and the reasons
Demographic characteristics of the participants
| Characteristics | Value (Total number = 25) |
|---|---|
| Sex (n, %) | |
| Female | 13 (52.0) |
| Male | 12 (48.0) |
| Smoking (n, %) | |
| None | 2 (8.0) |
| Former smoker | 23 (92.0) |
| Caffeine (n, %) | |
| None | 12 (48.0) |
| Former user | 1 (4.0) |
| Current user | 12 (48.0) |
| Alcohol (n, %) | |
| None | 15 (60.0) |
| Former consumer | 1 (4.0) |
| Current consumer | 9 (36.0) |
| Level of physical activity (n, %)a | |
| Low | 15 (60.0) |
| Moderate | 1 (4.0) |
| High | 9 (36.0) |
| Experience of Acupuncture (n, %) | |
| No | 6 (24.0) |
| Yes | 19 (76.0) |
| Age (mean, SD) | 23.3 (2.4) |
| Height (mean, SD) | 168.0 (8.9) |
| Weight (mean, SD) | 61.7 (11.3) |
| BMI (mean, SD) | 21.7 (2.5) |
| Systolic BP (mean, SD) | 111.6 (10.3) |
| Diastolic BP (mean, SD) | 73.6 (5.6) |
| Pulse (mean, SD) | 74.8 (5.6) |
| Body temperature (mean, SD) | 36.3 (0.2) |
| Expectation for acupuncture (mean, SD)b | 6.5 (0.8) |
| Acupuncture-sensational score (mean, SD)c | 1.5 (1.6) |
aPhysical activity level was assessed through the global physical activity questionnaire
bExpectation for acupuncture was assessed through the credibility/expectancy questionnaire
cAcupuncture sensation was assessed through the acupuncture sensation questionnaire
Results of assessments on the variables related to the radial artery pressure-pulse wave
| Variables | Assessment schedule | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5 min | 0 | +7 min | +14 min | +20 min | +27 min | |
| Baseline (Reference)a | Needle insertiona | During needle retentiona | Needle removala | Finala | ||
| SE10-30Hz
| 1.76 | −0.05 | −0.45 | −0.26 | −0.34 | −0.77* |
| SE0-10Hz
| 7.78 | 0.49 | 0.95* | 1.20** | 1.39*** | 1.79*** |
| PPI (V) | 3.20 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.24** | 0.27*** | 0.31*** |
| PDI (mm) | 6.96 | 0.08 | −0.22 | −0.22 | −0.45 | −0.34 |
| PVI (mm) | 2.51 | 0.21 | 0.46*** | 0.32* | 0.13 | 0.27 |
| Systolic area (Vs) | 575.61 | 32.09 | 23.72 | 54.50** | 61.68*** | 92.49*** |
| Diastolic area (Vs) | 220.79 | 3.76 | 2.39 | 10.25 | 12.19* | 18.09** |
| SEVR (%) | 39.33 | −1.58 | −1.60 | −2.58* | −2.48* | −3.35** |
| AIX (%) | 39.28 | 1.81 | 0.49 | −2.93 | 1.12 | 1.70 |
| PTT (ms) | 284.97 | 0.67 | 3.17 | 1.80 | 4.87 | 4.22 |
SE spectral energy of 10 to 30 Hz, SE spectral energy of 0 to 10 Hz, PPI pulse power index, PDI pulse depth index, PVI pulse volume index, SEVR subendocardial viability ratio, AIX radial augmentation index, PTT pulse transit time
aValues represent adjusted mean differences between the baseline and each assessment during the needling procedure as well as their 95% CI based on the result of LMM for each parameter. Mean differences were adjusted for age, sex, height, pulse rate, BMI, GPAQ, CEQ and experience of acupuncture. Dunnett’s test was applied to control the family-wise error rate due to the multiple comparisons of the mean difference between baseline and each assessment stage for each variable. The statistical significance was indicated with asterisks: ***,p < 0.001; **,p < 0.01; *,p < 0.05
Results for the bio-signal variables
| Variables | Assessment schedule | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5 min | 0 | +7 min | +14 min | +20 min | +27 min | |
| Baseline (Reference)a | Needle insertiona | During needle retentiona | Needle removala | Finala | ||
| Heart rate variability (HRV) | ||||||
| NN (s) | 0.89 | 0.01 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.02 | −0.02* |
| SDNN (ms) | 60.89 | 2.97 | 0.82 | 3.22 | 1.41 | 4.26 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 41.51 | 0.76 | −2.21 | −1.44 | −3.15 | −3.19 |
| TF (ms2) | 1407.53 | −190.15 | −91.18 | −69.81 | −13.75 | 26.67 |
| LF (ms2) | 432.39 | −54.68 | −45.23 | −45.86 | −12.04 | 77.89 |
| HF (ms2) | 256.67 | −17.95 | −42.69 | −62.72 | −68.12 | −97.81* |
| nLF (%) | 53.03 | −2.90 | 5.01 | 4.26 | 7.10 | 9.50* |
| nHF (%) | 43.72 | 2.39 | −5.11 | −4.31 | −7.23 | −9.40* |
| LF/HF | 2.03 | −0.37 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.98* |
| Respiration | ||||||
| Respiratory rate (bpm) | 14.49 | 0.11 | 0.43 | −0.21 | 0.22 | −0.15 |
| PPG signals | ||||||
| Amplitude (V) | 0.38 | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Systolic area (Vs) | 94.50 | 0.18 | 8.17 | 8.73 | 7.26 | 12.00** |
| ICG signals | ||||||
| Cardiac output (ml/min) | 7107.78 | −182.77 | −395.31 | −509.858 | −261.268 | −239.630 |
| Stroke volume (ml) | 105.659 | −5.084 | −8.855 | −10.239 | −11.781 | −11.699 |
NN normal to normal interval, SDNN standard deviation of the NN interval, RMSDD square root of the mean squared differences of NN intervals, TF total frequency, LF low-frequency domain, HF high-frequency domain, nLF normalized low-frequency domain, nHF normalized high-frequency domain
**,p < 0.01; *,p < 0.05
aValues represent differences between the baseline and each assessment during the needling procedure (95% CI). The other details are identical to the footnote of Table 3 except for following abbreviations
Results of assessments on the variables from radial artery ultrasonography
| Variables | Assessment schedule | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5 min | 0 | +7 min | +14 min | +20 min | +27 min | |
| Baseline (Reference)a | Needle insertiona | During needle retentiona | Needle removala | Finala | ||
| Diameter of radial artery (mm) | 2.01 | 0.08 | −0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | −0.07 |
| Maximum velocity of blood flow (cm/s) | 5.29 | 2.30*** | 2.46*** | 1.35** | 0.54 | 0.19 |
| Average velocity of blood flow (cm/s) | 9.31 | 4.09*** | 4.52*** | 2.45** | 1.10 | 0.30 |
***,p < 0.001; **,p < 0.01;
aValues represent differences between the baseline and each assessment during the needling procedure (95% CI). The last details are identical to the footnote of Table 3
Fig. 4Estimated mean profiles of hemodynamic and RPPW measures for the main discussion. Each dot and line represent the least squared mean and its standard error, derived from the identical LMM used in the results shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5. Asterisks indicate the magnitude of statistical significance for the mean difference between baseline (−5 min) and the other assessment stages. Detailed descriptions of the tests are provided in Table 3, 4 and 5. The family-wise type I error rate was adjusted with Dunnett’s test. ***,p < 0.001; **,p < 0.01; *,p < 0.05