Literature DB >> 28532041

Comparative analysis of stress in a new proposal of dental implants.

Mariana Lima da Costa Valente1, Denise Tornavoi de Castro2, Ana Paula Macedo3, Antonio Carlos Shimano4, Andréa Cândido Dos Reis5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare, through photoelastic analysis, the stress distribution around conventional and modified external hexagon (EH) and morse taper (MT) dental implant connections. Four photoelastic models were prepared (n=1): Model 1 - conventional EH cylindrical implant (Ø 4.0mm×11mm - Neodent®), Model 2 - modified EH cylindrical implant, Model 3 - conventional MT Conical implant (Ø 4.3mm×10mm - Neodent®) and Model 4 - modified MT conical implant. 100 and 150N axial and oblique loads (30° tilt) were applied in the devices coupled to the implants. A plane transmission polariscope was used in the analysis of fringes and each position of interest was recorded by a digital camera. The Tardy method was used to quantify the fringe order (n), that calculates the maximum shear stress (τ) value in each selected point. The results showed lower stress concentration in the modified cylindrical implant (EH) compared to the conventional model, with application of 150N axial and 100N oblique loads. Lower stress was observed for the modified conical (MT) implant with the application of 100 and 150N oblique loads, which was not observed for the conventional implant model. The comparative analysis of the models showed that the new design proposal generates good stress distribution, especially in the cervical third, suggesting the preservation of bone tissue in the bone crest region.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Dental implants; Design; Mechanical stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28532041     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  1 in total

Review 1.  Bioengineering Tools Applied to Dentistry: Validation Methods for In Vitro and In Silico Analysis.

Authors:  Jefferson David Melo de Matos; Daher Antonio Queiroz; Leonardo Jiro Nomura Nakano; Valdir Cabral Andrade; Nathália de Carvalho Ramos Ribeiro; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Marco Antonio Bottino; Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.