U Keilholz1, L Rohde2, P Mehlitz2, M Knoedler1, A Schmittel1, V Kümmerlen1, K Klinghammer1, P Treasure3, M Lassus4, G Steventon5, M Machacek6, N Utku7. 1. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Campus Mitte & Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. 2. Institute for Medical Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany. 3. Statistical Services, London, UK. 4. M Lassus Consulting, Milan, Italy. 5. Kings College, London, UK. 6. LYO-X, Basel, Switzerland. 7. Institute for Medical Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany; CellAct Pharma, Dortmund, Germany. Electronic address: nalan.utku@charite.de.
Abstract
AIM: An open-label, phase I dose-escalation trial was performed in adult patients with various solid cancers to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic profile and anti-tumour activity of the new prodrug CAP7.1. The prodrug is converted to its active moiety etoposide via carboxylesterases in selective cells leading to a better tolerability and higher efficacy in therapeutic resistance cells and children with refractory neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible adult patients with advanced, refractory, solid malignancies received CAP7.1 as intravenous infusion on 5 consecutive days. Doses were escalated in four cohorts consisting of three to six patients, with a starting dose of 45 mg/m2/day. Treatment cycles were repeated in 21-day intervals in the absence of disease progression and prohibitive toxicity. The safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy were evaluated, and the MTD and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) were determined. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were assigned to four CAP7.1 dose cohorts (45, 90, 150 and 200 mg/m2/day). CAP7.1 was well tolerated. Haematotoxicity was observed at the two highest dose levels including three DLTs (two febrile neutropenia and one sepsis) only and were reversible with adequate therapy. No organ toxicity was observed. Non-haematological toxicities (mild-moderate) consist mainly of nausea, fatigue, vomiting, pyrexia and alopecia. One partial response and 11 stable diseases were observed as supporting signs of efficacy. CONCLUSION: MTD of CAP7.1 was reached at the dose of 200 mg/m2. A favourable safety profile and initial anti-tumour efficacy of CAP7.1 in therapeutic refractory tumours warrant further evaluation in clinical studies.
AIM: An open-label, phase I dose-escalation trial was performed in adult patients with various solid cancers to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic profile and anti-tumour activity of the new prodrug CAP7.1. The prodrug is converted to its active moiety etoposide via carboxylesterases in selective cells leading to a better tolerability and higher efficacy in therapeutic resistance cells and children with refractory neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible adult patients with advanced, refractory, solid malignancies received CAP7.1 as intravenous infusion on 5 consecutive days. Doses were escalated in four cohorts consisting of three to six patients, with a starting dose of 45 mg/m2/day. Treatment cycles were repeated in 21-day intervals in the absence of disease progression and prohibitive toxicity. The safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy were evaluated, and the MTD and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) were determined. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were assigned to four CAP7.1 dose cohorts (45, 90, 150 and 200 mg/m2/day). CAP7.1 was well tolerated. Haematotoxicity was observed at the two highest dose levels including three DLTs (two febrile neutropenia and one sepsis) only and were reversible with adequate therapy. No organ toxicity was observed. Non-haematological toxicities (mild-moderate) consist mainly of nausea, fatigue, vomiting, pyrexia and alopecia. One partial response and 11 stable diseases were observed as supporting signs of efficacy. CONCLUSION: MTD of CAP7.1 was reached at the dose of 200 mg/m2. A favourable safety profile and initial anti-tumour efficacy of CAP7.1 in therapeutic refractory tumours warrant further evaluation in clinical studies.
Authors: Benjamin Goeppert; Marcus Renner; Stephan Singer; Thomas Albrecht; Qiangnu Zhang; Arianeb Mehrabi; Anita Pathil; Christoph Springfeld; Bruno Köhler; Christian Rupp; Karl Heinz Weiss; Anja A Kühl; Ruza Arsenic; Ulrich Frank Pape; Arndt Vogel; Peter Schirmacher; Stephanie Roessler; Nalân Utku Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 4.379