Literature DB >> 28532357

Visual Object Recognition: Do We (Finally) Know More Now Than We Did?

Isabel Gauthier1, Michael J Tarr2.   

Abstract

How do we recognize objects despite changes in their appearance? The past three decades have been witness to intense debates regarding both whether objects are encoded invariantly with respect to viewing conditions and whether specialized, separable mechanisms are used for the recognition of different object categories. We argue that such dichotomous debates ask the wrong question. Much more important is the nature of object representations: What are features that enable invariance or differential processing between categories? Although the nature of object features is still an unanswered question, new methods for connecting data to models show significant potential for helping us to better understand neural codes for objects. Most prominently, new approaches to analyzing data from functional magnetic resonance imaging, including neural decoding and representational similarity analysis, and new computational models of vision, including convolutional neural networks, have enabled a much more nuanced understanding of visual representation. Convolutional neural networks are particularly intriguing as a tool for studying biological vision in that this class of artificial vision systems, based on biologically plausible deep neural networks, exhibits visual recognition capabilities that are approaching those of human observers. As these models improve in their recognition performance, it appears that they also become more effective in predicting and accounting for neural responses in the ventral cortex. Applying these and other deep models to empirical data shows great promise for enabling future progress in the study of visual recognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  category selectivity; decoding; deep neural networks; face recognition; invariance; object recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28532357     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci        ISSN: 2374-4642            Impact factor:   6.422


  13 in total

Review 1.  The Organization and Operation of Inferior Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Bevil R Conway
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.422

2.  The Dorsal Visual Pathway Represents Object-Centered Spatial Relations for Object Recognition.

Authors:  Vladislav Ayzenberg; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Assessing creativity independently of language: A language-independent remote associate task (LI-RAT).

Authors:  Maxi Becker; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-10

4.  Hippocampal activation and connectivity in the aging brain.

Authors:  Lori L Beason-Held; Andrea T Shafer; Joshua O Goh; Bennett A Landman; Christos Davatzikos; Brieana Viscomi; Jessica Ash; Melissa Kitner-Triolo; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.224

5.  A Developmental Approach to Machine Learning?

Authors:  Linda B Smith; Lauren K Slone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-05

6.  Influence of DARPP-32 genetic variation on BOLD activation to happy faces.

Authors:  Ninni Persson; Catarina Lavebratt; Natalie C Ebner; Håkan Fischer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Emotional learning promotes perceptual predictions by remodeling stimulus representation in visual cortex.

Authors:  E Meaux; V Sterpenich; P Vuilleumier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Color statistics of objects, and color tuning of object cortex in macaque monkey.

Authors:  Isabelle Rosenthal; Sivalogeswaran Ratnasingam; Theodros Haile; Serena Eastman; Josh Fuller-Deets; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Range of motion and between-measurement variation of spinal kinematics in sound horses at trot on the straight line and on the lunge.

Authors:  A M Hardeman; A Byström; L Roepstorff; J H Swagemakers; P R van Weeren; F M Serra Bragança
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Matteo Valsecchi; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.