| Literature DB >> 28531912 |
Sung-Hwan Moon1, Daekyeong Bae2, Taek-Hee Jung3, Eun-Bin Chung3, Young-Hoon Jeong3, Soon-Jung Park3, Hyung-Min Chung3.
Abstract
Human cardiomyocytes (CMs) cease to proliferate and remain terminally differentiated thereafter, when humans reach the mid-20s. Thus, any damages sustained by myocardium tissue are irreversible, and they require medical interventions to regain functionality. To date, new surgical procedures and drugs have been developed, albeit with limited success, to treat various heart diseases including myocardial infarction. Hence, there is a pressing need to develop more effective treatment methods to address the increasing mortality rate of the heart diseases. Functional CMs are not only an important in vitro cellular tool to model various types of heart diseases for drug development, but they are also a promising therapeutic agent for cell therapy. However, the limited proliferative capacity entails difficulties in acquiring functional CMs in the scale that is required for pathological studies and cell therapy development. Stem cells, human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) in particular, have been considered as an unlimited cellular source for providing functional CMs for various applications. Notable progress has already been made: the first clinical trials of hPSCs derived CMs (hPSC-CMs) for treating myocardial infarction was approved in 2015, and their potential use in disease modeling and drug discovery is being fully explored. This concise review gives an account of current development of differentiation, purification and maturation techniques for hPSC-CMs, and their application in cell therapy development and pharmaceutical industries will be discussed with the latest experimental evidence.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiomyocytes; Cell therapy; Disease modeling; Drug discovery; Human pluripotent stem cell
Year: 2017 PMID: 28531912 PMCID: PMC5488771 DOI: 10.15283/ijsc17024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stem Cells ISSN: 2005-3606 Impact factor: 2.500
Fig. 1Representative differentiation methods for hPSC-CMs. Differentiation strategies for hPSC-CMs can largely be divided into three most commonly used methods: via EB formation, 2D monolayer differentiation and co-culture system. The first two methods require supplementation of differentiation inducers (growth factors and small molecules) whereas these factors are redundant in the END-2 co-culture system. Abbreviations: EB: embryoid body, BMP4: bone morphogenetic protein 4.
Fig. 2Stage-specific differentiation inducers and cell characteristics. hPSC-CMs differentiation takes place sequentially as shown above. The cells exhibit distinct phenotypic and genotypic characteristics pertaining to a specific stage, where a combination of differentiation inducers is supplemented to proceed to the next stage. The final stage of the differentiation involves maturation of nascent and immature CMs.
Fig. 3Purification and maturation for hPSC-CMs. hPSC-CMs are enriched following the differentiation because the procedure inevitably yields by-products. The purified hPSC-CMs exhibit immature characteristics, as the differentiation methods are often completed 20–30 days after the initiation. Purification and maturation are prerequisite procedures for subsequent applications of hPSC-CMs. Abbreviations: FACs: fluorescence activated cell sorting, MACs: magnetic activated cell sorting.
Pre-clinical and clinical studies of hPSC-CMs for treating cardiac injuries
| Experiments | Disease | Animal | Implantation | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-clinical | Complete AV block | Pig | Cell injection | Electromechanical integration | ( |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Rat | Gelatin Scaffold | Preservation of graft size ↑ | ( | |
| Mouse | Cell injection | EF ↑, Infarct area ↓ | ( | ||
| Chronic myocardial infarction | Mouse | Cell injection | Infarct size ↓, Vascular density ↑ | ( | |
| Rat | Cell injection | Graft volume↑, Vascular density ↑ | ( | ||
| Minipig | Cell sheet | EF ↑, Vascularization | ( | ||
| Mouse, Monkey | Cell injection | Electrical coupling, Graft-host synchronization, Non-fatal arrhythmias | ( | ||
| Cryo-injury | Guinea pig | Cell injection | Electrical coupling, Graft-host synchronization | ( | |
| Normal | Rat | Cardiac patch | Regeneration of host cardiomyocytes | ( | |
| Clinical | Myocardial infarction | Human | Fibrin patch | EF ↑, Graft-myocardial tissue | ( |
Drug screening using patients’ iPSC-CMs (y: year-old)
| Cardiovascular disease | Gene mutation | Donor | Drug test | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LQT-1 | KCNQ1 (R190Q) | 8 y, 42 y Male | Isoproterenol | ( |
| LQT-2 | KCNH2 (A614V) | 28 y Female | Nifedipine, Pinacidil, Ranolazine | ( |
| KCNH2 (HERG), A614V, G1681A | - | Isoproterenol, Hydrochloride, Nifedipine, Ranolazine, Dihydrochloride, Pinacidil monohydrate, Cisapride, E-4031, Sotalol | ( | |
| LQT-3 | SCN5A(F1473C) | - | Mexiletine, Flecainide | ( |
| LQT-8 | Cav1.2 (G406R) | - | - | ( |
| CACNA1CG1216A | - | Roscovitine | ( | |
| LQT | KCNH2 | Male | Moxifloxacin | ( |
| NK2, SCN5A, KCNQ1, CACNA1C, CALM1, KCNE2, KCNH2, KCNJ5 | 18~40 y Male, Female | Sotalol | ( | |
| CPVT | RyR2 (S406L) | 24 y Female | Dantrolene | ( |
| RyR2 (M4109R) | 30 y Female | Forskolin, Isoproterenol, Flecainide | ( | |
| RYR2, S406L, CASQ2, D307H | - | Dantrolene, Isoproterenol | ( | |
| DCM | TNNT2, R173W | Male, Female | Norepinephrine | ( |
| cTnT-R173W | 14 y Male | Omecamtiv mecarbil | ( | |
| HCM | MYH7 c.1988GNA; p.R663H | 53 y Female | Isoproterenol, Propranolol, Verapamil | ( |
| Pompe disease | GAA | - | 3-MA, L-carnitine | ( |
| Barth syndrome | Tafazzin, BTH-H TAZ | - | mitoTEMPO | ( |
| Familiar dilated cardiomyopathy | TNNT2, R173W | - | Metoprolol | ( |
| ARVD/C | PKP2 Plakophilin-2 | Male, Female | - | ( |
| Brugada syndrome/LQT-3 | E1784K SCN5A | 20 y, 34 y Male | - | ( |
| Brugada syndrome | SCN5A-1795insD | 42 y, 67 y Male, 24 y Female | - | ( |
| Cardiac arrhythmia | - | Male, Female | Tyrosine kinase inhibitors | ( |