| Literature DB >> 28531915 |
Ervina Julien Sitanggang1, Radiana Dhewayani Antarianto2, Sri Widia A Jusman3, Jeanne Adiwinata Pawitan2, Ahmad Aulia Jusuf2.
Abstract
Transplantation of bone marrow derived stem cells (BMSCs) has been reported inhibits liver fibrosis. Several in vitro studies by co-culturing BMSCs and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) indirectly or directly in 2D models showed inhibition of HSC as the key player in liver fibrosis. In this study, we investigated direct effect of BMSCs on HSCs by co-culturing BMSCs and HSCs in 3D model as it represents the liver microenvironment with intricate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Primary isolated rat HSCs and BMSCs were directly co-cultured at 1:1 ratio with hanging drop method. The monoculture of rat HSCs served as positive control. Mono-culture and co-culture samples were harvested on day 3, 5 and 7 for histological analysis. The samples were analyzed for extracellular matrix deposition by Masson's Trichrome staining, tenascin-C immunocytochemistry, resting HSC's state as shown by positive Oil Red O stained cells. Our results indicated CD90+CD34- BMSCs anti-liver fibrosis potency as evidenced by higher proportion of Oil Red O-positive cells in the co-culture group compared to the monoculture group and the significant decrease in extracellular matrix deposition as well as the decrease in tenascin-C expression in the co-culture group (p<0.05) compared to the monoculture group. These findings demonstrate that BMSCs have a potential therapeutic effect against liver fibrotic process through their capacity to inhibit HSCs activation and their effect in minimizing extracellular matrix deposition.Entities:
Keywords: 3D co-culture; Bone marrow derived stem cells; Hepatic stellate cells; Liver fibrosis; Tenascin-C
Year: 2017 PMID: 28531915 PMCID: PMC5488778 DOI: 10.15283/ijsc16048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stem Cells ISSN: 2005-3606 Impact factor: 2.500
Fig. 1Phenotype of BMSCs. (A) Isotype Control APC-PE. (B) BMSCs stained with APC-labeled anti-CD90 and PE-labeled anti-CD34 antibody. (C) A table describing percentage of cell population in each quadrant in FACS blot.
Fig. 2Comparison of extracellular matrix deposition with Masson Trichrome staining (400× magnification). (A) Microphotograph Masson’s Trichrome stained hanging drop mono-culture day 7 (400× magnification). (B) Microphotograph Masson’s Trichrome stained hanging drop co-culture day 7 (400× magnification). (C) Mean proportion of lighter stained area which indicate least abundant extracellular matrix deposition. *Indicate significant difference between mean proportion of mono-culture 3D with co-culture 3D.
Fig. 3Comparison between Positive Tenasicn C area. (A) Microphotograph immunochemitry Tenascin-C negative control 3D mono-culture day 7, 400× magnification. (B) Microphotograph immunochemitry Tenascin-C 3D mono-culture day 7, 400× magnification. (C) Microphotograph immunochemistry tenascin-C 3D co-culture day 7, 400× magnification. (D) Mean of proportion of positive Tenascin-C area. *Indicate statistical significant difference.